The millennial generation, which was so named by the authors of the book “Generations” Neil Howe and William Strauss, are a generation set apart. In fact, their proclivity to bunk tradition and make their own way is one of the reasons Howe and Strauss came up with the name millennial generation. Even though the generation was still young at the time during the writing of their book, they could see that the millennials were different from all the generations that came before. One of the most notable differences is their desire to avoid marriage. Not relationships, but the institute of marriage. As a millennial yourself, you likely wonder why relationships are lived out differently in your generation. Read below to learn what the statistics reveal and determine if the move away from marriage is good or bad for society:
The Data Reveals Interesting Trends:
Although it is clear that millennials don’t want to get married, data shows they are not opposed to the institution itself. A 2014 Pew Research poll found that only 4 percent of millennials are against marriage itself. An overwhelming majority of 61 percent say they do want to get married, just not now. This data shows that millennialls aren’t really against marriage itself but instead …show more content…
In other words, in the eyes of past generations, living together was no substitute for getting married. Today’s generation though sees cohabitation as a valid and even superior alternative to traditional marriage, since around a quarter of young adults aged 25 to 34 are currently living with a partner. Perhaps the shift from marriage to cohabitation reveals a difference in priorities or a move away from the previous generation’s religious beliefs. After all, most of the previous generation considered marriage a holy institution and therefore a requirement for a person of faith. So, we know the millennials think differently about marriage, but
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
People believe that marriage is easy and is the key to love and happiness, but in reality marriage is harder than it looks. Everyone marries for different reasons, for good or for bad. People today don’t understand the meaning of marriage; it is more than just money and appearance. Seeing today’s world of marriage is being influenced by media shows like Jerry Springer, Judge Judy, and Murray makes you realize how society today identifies marriage different. Couples who live unmarried will be happier and have more choices than those that are married in agreement with Catherine Newman’s essay called I Do. Not.: Why I Won’t Marry in the book “Acting Out Culture: Reading and Writing “, by: James S. Miller. Catherine Newman is a writer and an author
The book has a section entitled, “Marriage is traditional” and in that particular section it mentioned about how “marriage has changed over time.” When examined current day marriage trends show that people are looking for partnership or soul mates, not for the most traditional reasons of the past. The idea that one person is supposed to be with one person for the rest of their life is no longer relevant. It is possible to have many happy years with one person, but that does not mean that these people will die together. People can have a falling out. Situations change—people do grow. If people stayed stagnant their whole lives, where would society be? With the way
As stated in our text, various factors can bind married couples together, such as economic interdependencies, legal, social and moral constraints, relationship, and amongst other things. In the recent years some of these factors have diminished their strengths. The modern generation sees marriage in a different perspective altogether. Individuals today feel they are stable independently, they do not need to rely on their spouse for emotional or financial support. Many are career driven and soar to conquer their dreams over settling down with a family. Such untraditional views have increased divorce rates.
Today, alternative long-term relationships are growing in times in heterosexual and LGBTQ relationships. Cohabitation is defined by “Recent Changes in Family Structure” as quote: “an intimate relationship that includes a common living place and which exists without the benefit of legal, cultural, or religious sanction.” Between 2005 and 2009 2/3 of relationships approximately were preceded by cohabitation (“Rise of Cohabitation” 2014.) This arrangement is less committed and therefore it takes longer to end, without much emotional devastation of a pricey divorces. Most marriages still begin with cohabitation. However, it is becoming less and less likely that cohabitation will end in a marriage. Marriage is still common in today’s culture, with approximately 60.25 million married couples in 2016 (“Number of married couples in the United States from 1960 to 2016 (in millions)” 2016.) This is evident why it is killing the nuclear family standard. People are having less desire to fully commit to a marriage in the first place. 1950 social standards would have never accepted an unmarried couple as a part of a normal life so only can a legal marriage constitutes the ideal set forth. Another, way to break the standard is remove some components.
In “For better, for worse: Marriage means something different now,” Stephanie Coontz reveals the worldwide changes in people’s attitudes and behaviors towards marriage. According to Coontz, education and the social norms are the reasons why marriage has become nonessential. Being single and going through a divorce are more acceptable now. The motivations of marriage have turned from economic dependence into personal willingness. In fact, Coontz’s words make me wonder the true meaning of marriage. Even though the meaning has changed over times, I believed that I still hope to get married.
In this essay, “The Cohabitation Epidemic,” by Neil Clark Warren, is talking about why many people decide to live their lives in cohabitation instead of getting married right away. Older generations would look at cohabiting as being something bad or even immoral. In this century, this epidemic is something common and, notwithstanding, normal. Over the years, the U.S. Census Bureau has kept up with how this lifestyle has evolved. In 1970, they had 1 million people that were “unmarried-partner households,” and that number rose to 3.2 million in 1990. In the year 2000, they had 11 million people living in those situations.
On the other hand, individualism in men and women has great impact on the traditional American family; in fact, women have put their careers as a priority. They are entering in the workforce having higher incomes, simultaneously, leaving the concept of marriage way behind. Also, men and women are deciding not to get married at all, and just living in civil unions. This is the same case for same sex couples that adopt children, visualizing a traditional family thus causing a controversy in the society. Some people prefer cohabitate because they want their time and space. Another example is that women have decided to have fewer or not children, and ending their fertility at early ages. As a result, fertility rates are being the lowest level in history.
In over half a century, marriage has transformed from being a social requirement to simply being an option in today’s society. What has caused this change? Many institutions in our society have changed drastically along with marriage. Although these institutions have not caused marriage to be optional, they do strongly correlate with the decreased value. The economy, education, religion, and government have all altered since the 1950s. When any institution encounters a change, all other institutions are affected. Family is a major institution in society, and I believe that marriage is an important aspect of this institution. Cohabitation, religion, women in the work world and divorce have all effected the way marriage is viewed today.
turning out in today’s day and age. He goes on with facts and statistics to back-up himself for
Marriage a long-standing fundamental to functional society. Marriage is a perspective of what used to be socially the beginning of a nuclear family. A nuclear family consisting of a father, mother, and children. In the twentieth century it was considered proper in society to be married before having children. However, this is no longer the case in modern United States. What aspects are there that make our generation susceptible to cohabitation instead of marriage?
She interviewed 120 young adults of both genders between the ages of 18 and 32. The participants are all from the state of New York. There family backgrounds and socioeconomical background is very differs. Gerson finds that today’s young generation is far from wanting a fallback to a traditional marriage nor to they want a commitment free life. The majority of the young she interviews said that their most desirable family option is a long-term intimate egalitarian relationship and great balance between work
A survey of 14000 adults states in ‘A Guide to Family Issues: The Marriage Advantage’ that marriage was a pertinent factor contributing to happiness and satisfaction with forty percent of the married individuals being happy as opposed to 25 percent of either single or cohabiting individuals. The same study shows that ninety eight percent of never married respondents wished to marry and out of those 88% believed that it should be a lifelong commitment. Even though, divorce rates are rising numerous researches show that young people aspire to have a lasting marriage.
Since the 1960’s, American family has changed. According to the New York Times, “the traditional family is mom, dad, pets, and kids” (Angier, 2013). This was your traditional family everyone was expected to aspire. Once they reached adulthood, they had to live by society rules or by the bible to be considered an example for others. During the same era, women need to be married before they decided to have children. Now, women are having children without having a partner by their side. Another is some couples are choosing cohabitation over marriage. They see marriage as a long term commitment. Cohabitation is a better option because it’s for couples who are looking to settle down without marriage. Both men and women would marry much younger before from sixteen years old to eighteen. But now, both men and women are marrying much later in life between thirty and forty years of age. Another controversy is there’s now gay marriage but, before gay marriage within the same sex wasn’t legal. Many people don’t agree with same sex marriage.
Tradition gives way to the new era. Saying “I do” before saying, “We found our new home,” is a thing of the past. Today, more and more couples are choosing cohabitation over marriage. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, between the year of 2006 and 2010, 48% of women ranging from age 15 to 44 years of age first lived with a man to whom they were not married (Grinberg). When compared to the numbers from 1995, which was 34% percent, the change in trend becomes obvious (Grinberg). There are many reasons why marriage is no longer the next big step for America’s unwedded couples.
Although marriage has been a central factor and gives meaning to human lives, the change in people’s lifestyles and behaviors through a long period of social development has resulted in alternate choices such as being single or nonmarital living. As a result, cohabitation has become more popular as a trendy life choice for young people. The majority of couples choose cohabitation as a precursor to marriage to gain a better understanding of each other. However, there are exceptions, such as where Thornton, Azinn, and Xie have noted: “In fact, the couple may simply slide or drift from single into the sharing of living quarters with little explicit discussion or decision-making. This sliding into cohabitation without