STRATEGY
On the issuance of Prime Minister Decree no. (1294) for year 2013 in November to form EFSA’s Board of Directors for a period of four years, over the past few months EFSA developed a vision for its future directions and identifying its 2014 work plan. The future directions include the following:
First: The Fundamental Principles adopted by EFSA
Second: The Axes of work for each activity supervised by EFSA
Third: The Axes of the Internal Construction of EFSA’s Institutional Structure
First: The Fundamental Principles adopted by EFSA
• Balancing between supervision and regulation over the safety of the financial markets, customer’s protection, and between the development of the markets mentioned, also increase its appeal.
• Claritying of the legislations governing the various activities of the market, seeking to update it to respond to the actual practice and consistency with the best international practices, and providing access to products and modern financial instruments. The necessity of consulting the concerned parties, especially those working in the activity.
• Simplifying the procedures for dealing with EFSA and striving to put deadlines for its completion.
• Ensuring communication with all parties involved in the market, educating dealers, and provide fast response to their suggestions and complaints.
• Attending to EFSA employees in terms of their skills development, motivating them, and providing them with an acceptable working environment and
Another important point would be to provide information. For example sales staff should explain in detail the main
Regulatory environment consist of several laws and regulations that has been developed by federal, state, and local governments in order to limit control over business practices. The regulatory environment plays an important role in the positive operation of the financial sector and in the efficient management and integration of capital flow and domestic savings. “The value of the claims of financial institutions on borrowers is dependent upon the
Firstly, the Dodd–Frank Act pushes forward the reformation of America's financial regulatory system. Several new regulatory authorities are set up to enhance the government supervision and administration of the industry. The Financial Stability Oversight Council is established to identify material risks to financial stability, with the support from Office of Financial Research. Moreover, Fed is entitled to exercise additional superintendence beyond banks.
Discuss the challenges related to regulating a complex global financial firm and make suggestions for regulatory improvements.
By the reason of fact the market abuse caused abusive behavior the financial market has become vulnerable. In this manner today’s financial sector need to mull over new improvements in this sector. For this purpose financial security regulations have been corrected and rebuilt to prevent the market abuse.
With this title two new government departments are created The Financial stability Oversight Council and the Office of Financial Research. The authority of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is it expanded also to allow them to supervise nonbank financial companies and certain bank holding companies that could affect the health of the country’s economy.
New financial regulations have been created and existing regulations have been revised in the aftermath of the financial crisis. The role of financial regulatory policy in the financial crisis is sometimes presented in a way that will help the economy improve. Deregulation was an approach that the economy was implementing towards to. According to Kroszner and Strahan in the reading about What Drives Deregulation?, in order to achieve a positive theory of regulatory change, it is crucial for an economy to characterize the regulatory process as one in which “well-organized groups use the power of the state to capture rents at the expense of more dispersed groups.” (Kroszner, Strahan Pp 1438) This suggested that the elimination of restrictions on bank branching will benefit the theories of regulatory change.
Developing and executing plans and strategies to achieve revenue goals, growth and market share. Coordinating with Partners to approach accounts strategically. Also, applying best-in-class sales skills to manage inbound activity and drive outbound outreach to target prospects.
With the Financial Crisis of 2008, many governments and regulators were forced to relook at their regulatory policies taking into consideration the innovations that the financial services world is continuously subject to. In European Markets particularly, the market was fragmented as well as the regulations were limited in scope. This called out for the need of MiFID II, which not only widens the scope of directive, but also addresses the issues which came out during the crisis.
(a) individualized, strengths-based transition services and supports; (b) positive career development and early work experiences; (c) meaningful collaboration and interagency involvement; (d) family supports and expectations; (e) fostering self-determination and independence; (f) social and employment related skill instruction; and (g) establishing job-related supports. (Lee & Carter, 2012).
Economists throughout the world have agreed that there is a need of regulation of the financial system in its entirety. This is because, as the financial crisis from 2008 has shown, the micro orientated regulation measures do not suffice. They neglect the build-up of systemic risk and the interconnections within the financial system, which have shown to lead to the amplification of the effects of shocks. Therefore, as a complement to the microprudential framework, a new type of regulation tools is being developed- macroprudential. It aims to prevent the accumulation of systemic risk and improve the stability of the financial system.
With the development of different types of financial products, the transactions between individuals and financial institutions (such as banks, insurance companies or finance firms) are becoming widespread. Those individuals who use, have used or may use financial services or have invested, or may invest in financial instruments can be named as financial consumers.[ Financial Service and Markets Act 2000, s.1G. ] However, in most of financial transactions, consumers are in disadvantaged positions because of the information asymmetry between the financial institutions and the individuals. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore financial consumer protection.
When looking at something as large as the economy, we have to realize that there is always the potential for something to go wrong. This could be something that naturally takes place due to lows and highs in business cycles, or something that is totally unnatural, like human manipulation of the market. Due to things like this we often have to set some type of regulations to keep certain factors of the economy in check. During this paper I will discuss some of the regulation packages that have been introduced in an effort to keep the economy in check. A few of these include the Glass-Steagall Act, the Frank-Dodd Act, and the Volker Rule. Furthermore, we will attempt to answer questions like, how does the Frank-Dodd address the “Too Big to Fail” problem with banks? Do you think the Frank-Dodd Act accomplishes its goal? If not, what might you suggest to correct the issue?
In the UK the Financial Services Sector relies upon the systems of supervision and regulation put into operation by the government which promises to deliver the good quality service as well as security. The
Regulators of financial matters and performance in a given country or region are often faced with the difficult task of ensuring that the performance of the economy is always positive. This is because the economy of a country directly influences the standard of living in the country through factors such as employment and the overall prices of commodities in the country. to effectively control, the performance of the economy, regulators make use of various tools that are at their disposal.