preview

The Namesake Irony Quotes

Good Essays

Is it ironic that Gogol Ganguli’s true good name was lost in the mail? Would the story have progressed in the same pattern? Would the obvious self-identity crisis Gogol faced throughout the novel be present? Would there even be a novel? All these questions focus around the same core: irony. Lahiri capitalizes this literary device to develop the plot of the Namesake. To think that the whole book is rooted in one lost letter is ironic. All the struggles, Gogol undergoes to try to define himself would have been irrelevant if the letter, containing his good name, would have arrived successfully from his Grandmother (Caesar). Additionally, Lahiri delves into irony’s literary capabilities to reveal a character’s life lessons and perspectives in the four main characters (Gilroy). However, she primarily uses irony to further the theme seed of identity crisis, mainly for the character Gogol. Throughout the novel The Namesake, Lahiri uses irony to illustrate one of the main character’s, Gogol, identity crisis in order to show how the discrepancy of conflicting cultures and ideas can impact one’s sense of who they are.
Lahiri highlights various types of irony to explore the identity …show more content…

Whether we realize it or not, we all at some point in time, face an identity crisis. Not saying that each person has a lifelong identity struggle, but everyone at one time questions their existence and their future. What we all need to realize is the undeniable truth we are our own person; undefinable human beings. We mold our own personalities, paths, and relationships (Caesar). All of the ironic events in Gogol’s life, “things that never should have happened, that seemed out of place and wrong, these were what prevailed, are what endured in the end” (Lahiri 287). Our failures, successes, and heritage are all parts of who we are, not what we are as Gogol has learned. At the end of the day, if you do not love yourself, how can others love

Get Access