The Importance Of Technology

Attention is thought to be selective-focused on one subject at a time. Traditionally, it has been assumed that automatic processing is involuntary, it does not require attention, and is relatively fast; whereas, controlled processing is voluntary, does require attention, and is relatively slow. We can conclude from this that the more we repeat a certain material or tasks the more it becomes automatic and effortless to us.

The words science and technology can and regularly are utilized reciprocally. In any case, the objective of science is the quest for learning for its own purpose while the objective of technology is to make items that tackle issues and enhance human life. Technology is the down to earth use of science. Science from the Latin scientia (knowledge) is a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method, as well as the organized body of knowledge gained through such research (Science vs Technology, 2017). Technology is a broad concept that deals with a species' usage and knowledge of tools and crafts, and how it affects a species' ability to control and adapt to its environment (Science vs Technology, 2017). Today, the essential importance of science is mostly constrained to observational investigation including utilization of the logical strategy. Technology can be connected either largely or to particular territories: examples incorporate development Technology, therapeutic Technology, or cutting edge Technology.

Today’s society is more affected by technology than it ever has been and it is changing every second of every day. Advancements in technology have been changing our culture and society for hundreds of years; from hunters and gatherers to information overload to a future of the most advanced technologies we could imagine. These fast advancements in technology quickly change our society. This statement was greatly expanded upon by three people: Gerhard Lenski, Leslie White, and Alvin Toffler

In the book, “Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain,” David Eagleman challenges many ideas that we might have about our identities, mindset, perception and how they all come together to affect our actions and beliefs. Eagleman talks about how our brains work with our bodies to perceive our everyday life and tasks. He explains that the brain is a three- pound organ that takes control of our daily actions and alters our way of thinking and performing certain tasks. He states that it is easier for our brains to perform tasks like ride a bike or drive a car without thinking too much about it. In his book, he also talks about how the brain does not perform or think the same way someone else's brain might. The brain can automatically do a certain task without you even realizing it and is even able to make up a response when you don't remember exact details of a past event. This book has challenged many ideas that we may already have, or known about ourselves, and raises many questions about how our brain works to perceive and analyze information.

Technology has drastically changed over generations. With every advancement in technology the comfortability of every day living has improved. The development of technology began with human kind using natural resources to make simple tools. Tools help to minimize the time and effort of tasks that need to be performed. Current society relies heavily on the technology it has produced. The average American wakes up to a warm shower, a hot meal, a vehicle for transportation, and some type of equipment to help with his job. It has improved the way of life, but it also presents issues in current society. Complete dependency on technology is a concern along with degrading social interaction. Technology only keeps advancing with time. Efforts must

processes can be equally complex and wondrous. The human ability to reflect, to understand and

Technology is not only just defined as the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular area of life. It was a key, a key that will open the a new door for the future. Led the time of human history to the forever invention. Which will bring the world to a higher level of civilization. As what it has said that all the invention have on the world. Their job is to helping us as a human get things done faster and to better life. In fact that those invention create some problems too, such technology as [Phone, computer, TV, etc] is start to taking over the life of people in the real world. It has make people miss in the unreal world, but should that technology is key that built up the modern life, such invention as the network may change the people’s mind but it also connect people from country to country, nation to nation. Electric machine that not only just light the world on, it also by increase the use of them, it bought a better and easier life of the time. All those hard working that have process behind those inconceivable idea, led to the all those invention of the new machine, which help us build up a better world to live. Just like what it said, the true meaning of technology is key for the evolution of the world. All the things that have been created, connect and change the future life. And now humans create and making all those impossible ideas to become possible and useful things. But how truly and useful are all of these new inventions can use in

Time orientation sits on two major factors: how people value and control time (“Exactly what is time?,” 2017). A culture that ascribes to time orientation considers time in various perspectives including the present, the future, and past. For instance, an administrator who lays more emphasis on the three phases of society’s existence (present, past, and future) handles issues depending on experiences and beliefs acquired, derived, or anticipated. Hence, the concept is valuable when controlling

The processes of thought have been investigated for so long. Psychologists have investigated the brain’s involvement in the speed of processing information whether it is relevant or irrelevant. The two brain areas involved in the executive function of speed processing is the anterior cingulate and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. This study compares the phenomenon of speed processing with the evidence from past research among Stroop(1935), Windes(1968), Macleod(1991) and a number of others. Through the years the Stroop study has been used as the framework on demonstrating the phenomenon of speed processing involving relevant and irrelevant information. Windes’ study has elaborated on reaction times of subjects for quantity naming and numeral naming. Macleod’s study ermphasized similarities and differences among many hypotheses; collaborating Stroop’s study. His study evaluates the pilosophical positions that arose from Stroop those of which include the relative speed of processing and automaticity.

His participants had to perform 900 trials in total, by the 600 trials that task had become automatic in their memory bank. The other 300 trials became easier to the point they can do it without unconsciously. Some of the real-life experience that I have encounter is locking my car door without realizing it, sometimes I go back and check on it to make sure. The last time is saw my sister, I hugged her so fast that I forgot that I had already hugged her, because whenever we see each other we hug. According to Schneider and Shiffrin, automatic processing becomes impossible if the tasks are harder and it needs undivided attention in order to be

A human organism is linked with an external entity in a two-way interaction, creating a coupled system that can be considered to be cognitive in its own right. All

The Stroop Effect shows how the brain’s reaction time slows down when dealing with conflicting information which happens because of the

Reaction time, like most subjects related to the brain, has an interesting history. At first, most scientists believed that mental processes in the human brain were too fast to be measured. However, a Dutch Physiologist named F.C. Donders started to think, about whether reaction time could be measured in 1965. Donder’s thoughts were backed up by research done by a English scientist and inventor Charles Wheatstone. In 1840, Wheatstone conducted an experiment where a patient’s foot was shocked. The test subject had to press a button using the hand that was on the same side as the foot that was shocked. Some patients knew which foot would be shocked and others did not know. There was a one-fifteenth second delay between the two. The was the first record of the mind being measured (Shannon, 2012).

The Online Cognition Lab evaluates the potential of human cognitive systems by exposing them to a succession of letters. Given the speed of succession, it is most likely that people do not get to see the second letter presented. This is primarily a factor of variation in time. The probability of getting to see or perceive the second letter depends on the time we take to become attentive enough to see the second letter. Human cognition systems have a threshold time with which they take to pay attention to a particular stimuli. Take for example the human eye. After seeing

When I was a child, I was always fond of the time. I remember asking my mother “Mommy, what time is it?” tens of times a day. After I learnt how to read numbers, she got me my first watch. It was a digital watch manufactured by Casio and I felt in love with it. When I started Grade 3, I said to myself that I am now a big girl and I wanted a watch similar to my mother’s analog watch. My mother told me that she would get me one under one condition: I have to know how to read an analog watch. I went to my father and asked him if he was willing to teach me how to read the analog clock hanged on our living room wall. He said “Okay!”