The Obligation To Endure By Rachel Carson Analysis

Carson’s primary argument is that the ecosystem is unable to adjust and rebalance itself due to the rapidity of the introduction of chemicals into the environment. She points to the common knowledge that it took hundreds of millions of years for life to evolve to its current state. She goes on to explain how, given time (eons), the environment adjusted to natural dangers such as radiation emitted from certain rocks and short-wave radiation from the sun, but that it is impossible for the earth to adjust and rebalance in the face of man-made threats in the relative miniscule timeframe of decades. Her appeal is both logical and emotional. Logically, chemicals sprayed on croplands, forests or gardens will kill not just “pests” but other living organisms, and that some amount of these chemicals will end up in ground water, causing problems for anyone or anything that depends on this water. Emotionally if the possibility of permanent gene damage, which cause deformities, cancers, and early death, is not enough to encourage a second look at this issue then there is no hope for the planet’s future.

In fact, Carson outlines her evidence and claims for the global environment and the whole of humanity. In addition to this, it is worthy to mention that, Carson was directing her message to policymakers because they had the power to ban the manufacture of the pesticides and insecticides. Furthermore, Carson’s messages were directed at certain companies and the manufacturers of pesticides such as DDT. The catalyst of this message stemmed from the widespread use of insecticides both at home and in offices. As it seemed, there was a widespread rate of ignorance and misinformation across the public on the harmful effects of these pesticides.

Rachel Carson is a noted biologist who studies biology, a branch of science addressing living organisms, yet she has written a book called Silent Spring to speak about the harmful effects of pesticides on nature. Carson doesn’t write about birds’ genetic and physical makeup, the role of them in the animal food chain, or even how to identify their unbelievable bird songs, yet strongly attests the fight for a well developed environment containing birds, humans, and insects is just and necessary. To Carson, the war for a natural environment is instantly essential for holding on to her true love for the study of biology. Thus Carson claims that whether it be a direct hit towards birds or an indirect hit towards humans and wildlife, farmers need to understand the effects and abandon the usage of pesticides in order to save the environment by appealing to officials, farmers, and Americans in her 1962 book, Silent Spring. She positions her defense by using rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questioning to establish logos, juxtaposing ideas, and using connotative and denotative diction.

In her essay “The Obligation to Endure”, Rachel Carson alerts the public to the dangers of modern industrial pollution. She writes about the harmful consequences of lethal materials being released into the environment. She uses horrifying evidence, a passionate tone, audience, and the overall structure of her essay to express to her readers that the pollution created by man wounds the earth. There are many different ways that pollution can harm the environment, from the nuclear explosions discharging toxic chemicals into the air, to the venomous pesticides sprayed on plants that kills vegetation and sickens cattle. The adjustments to these chemicals would take generations. Rachel

Carson speaks about the diminishment of us as a human being. With the amount of harmful pesticides we use without fully understanding its consequences, we are slowly killing our human race. When pesticides are sprayed on crops and insects, they end up getting into our bodies. Adopting the easy way of getting rid of insects is harming us in the long run.

The banning of insecticide, a major pollutant and neurotoxin, has been up for debate for a significant period of time. However,

In 17 chapters, many of which can stand alone as essays, Carson develops a deceptively simple premise: the use and overuse of synthetic chemicals to control insect pests introduces these chemicals into the air, water, and soil and into the food chain where they poison animals and humans, and disrupt the many intricate

Individuals kill bees every day. Some ways that bees are killed by people are with pesticides such as ‘Round Up’ to protect crops. While Round Up specifies the product is safe and will not harm bees, there is chemical found within the containments called 4-dioxane. This chemical is revealed to cause tumors in vermin and exterminate insects. As insignificant as it may seem, every small decision such as using Round Up, helps contribute to mass extinction. The first

In the book Silent Spring, Rachel Carson’s main concern is the widespread use of synthetic pesticides and their impact on the environment. Carson concentrates on a commonly used pesticide in the 1950s called DDT. She opposes the indiscriminate spraying of DDT because it has profound consequences on the environment, humans and animals. Carson collected information about how the DDT can cause cancer in humans, harm animals such as birds and remained in the environment for long periods of time. Subsequently, the chemicals in the pesticides are extremely harmful so she tries to raise awareness and convince others that there are better alternatives.

“There is a strong scientific consensus that bees are exposed to neonicotinoid pesticides in the fields and suffer harm from the doses received, according to a new analysis of all the scientific evidence to date.” (Carrington, 2015). I will argue the idea that the exposure to the neonicotinoid insecticides are one of the key causes of the population declination in bees. According to many studies, neonicotinoid insecticides physically harm bees as they inhibit their nervous system and they can no longer navigate their way home (Fischer et al, 2014). Bees are also crucial for the pollination of many crops around the world, without them, a great percent of our agricultural practices would suffer

Imagine a lifeless world scared by fire, covered in ash. A world in which nothing grows and not even the faintest of whispers are sounded across this dead planet. Here this ire silence lays in the wake of nature’s wrath. The remnants of a once magnificent world filled to bursting with the life hundreds of species are now all but gone. Fallen, has the beauty of this world. Erased from the memory of time with no trace of existence to be had. This planet is ours. We were the ones who killed it. In Rachel Carson’s “The Obligation to Endure,” a passion struck article, Carson paints us this picture of a world on the brink of utter

Goulson shows a battle in whether pesticides , which are regarded as the materials that can harm crop pollinator should be forbidden.According to his research ,the chemicals in the pesticides can spread widely through pollinators , and little of the toxin may lead to the death of the bees. What's more ,if the exposure of the chemical to very low levels of neonicotinoids that are not sufficient to kill the bees but can influence the abilities and the behaviors .There are also some other researches but they are not convincing because of some obvious shortcomings.On the other hand , neonicotinoids can provide economic benefits and those are difficult to substitute. As a result, it is still a controversy should those pesticides can be

There are many pesticides that are killing and destroying the bee’s community to develop in this planet earth. Bees are dying and are not populating due of the pesticides found in gardens and in our own backyards. In this article Jay Feinstein explains to us how bees are being killed even by our own selves. There are many pesticides used in this world for livestock and crops and researchers found that it causes the decrease of bees still living in our world and producing honey and many nutrients for us. Because of us we caused this problem to start and harmless insects are dying and getting hurt and that brings our world to a more difficult place to live in. So many researchers were observing different places in Indiana and to see if there

Rachel Carson played a pivotal role in shaping the Environmental Movement and American culture because of her honest, direct disclosure of the matters at hand. Although Carson was not the first person to make these scientific discoveries, she was able to radically change the way millions of Americans perceived the environment and the dangers of toxic chemicals to themselves through vivid, articulate, yet easily understandable language. For instance, in her chapter titled “Elixirs of Death,” she says “For these chemicals are now stored in the bodies of the vast majority of human beings, regardless of age. They

Rachel Carson makes a very valid point in “The Obligation to Endure.” These damages created by the people, like pollution and harmful chemicals in our environment are irreversible however raising awareness will make a change for good in the long run for the environment and for the health of humans. Humans is destroying the environment that has been around longer than humans themselves. Carson’s main issues are pollution and the spraying of chemicals that are altering our environment. Although these things currently show no visual effect on humans, they can end up being a danger in the long run. Carson wants to raise awareness and wants for the public to have enough knowledge before making long-term devastating decisions with disastrous effects. As Carson states, “There is still very limited awareness of the nature of the threat.” (499) Carson’s purpose is to raise awareness of the great dangers that are presented with these dangerous chemicals because she wants to stop humans from destroying