The Nature Vs. Nurture Debate

What determines who you are or what you will become? The debate between nature versus nurture is trying to figure this out. According to “Essentials of Psychology”, Jeffrey S. Nevid (2012) Nature versus nurture is the debate about how genetics and nature determine our behavior. In other words, have your attitude, behavior and health problems developed because of how you were raised or who you came from. It is a debate that has stumped psychologists for centuries. The study of twins, both identical and fraternal, have made it easier for psychologists to figure out this debate. So what is the answer to this age old debate; Nature or Nurture?

Human development is known as the most highly controversial topics in the world of psychology. The debate is known as nature vs. nurture. The controversy on nature vs. Nurture centers on the personality, behavior, intelligence, and feelings. This debate is over are they genetically inherited or environmentally earned. We are all known as innate creatures born

The debate of Nature vs. Nurture is almost as old as humans themselves. Science that mysterious language that allows to understand the world around us still can't give us a clear picture into our DNA. Are our personalities somehow linked to the chemicals in our brains or do we take after those who raise us?

In our society there are many controversial topics that are discussed amongst many of us. Sociology reveals those topics and shines a light on them. Without sociology, we wouldn 't be able to decipher what we think is “common sense”, from actual facts and evidence. After carefully studying an abundance of data from things such as experiments, statistics, and the macro perspective of experiences, only then can we find what we think may be the truth. A specific example of a controversial sociological topic is the debate of nature v. nurture. This debate has been going on for a very long time, and it really depends on who you talk to about it. What nature v. nurture refers to is that you are either the person you are because of heredity, or you are who you are because of society and are thus, a product of your environment. People 's experiences and own personal findings affect how they see this particular subject matter. If you were to ask John Locke, he would tell you that “a child 's mind is a (blank slate). They become what they are taught to be.” (Thio) Now this probably makes sense to you, at least to some degree. But to others this doesn 't make sense at all. Some people, whether conscious or unconscious of it, will blame almost anything on heredity. Things like “You got that attitude from your mother.” or “Your father used to say that same thing when he was your age.” The question is, was it really passed down to you, or did you learn it? Things like this are the entire

The long-lived “Nature vs. Nurture” debate within the field of psychology is concerned with the extent to which behaviour of any human being is a result of inherited or learned characteristics. The “Nature” of the debate focuses on how genetic factors affect the personality, thought process, and other characteristics of any given person. On the other hand, the “Nurture” side of this debate believes that early childhood experiences, how one is raised, social relations, and surrounding culture affect their psychological development and the actions they take later on in life. Throughout the history of psychology, however, this debate has continued to stir up controversy. For example; is the academic success of a child a result of genetics and

There has been an ongoing debate on nature versus nurture that has been around for years. What determines our identity? Our biological nature or the things we grew up around? The answers to these questions still remain uncertain, but are still widely discussed. Deborah Blum shares her opinions on these issues in “Gender Blur”. In her writing, she challenges where we separate biology from society. While our biological nature determines our gender, our surroundings and the things we are exposed to make up our true identity.

One of the most commonly used debates in the history of psychology is that of nature vs nurture. Does one's surroundings affect the person they become, or are they genetically programmed at birth to act as they do? Thanks to explanations from either side of this debate, an excuse for the crazed actions of an individual can be found in both their birth and their own personal upbringing.

The nature vs. nurture issues is the most important study of human development for many reasons. In fact, both issues play an important role in human development over time. One main reason why nature vs. nurture is an important study in psychology today is because of its developmental traits. Traits are characteristics inherited from your parents. Also, a trait is something that is passed down from generation, such as a person’s personality.

Do you ever wonder why you act? The nature vs nurture debate has been going for a long time and many people research about it. Nature needs to be noticed because it is important. Identical twins are different in many different ways. My personality has changed a lot over time. Studies show that nurture has more effect on your personality than nature. Nurture has more of an influence than nature.

Scientists and biologist have argued the Nature versus Nurture debate for decades. This debate argues the degree to which our genetics or environment, affects our behaviour and developmental stages. Nature is described as the genetic material that makes up an individual. Nurture can be described as the way in which the environment and experiences of an individual influence their behavior and development. The debate has centered on which is a greater factor for many years but current contemporary views accept and acknowledge the intricacy of the developmental procedure and recognize that “development is not the case of nature or nurture, but rather nature and nurture” (Howard & Walton 2015) It has been shown that genetic and environmental factors are in such continuous interactions that the emergence of particular structures and functions is the result of the dependent interaction of genetics and environment.(Lewkowicz, 2011.)

One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the Nature vs Nurture debate. Some famous philosophers suggested that certain things are inborn and occur naturally regardless of environmental influences. In contrast to those beliefs, other thinkers such as John Locke believe that the mind begins as a blank slate.

Nature is genes and it contributes to personality. Anais and sam were twins and separated at birth, and their personality are quite the same; they are both spunky, dramatic,Creative careers, both of them talk with their hands. The Jim twins were separated at birth, but they are amazing alike, This is why they both had the same IQ, same jobs of Deputy sheriff and after that was woodworking, they had wives with the same name Linda and Betty. Twins half of the time has the same homasexality by genes. Marjorie and Jenna were both Religious.

The nature-versus-nurture controversial debate has always been central to the theme of development. Naturally, several predominant theories come to the fore and place different weights on nature and nurture. My concept of interest is active adaptation theory, which falls on the relatively endogenous side of the scale of source of developmental change.

The most controversial dispute within the study of human development has been the Nature versus Nurture debate. The root of this major dispute is whether a person’s characteristics are inborn, the results of nature, or whether their characteristics are formed by environmental factors, the results of nurture. (PSYCH 56). While many argue that humans are the result of nature or nurture, I believe that we are a product of both.

Nature versus nurture, one of the oldest philosophical debates. Genes or nature, environmental influence or innate tendencies? Is there a possibility the two both play equal roles? Do our parents and our environment really shape us into the people we are or are we born with specific traits? How do we become who we are? Those same questions have been debated over for centuries and centuries. The real question is whether a person’s development is predisposed in DNA, or is a majority influenced by life experiences.The modern debate centers around the effect genes have on human personalities compared to the influences that early environment and development have. (Nature Nurture in Psychology.) Many psychologists believe that the debate is