preview

The Justification Of Suicide In Hamlet's Soliloquy '

Decent Essays

In his soliloquy, Hamlet contemplates committing suicide as he says, “to be or not to be – that is the question” (3.1.56) – which roughly means ‘to exist or not to exist”. Hamlet is angry at his mother for marrying so soon after the death of his father and asks whether it is better to “suffer [in the mind] // The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, // Or to take arms against a sea of troubles // And, by opposing, end them” (3.1.65-68). Essentially, Hamlet is questioning whether he should endure the pain of watching his mother marry again, so soon after the death of his father, or to end his life and no longer feel that pain. Hamlet compares death to sleep, implying that dying is just as easy as sleeping. But Hamlet fears “what dreams may come” (3.1.65) will be nightmares that last forever. …show more content…

With Man’s ability to think, our inability to understand or comprehend what comes after life is what scares us the most. Hamlet’s options are to run away and leave all his troubles behind by committing suicide, or avenge his father by committing a sin. In the interpretation of the first video of Hamlet’s soliloquy, Hamlet chooses to not commit suicide by throwing away his dagger. Similarly, in the third video, Hamlet points his dagger to a mirror – which Claudius happens to be behind of, indicating that Hamlet chose not to commit suicide but to avenge his father. Shakespeare uses imagery like “slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” and ‘sea of troubles” to depict the chaos within Hamlet’s mind as he contemplates suicide. Shakespeare then compares sleeping to dying, implying that dying would not be a bad or hard thing to

Get Access