The Nature vs. the Society
On "The Scarlet Letter” theme, different scholars have a very different understanding of the conflict inside. Among the many comments, the most intriguing was undoubtedly the American critic professor Nina Baym’s view that “The Scarlet Letter” is a natural and social person depicted bifurcation novel. Nina Baym noted: ““The market “appears in this scene between the individual and society of individuals originally appeared consistent with an imagined differences, a fissure." [ 1 ] In fact, the whole novel, more or less reflects the contradictory nature of the individual between the individual and society. This conflict try to reach some kind of agreement within human nature during the development of the book, but finally ended in a blending state. The major conflict was presented by two different representative from the nature and society. Hester and her daughter Pearl represent on behalf of the nature, while Chillingworth and Dimondale despite their love rivalry represent the interests of a community which is the society.
The Nature’s interpretation
In Hester’s view, the pursuit of love, which is a very personal thing that has nothing to do with the social, moral and religion. Although she formally accepted the punishment that wearing a red “a “word on her chest, but within her ideology, “she did not accept the punishment of those social ethics “[ 2 ] .This punishment not only doesn’t bother her, but also become “The pass that guide her to the
In The Scarlet Letter Hypocrisy is evident everywhere. The characters of Hester, Dimmesdale, Chillingworth, and the very society that the characters lived in, were steeped in hypocrisy. Hawthorne was not subtle in his portrayal of the terrible sin of hypocrisy; he made sure it was easy to see the sin at work , at the same time however, parallels can be drawn between the characters of The Scarlet Letter and of today’s society.
The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne shows multiple connections between characters and nature. As the story progresses nature becomes more prevalent in the characters and continues to establish certain characteristics for each character. This established connection provides a view into the depths of human nature that each character portrays.
In the novel The Scarlet Letter, written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, the characters, Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth face the burden of making paramount decisions. Each character chooses to make bold choices with substantial effects which determine how the story plays out. First, Hester chooses to not expose Pearl’s father. Second, Dimmesdale refrains from revealing himself. Lastly, Chillingworth chooses to hide his true identity as Hester’s husband. The end results of the antecedent decisions influence the shape and structure of the novel.
The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne presents the reader with the harsh, life changing conflicts of three Puritan characters during the 17th century. Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Robert Chillingworth must endure their different, yet surprisingly similar struggles as the novel progresses. Despite their similarities, Hawthorne shows these individuals deal with their conflicts differently, and in the end, only one prevails. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s intricately critical diction helps determine his didactic tone; during the course of The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne reveals that happiness can be harnessed through one’s perseverance.
All of the major characters in The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne are dynamic and go through some form of character development. Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale, who are at the forefront of the central conflict in the plot of the novel, are no exception. While their respective evolutions in character were noticeably different, each was emphasized by the three scaffold scenes. The differences of Hester and Dimmesdale’s respective character developments are highlighted and emphasized by the three scaffold scenes in the novel.
This article is going to cover an internal conflict within, The Scarlet Letter. The internal conflict shall be about Hester, and Dimmesdale. Hester is shamed by the Puritan village for having an affair, and concieving a child. For this Hester is forced to wear a scarlet 'A' on her breast till the day she dies. The Puritans force Hester away from the village making her live almost in solitude.
In the beginning of the novel, Hester refuses to let her sin define her, which her subtle, beautiful, yet defiant nature displays. With all eyes on her as she walks out of the jail, the townspeople notice “On the breast of her gown, in fine red cloth, surrounded with an elaborate embroidery and fantastic flourishes of gold thread, appeared the letter A” (Hawthorne 46). This embroidered A serves as a punishment of her sin and is supposed to be a disgraceful, ugly reminder to her and everyone around her. If she had succumbed to her punishment and the persona that went with it, then it would be an ugly A, but she makes
In the book “The Scarlet Letter,” Hester’s silence gives power over both Reverend Dimmesdale and Chillingworth. Battista’s article shows that Hester, Dimmesdale, and Chillingworth play a vital role in analyzing the novel’s worth.
Nathaniel Hawthorne, a well-know Dark Romantic, employs the issues prevalent in Dark Romanticism in his novel The Scarlet Letter. These include the concepts of: guilt and sin, good and evil, and madness in the human psyche. Guilt and sin are heavily addressed in the novel, focusing on Hester’s outward versus Dimmesdale’s hidden guilt, and the sins committed by the adulterous couple and the revenge-driven Roger Chillingworth. The idea of what good and evil are is questioned in the novel. For example, the reader is led to question if Hester was right in not revealing Dimmesdale, and in turn if both Dimmesdale and Chillingworth were
Hester’s initial sacrifice for love is highlighted during her decision to commit the affair with Arthur Dimmesdale. Although she was fully aware of the consequences that accompanied the affair, she considered love to be more valuable than her reputation among other individuals in the community. Yet again, Hester was met with another option to further sacrifice the reputation that had already been abandoned, when she exclaimed “that I might endure his agony, as well as mine” (Hawthorne 58). She held the identity of her affair a mystery to the outside world, which not only provided the man with protection, but it also defined Hester’s idolization of love and endearment. Due to Hester’s reputational sacrifice, Nathaniel Hawthorne used her forbidden relationship to characterize the rigid and punitive Puritan community of the colonial
In the fictional novel The Scarlet Letter, the contrast between public and private truth is made quite clear. The three main characters of this book make perfect examples of this overarching theme. The characters in this book are the pastor Mr. Dimmesdale, the doctor Roger Chillingworth, and the adulteress Hester Prynne. First, Mr. Dimmesdale, who seems like devout clergyman to the public, has a big secret that could get him killed if it were made known. Next, Roger Chillingworth, a harmless doctor in the eyes of the public, is actually a man on an evil and vengeful mission. Finally, Hester Prynne’s public truth is that she is unimportant outcast while in private the complete opposite is true. In conclusion, Mr. Dimmesdale, Roger Chillingworth, and Hester Prynne all are prime examples of the theme, public versus private truth, that Hawthorne tries to convey in The Scarlet Letter.
As a prose romance, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter sets characters up in opposition to each other to illustrate extremes of human experience. Dimmesdale is presented as the ultimate hypocrite, preaching moral righteousness to the Puritan community whilst being an adulterer himself. Hester, on the other hand, is painted in stark contrast to Dimmesdale: although shunned as an adulterer by the Puritan community, she lives out her life honestly, taking care of her illegitimate daughter Pearl. The forest is a place of liberation from oppressive social norms and a place of revelation for Hester and Dimmesdale, where they are able to reveal aspects of themselves that they
Nineteenth century literature is highly influenced by historical facts for the characters and the setting of the story. Hawthorne uses historical facts and integrates them into his story. The 1900’s are the prime time of religion, etiquette and social classes. A lot of our customs today come from this time period. In the past, questioning any of these could result in serious punishments. In both The Scarlett Letter and The House of Seven Gables, Hawthorne demonstrates the impact of going against the customs as well as social etiquette in the nineteenth century.
The literary genre of Romanticism was popular throughout the nineteenth century. Romanticism consists of six main characteristics; the individual, intuition, imagination, nature, emotions, and the unknown. Each Romantic author portrayed their view of the genre in their novels; each one in a slightly different manner. The authors each have a different emphasis on the characteristics depending on the plot of their novels. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s prefaces to The Blithedale Romance and The House of the Seven Gables and his short tale “The Custom House” incorporate the Romantic ideals of intuition, nature, and imagination.
In The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne, the ability of one event to affect the entire course of a lifetime and how Romanticism plays a major role in that is recounted. The Scarlet Letter exemplifies the definition of Romanticism through nature, behaviors, and intolerance. In the novel, nature is used as a safe haven and special relations are set up with it among multiple characters. The characters’ primitive behaviors go to show how most decisions made are solely off of impulse, instead of logic or reason. Also, religious intolerance is the prime component in the novel that helps rid old and embrace new ways in the town. Not only did the novel epitomize Romanticism, but it additionally defied the limits of what was considered to be acceptable