preview

The Pros And Cons Of A Global Ban On Glitter

Decent Essays

There is a push from environmental scientists for a global ban on glitter. The art supply is made up of small plastic particles that eventually reach the ocean and the environment where animals eat it.
A proof of it was presented by Professor Richard Thompson who conducted research. He found that one-third of fish caught in the UK have the plastic particle. Because of its small size, the glitter will escape down the plughole and potentially enter the environment, Fox News reported.
Ban on glitter
Dr. Trisha Farrelly, an environmental anthropologist at Massey University in New Zealand, supported the call to ban glitter because it is microplastic. These are fragments of plastic smaller than 5 millimeters in length. There are estimates that up to 51 trillion fragments of microplastics are in the world’s oceans, The Independent reported.
It is not just marine animals, from planktons to whales, which ingest microplastics. It can end up in humans when they eat seafood.
Following the campaign by scientists and advocacy groups, the UK will ban microbeads in 2018. Microbeads are tiny particles made specifically for addition to health products and cosmetics. Ahead of the UK ban, some nurseries in Britain had prohibited the use of the glitter in its establishments because of the damage it does to the environment.
Cheryl Hadland, the director of Tops Day Nurseries, said that there are 22,000 nurseries throughout the UK. “If we’re all getting through kilos and kilos of glitter, we’re

Get Access