preview

The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street Analysis

Decent Essays

You can be stabbed or shot, but nothing compares the darkness of your mind. In The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street, what really caused the antagonism of the residents of Maple Street was the resentment and fear they felt towards their fellow neighbors. Ultimately, this proves that prejudices are more dangerous than weapons. Evidence that illustrate the example are when Charlie accused Tommy of being the “monster” because of his knowledge what would happen, as well as the accusation leveled against Les Goodman when his car turned on. Within The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street, we meet a 14-year-old boy named Tommy, whose predicament illustrates that prejudices are more dangerous than weapons. One such occurrence is when Charlie stated, “It’s… it’s the kid. It’s Tommy. He’s the one! “(681). Prejudice is more dangerous than weapons which is shown when Charlie accused Tommy which made all the negative attention from Charlie went the kid. Weapons cannot speak therefore, cannot change the view of the crowd. Continuing, because of Charlie’s prejudice against Tommy, the view of the crowd has changed which is illustrated in this excerpt of The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street “[There’s a gasp from the crowd…] Woman: But He knew, He was the only who knew! He told us all about it. Well, how did he know? How could he have known? Voices: How could he know? Who told him? Make the kid answer.” (681) A weapon couldn’t shift the mood of the crowd from one person to another. This reveals

Get Access