The need for intravascular catheters are evidently clear in modern day medical practices especially in the intensive care setting (ICU). Despite the necessity of such catheters, their use places patients at risk of developing complications such as infections, thrombophlebitis, endocarditis and a variety of other metastatic infections. In the hospital setting an estimated 250,000 bloodstream infections (BSI) associated to CVC occur annually, thus the need for proper aseptic skin care. The widely used antiseptic for cleansing CVC sites in the United States was iodine. However several studies have shown that cleansing CVC sites with 2% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate lowered BSI when compared to iodine. (O’Grady et. al., 2011)
Change Model
…show more content…
(Stevens, 2012)
Define the Scope of the EBP
According to the CDC an approximate 80,000 BSI cases occur in ICUs annually in the United States, with an estimated 250,000 cases in hospitals as a whole. The mortality rate associated in this case is around 12-25% per infection, causing a cost of $25,000 per episode for the health care system. In this writers facility aseptic techniques are emphasized, including the use of chlorhexidine instead of iodine. The impact of BSI via CVC are not only patient centered but cost the healthcare system an approximate $34,508-$56,000 per case to treat each infection.
Stakeholders
Members that would be included on the team to prevent CVC associated BSI are the physician whose responsibility is to ensure proper procedures and practices are carried out during insertion, such as aseptic techniques. After insertion of the CVC then it is the job of the radiologist to ensure proper placement of the tube using X-Ray imaging. After insertion and confirmation of placement then the nurse takes over, performing duties such as dressing changes and assessment of the site for complications. Also part of the team is the certified nursing assistant (CNA) who spends more time with the patient than anyone else on the team who can report complications earlier to the nurse.
Determine Responsibility of Team Members These members are important to the team because they each at one time or another has an interaction with
It can also occur during blood transfusion or during dressing change. The insertion of central catheters can occur in the Interventional Radiology or sometimes at the bedside. Regardless of the where the insertion process occur, a sterile field must always be maintained and sterile techniques must always be employed to prevent any organisms from being introduced to the central line into the patient. According to The Joint Commission (2013), many organizations such as Michigan Keystone Intensive Care Unit Project and Institute for Healthcare Improvement are actually adhering to insertion bundles to reduce the CLABSI rates. The bundles include hand hygiene, maximal barrier precautions, chlorhexidine skin preparation, avoidance of femoral vein, and prompt removal of central catheter. Furuya et al. (2011) studied the effectiveness of the insertion bundle and how it impacts the bloodstream infections for patients in the Intensive Care Unit. As a result, lesser infection have occurred when the compliance is high. As mentioned, the site of the catheter also needs to be considered in the insertion process. Avoiding areas such as the groin to access the femoral artery is recommended because this area can be easily contaminated with urine or feces. In addition, after the insertion of a new central line, all the used IV tubing
The work of Burke, et al (2011) reports that a study with the objective of comparing the "efficacy of intradermal bacteriostatic normal saline with that of intradermal buffered lidocaine in providing local anesthesia to adult patients prior to IV catheterization." (p.1) The study concluded that intradermal buffered lidocaine was superior to intradermal bacteriostatic normal saline in providing local anesthesia prior to IV catheterization in this group of predominately white adults and should be the solution of choice for venipuncture pretreatment." (Burke, et al, 2011, p.1) Burke et al reports that surgery is something that most people fear with the fear of the unknown is combined with "apprehension about such anticipated procedures as insertion of an IV line." (2011, p.1) Burke additionally reports that patients admitted for same-day surgery "require IV access. Any venipuncture, including peripheral IV catheterization with a medium-to-large-gauge catheter, can cause some degree of pain. Using local anesthesia prior to IV catheterization has
In 2013, a magnet recognized hospital, Baptist Health Lexington, reduced CAUTI rates in ICU patients by 60% (Roser, Piercy & Altpeter, 2014). The study included six interventions that were followed by the staff in the effort to reduce CAUTI. The six interventions included: “communication of CAUTI data to interdisciplinary teams, a nurse-driven, physician approved protocol, problem analysis using Lean principles, daily unit-based surveillance rounds, silver alloy urinary catheters, and an antimicrobial bundle comprised of two cleansing products for patients with an indwelling urinary catheter” (Roser, Piercy & Altpeter, 2014). The nurse-physician protocol allowed for nurses to assess whether the catheter was still necessary and if found not to be, the nurse could discontinue it. This resulted in a 58% decrease in the number of catheters used (Roser, Piercy & Altpeter, 2014). An education session was implemented by nurses using principles from the Lean system that checked the capability of nurses to understand just how dangerous CAUTI can be. It was found that no single intervention alone could reduce the occurrence of CAUTI development. Nurses must integrate several interventions to have an effective result at lowering the rates. However, this particular study found that after the use of the antimicrobial bundle, rates of CAUTI did decline. Roser et al. (2014) emphasized that education and awareness of
Also another serious complication of CAUTI is BSI (Blood stream infections) that can be fatal if not caught and treated promptly. “The Clinical Performance of Quality Health Care, along with Joint Commission” offers standards and objectives for facilities to assess measure and improve their standards at the lowest cost possible. The database covers nursing care and education, along with guidelines on prevention. Moreover the JCAHO regulatory standards for catheterized patients are explained and the documentation that is expected when JCAHO inspections are rendered in a facility. The source “Stop orders to reduce inappropriate urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients” states that by following standard precautions with every patient these infections can be prevented. . Also the source explored whether catheters should be used at all in an effort to decrease the incidence of CAUTI’s. Intermittent catheterizations along with supra-pubic were explored with a decreased incidence of bacteria being present in the bladder afterwards. The source “Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals” offered ways of cleansing and disinfecting the skin before insertion to reduce the risk of infection. Many CAUTI’s are linked to bacteria harboring in or around the site at insertion. By using not only aseptic technique but also cleansing the skin with chlorhexadine can decrease he incidence of infection
Getting an infection from improper care during or after insertion of a central line is the last thing you want to get while in the hospital. This paper will discuss Kaiser Permanente’s policy on central venous catheter, also known as a central line, care and dressing change, and whether it follows the current evidence-based practice on preventing bloodstream infection in patients who have them inserted. I will explain about what a central line is, why evidence-based practice is important in the clinical setting, what Kaiser Permanente’s policy about central line care and dressing change is, if Kaiser is currently following evidence-based practice based on current articles about preventing central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), and what my role in using evidence-based practice is as a future registered nurse.
Usage of indwelling urinary catheters in critically ill patients can seem to be a permanent fixture in intensive care units. Most critical care nurse expect their patients to have an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) in place without much regard to the risk of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) or the ability to implement IUC alternatives. Critical care patients may require IUC usage due to diagnosis, need for accurate hourly intake and output measurements, or other specified documented reasons. The risk of acquiring a catheter associated urinary tract infections is a result of IUC usage. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-associated
Article by Clancy (2009) explained central lines were a result of an estimated 250,000 blood stream infections and accounted for 30,000 to 62,000 patient deaths, then adding that each infection cost upwards of $36,000 and cumulatively add up to at least $9 billion in preventable costs annually. The article also explains how the mindset has changed from the cost of having a central line in place and expecting complications to lowering infection rates by an intentional interventional process/s. The article speaks of 5 basic steps to reduce CLABSI, hand washing, insertion techniques, skin cleansing, avoidance of certain sites and earlier removal of the CVC. Studies showed that these guidelines were only followed 62% of the time. The system was changed to ascertain that all the clinicians were in compliance. This prompted 5 interventions, education, a CVC insertion cart with all necessary equipment, physicians having to validate central line necessity, a concise checklist for bedside clinicians and the empower of nurses to stop procedures if guidelines were not followed. These low cost interventions from 11.3/1000 in catheter days in 1998 to zero in the fourth quarter of 2002.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common nosocomial infection; accounting for up to 40% of infections reported by acute care hospitals. Up to 80% of UTIs are associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. Catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) represent the largest proportion of healthcare associated infections (HAI). Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) increases hospital cost and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality .CAUTIs are considered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to represent a reasonably preventable complication of hospitalization. As such, no additional payment is provided to hospitals for CAUTI treatment-related costs.CAUTIs can lead to
Central line associated blood stream infection, better known as CLABSI, are on a continual rise in critical patients. CLABSI are implemented to help improve vascular access in patients where venous access is minimal or reduced. They help to maintain intraveneous access to deliver medications to the body and in case of emergency. Central lines are not given to every patient admitted into the hospital, only those who are critical. The purpose of this paper is to provide reasoning and evidence behind my research strategy for this particular topic. In the critical populations, how does not using chlorhexidine containing dressing compare to using the dressings influence the central line associated blood stream infection rates over two years.
Catheter associated bloodstream infection (CRBSI) occurring in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are frequent, complication related to it are potentially fatal and costly (Kim & Sandra, 2009). According to the center of disease control, an approximate of two hundred and fifty thousand cases of CRBSIs have been estimated to occur annually which cause health care to cost approximately twenty five thousand dollars per case, and between 500 to 4,000 patient die due to blood stream infection (CDC, 2002). Approximately 90 percent of blood stream infection occurs from central venous insertion (CVC). Even though CRBSI occurs from different ways, the most common source is contamination of the catheter by skin flora on insertion, skin flora
UCDMC has dropped from an “A” grade to a “B” grade starting in the Fall of 2016 to present because infection prevention performance has fallen below average (LeapFrog Group, 2017). The infection report from LeapFrog corresponds with the SNI’s infection report for 2016 and 2017. Numerous CAUTI occur in the hospital nationwide each year and costs approximately $250 million (Agency for healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2016). CAUTIs are preventable and can
Every year, up to 249,000 BSIs occur within hospitals in the US. Apparently, 32.2% of these BSIs do occur in the ICUs (Chopra, Krein, Olmsted, Safdar & Saint, 2013)The apparent bias in prevalence of BSIs within the ICUs is associated with the increased utilization of the CVCs within these units since they deal with a majority of critical care situations.
The focus of this paper is to compare the current hospital policy of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center’s (SCVMC) Central Venous Catheter (CVC) maintenance policies and procedure to current EBP suggestions. Current EBP practices suggest no differences of central line care SCVMC’s policies. This paper will
Another research article about the use of 2% chlorhexidine for daily skin cleansing was established by Munoz-Price and implemented by the task force. Munoz-Price demonstrated that this intervention reduces the rate of CLABSI from 9.5 to 3.8 per 1000 catheter days. The task force also replaced the administration sets and add-on devices no more frequently than every 72 hours unless contamination occurred. Replacing tubing used to administer blood, blood products, or lipids within 24 hours of start of infusion was also monitored, along with changing IV port protectors no more often than 72
Article reference (in APA style): Sofroniadou, S., Revela, I., Smirloglou, D., Makriniotou, I., Zerbala, S., Kouloubinis, A., & ... Iatrou, C. (2012). Linezolid versus Vancomycin Antibiotic Lock Solution for the Prevention of Nontunneled Catheter-related Blood Stream Infections in Hemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study. Seminars In Dialysis, 25(9), 344-350. doi:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00965.x