The Process of Choosing Jurors and Their Role Essay

The jury system has been used in the criminal trial since the Constitution stated “the trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury.”

Firstly, i want to touch on the subject of religious beliefs. Is that a good enough reason to not serve on a Jury? I do not believe so. Yes, the bible does tell us not to judge each other, because we all have sinned. But, does being a juror really means passing judgement in that sense? When a group of people participate on a jury they are usually presented with evidence, testimony from eye witness and/ or expert testimony, from professionals, such as psychologists. So, it is really judgement based on the evidence presented or lack thereof. Therefore, no one should be able to use religious belief as an excuse to not participate in the legal system of the democracy in which they are apart of.

Is the Jury System being Fair to the people? In the 5th century, around the Ancient Greece the jury system has been around at that time, but it might have emerged in New England during the 12th century. The Jury system or trial is a lawful proceeding in which a jury makes a decision on finding the details of the crime, which then direct the action of a judge would decide on. After the finding of facts the judge or panel of judges makes the decision on if the defiant is guilty or not.

Impartiality is said to be achieved during the random selection process of the jury empanelment as well as through the courts ability to exclude a person on the basis of their awareness of a particular person involved in or a witness in the case.

stated in the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution. People view the jury as an important part of citizens lives. Without the jury, judges would be in charge of deciding if people were guilty or innocent of crimes. People would have no ability to debate if the person accused was guilty or innocent. The jury system has a special role in the people’s right of popular sovereignty. These people are proud of the jury system and are glad it’s a

Did you know that the jury system’s principles originate all the way back into medieval England? Between 1154 and 1189, King Henry II put the jury system principles into effect. King Henry II allowed twelve “free and lawful men” to make decisions regarding land and inheritance disputes (“The History of Trial By Jury”). America used these ideas to create modern juries. I believe that the Founding Fathers gave juries too much freedom to make decisions in the courts because citizens hold biased power, citizens can be uneducated in the law, and citizens can be easily influenced by social media and other outside voices; therefore, changes should be made to the jury system.

According to the Sixth Amendment, everyone has the right to a fair jury, and in order to ensure this right, careful jury selection methods are used. Attorneys and judges use a process called "voir dire" to select a jury. In this process, the potential jurors are asked a cartain set of questions to decide who would make a suitable jury. Someone's religious views, education, opinions, knowledge on the case, experience with the law, and many other components are taken into consideration when choosing a jury.There are three types of challenges that can be raised to narrow down potential jurors: challenges to the array, challenges for cause, and peremptory

This essay will evaluate the argument for and against the jury system, discuss and evaluate proposed or recent reforms to the jury system in England and Wales. Finally, it will consider the alternatives to the current jury system.

The right to trial by jury in the modern times originates from twelfth century England during the reign of King Henry II. This system may originate from an “ancient right for an accused to be tried only “by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”” (Thomas). In the United States, trial by jury is mentioned in Article Three of the Constitution and the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments. For many people, the jury system seems to be the fairest system and most unbiased way of determining a person’s innocence or guilt. The system is to make sure that all receive fair trial despite their race, gender, national origin, religion, political affiliation, or color. Jury service is distinct in being the only form of civic

A jury is defined by a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment. The jury dates back to the Magna Carta in England, when it was said that no free man shall be imprisoned except by lawful judgement of his peers. The word ‘peer’ comes from a latin word meaning equal. These early jury trials were, however, based on tests of ‘good faith’ rather than on the facts in a legal dispute. To be judged by your peers means to be judged by persons with the same legal standing, ordinary members of the community. The Jury system reflects the idea that everyone in the community is responsible for the administration of justice. The

Serving on a jury is a civic duty and an American tradition. However, some people view jury duty as a chore or as an event that negatively interrupts their lives. Some independent studies have shown that even jury duty has a devastating effect on married life. Due to this and other extraneous situations, there are only a few people who actually want to serve on a jury. This may lead to efforts by potential jurors to, in some way get out of their duty in a jury. What we know of as the current jury duty system should be changed so citizens are not forced to serve in this capacity and can still be regarded as a responsible civilian. As per the status quo, a trial jury is a constitutional right, a jury of ones peers or equals. However,

Made of only twelve ordinary citizens, the jury is to create a verdict from the trial they attend, present it, and then be able to defend their verdict (Jordan, 2002, p.1). Before these twelve jurors are selected, certain individuals are randomly selected from the voters registration list and other different sources depending on the subject of location (Jordan, 2002, p.18). After the potential jurors are given an extensive voir dire, the jurors deemed qualified to participate in the case move on to the court where they take the oath and begin the trial (Jordan, 2002, p.20). The individuals of the jury then listen closely as evidence is being brought forward by both the prosecutor and the defense attorney. The jurors then evaluate the evidence that has been brought to them alongside the law and create a verdict (Jordan, 2002, p.20). When the jurors reach their verdict, they present their findings to the court (Jordan, 2002, p.20). The only way the jury is able to reach their verdict is with the evidence presented to them by the

To be a good juror there are a few key elements I believe are required. One good key element to have while being a juror is to listen effectively and take very good notes. You want to be able to have a very clear understanding of the case and take notes if you later forget minor details and want to remember. A second, key element to have while being a juror is to ask good questions. Being able to ask good questions can open up a more clear understanding of the case. Lastly, you want to listen and use all the evidence presented in an effective manner. This is important because sometimes evidence used can be false, as seen in the movie 12 angry men.

The selection of the jury is super important because you need people who aren't going to be biased about a certain situation or the race of the individual on trial so the verdict is fair. The selection of the jury has to be full of people who are honest, un-biased, not an impulsive decider, and not afraid to voice their opinions. I would look for juror's with these

Jurors are chosen in a fashion that combines both random selection and deliberate choice. This process occurs in three stages which include compiling a master list, summoning the venire and conducting voir dire. This brief will be focusing on the voir dire stage as it is essential to understand