Abortion is a topic that polarizes large sections of the population against a minority; today more people who live and advocates for the criminalization of abortion than those who bet on their decriminalization; this is due mainly to the conservative formation that prevails in the whole world, and that is to the parallel of the religions and its moral doctrines.
It is after the French revolution, that with the name of left or liberalism, have arisen some minorities that bet by the abortion, the euthanasia and the union of pairs of the same sex.
These taboo themes have intensified in recent decades, because of the support that some nations have given to them, as happened in some US states. and of which they take as support and guide.
The same human rights defenders (hombusman) have fallen into doctrinal contradictions on this issue, since there are those who support the "freedom of women to decide on their body" and those who "support the right to life of someone defenseless" .
The discussion is essentially about leaving absolute control over the decision to the mother, de facto ignoring the rights of the child and the father, (in case of opposition), establishing as a law the permissiveness of the act of curettage.
It is after an alternative interpretation of morality and law, that in some parts of the world has established the right to quench a life, and decriminalize it as homicide, by depriving the human dignity of the infant, and put a volitional desire of the mother as
Abortion’s legalization through Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade, has allowed for one in three pregnancies to end in abortion. This means that 1.5 million abortions are performed in the United States each year (Flanders 3). It ranks among the most complex and controversial issues, arousing heated legal, political, and ethical debates. The modern debate over abortion is a conflict of competing moral ideas and of fundamental human rights: to life, to privacy, to control over one's own body. Trying to come to a compromise has proven that it one cannot please all of the people on each side of the debate.
The abortion question raises a number of issues that form the core of the abortion debate. Opponents and supporters of abortions have been battling over this particular problem for decades and still cannot come to an agreement. Being one of the most common and most controversial medical procedures, abortion tends to affect people on psychological and sociological levels. But while the discussion of the morality of abortion is an ongoing debate, the social issues surrounding abortion in most cases stay unnoticed. The social aspect of the issue is centered on the abortion policy. The main question of the abortion policy is whether the law should permit abortions and, if so under what circumstances. The other is whether the law should put the life of an unborn child first and legally protect it. The peculiarity of the abortion policy is that its measures are highly dependent on different public opinions.
There are many limitations valued when it comes to the right of abortion. The news media still outlines the pros and cons of anti-abortion rights in certain-states-to soon, the entire country. My perspectives on the issue of abortion have been entitled from it to never be banned among citizen’s rights. The reproduction of pregnancy has been emphasized heavily on a mother’s decision to abort their child, but the father of the child plays an active role since he considers to that particular title. Through this current issue, majority of the people against abortion do not seem to have an open mind to how much it primarily affects the decision of the mother amongst her own views of considering abortion.
The debate about abortion focuses on two issues; 1.) Whether the human fetus has the right to life, and, if so, 2.) Whether the rights of the mother override the rights of the fetus. The two ethicists who present strong arguments for their position, and who I am further going to discuss are that of Don Marquis and Judith Thomson. Marquis' "Future Like Ours" (FLO) theory represents his main argument, whereas, Thomson uses analogies to influence the reader of her point of view. Each argument contains strengths and weaknesses, and the point of this paper is to show you that Marquis presents a more sound argument against abortion than Thomson presents for it. An in depth overview of both arguments will be
The restrictions and the debate that surrounds the issue of abortion has changed dramatically throughout the course of history and it continues to change until this very moment. All around the world and in every known society, women have used abortion to control their reproduction, regardless of it’s legality. Abortion used to be exercised freely in the United Sates, up Until all the states started to ban It and place a lot of restrictions on it. They stated that a woman can not abort except in extreme cases in which the mother’s life might be in danger. After the restrictions caused a lot of health issues and raised concerns on women’s health, The Government abolished all the restrictions. In this paper I will analyze and discuss three main positions on the issue of abortion. First, there are those who associate themselves with the title “pro-life”. These individuals are anti abortion, birth control, embryo research or anything that can control or cause any harm to the fetus. Second, there are those who at the other end of the spectrum who firmly believe that if a woman decides to abort, then it is her constitutional right to do so without any interference from the government. Third, are those who believe that if a woman is raped or her life is in danger, then abortion should be completely and solely up to the woman, but other than that, abortion should be illegal. This group of individuals are also for birth control and do not oppose educating
It is clear that many individuals concentrate on the rights and suffering of the unborn baby, but overlook the rights and suffering of the pregnant woman. The society and policy makers would therefore be entangled in a dilemma of such a situation where the rights and suffering of both the unborn child and the pregnant mother have to be put into consideration. Therefore, the policymakers and other stakeholders should pass those policies without compromising the rights and sufferings of the mother and at the same time justify that it is not worth taking away an innocent life. Dialogue regarding making these policies should be interactive, civil and substantial for it to be
Abortion is a legal medical method to stop the premature delivery that is adopted in most countries of the world. It was legalized many years ago but nowadays we live in the civilized society where the human life is the most precious treasure and the question about the appropriateness of abortions is of current importance. Nowadays there are two opposing camps who present their arguments. People who support abortion insist that prohibition of it will deprive people of their rights to have free choice. On the contrary, people who stand for banning abortion claim that abortion deprive a human being from the right to live. Every person must decide for himself what is more important: deprivation of choice or deprivation of life. Another point
The pro-choice camp believes the providence of choice to abort is vital for gender equality. As Thomson (1971) believes, one’s body belongs to oneself which it is morally permissible for a woman to make her own choice towards her unexpected pregnancy. Furthermore, compared to men, women may be more affected by pregnancy which it might disrupt their education, career or family life. Hence, pregnancy to a woman could be an important issue due to its impact. Therefore, illegalizing abortion may be seen as a constraint of women’s right to freedom of choice when abortion could be such an important issue to them. Also, it could be seen as a limitation to their bodily integrity and the right to control their fertility when the choice of termination
Abortion has many issues to be put into consideration, especially in case of unwanted pregnancies. They normally have effects that are majorly negative on both the children and the women. According to women’s point of view and other feminists, abortion should not only be considered as freedom of choice and overlook other considerations. Considerations like only women and not men can bear children, they are subjected to sexual breaches, they are not engaged as much as men in political or familial decision-making and
The definition of abortion is the discontinuation cycle of the pregnant female. It also consists of the removal of a fetus, or an embryo that is ineligible for survival (Brittanica’s Editorial Staff 1). The definition of abortion is not as simple as the debate over the abortion issue. A statement is never censored in the aspect of human life, but simply left open for awareness. A defenseless baby, who has not yet had the chance to breathe and function as a human being, is frowned upon by many unsupported abortion advocates. However, the reflecting opposite is just as responsive. It is a female's right to appoint what happens to her body, and she should not feel compelled to if she decides not to bring a child into existence. So many questions can arise by such a serious debate, but we must look at both views of the issue to better apprehend it.
The last issue surrounds maternal- foetal conflicts has been the state intervention that requires that all women who are pregnant take care of their pregnancy without a help from the state (Mahowald, 2012). In doing so the state leaves the responsibility to individual parents irrespective of their position in the society. In doing so the state directly punishes women who cannot cater for all their needs in the society. It also places an unnecessary unfair burden to such women. Most of the maternal restrictions would have better off if they were being enforced by parents (Mahowald,
Abortion is one of the contentious issues and mostly discussed problems of human life. According to the statistics provided by the World Health Organization there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions in the world each year, that is approximately 125,000 abortions per day. Some countries banned the procedure of abortion, while others have put no restriction on the provisions relating abortion (Makenzius, 2012, p. 11). Therefore, nowadays there are different debates around this concept that divide into two ethical positions: pro-choice and pro-life. The basic question in this debate sounds like “Are you for or against abortion?”, or with another words "Are you pro-choice or pro-life?" Consequently, there are people who advocate a right to
Abortion is a rather sensitive topic that carries various and strong personal opinions. The first question is what is an abortion? Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by removing or expelling the fetus or embryo from the uterus before it is ready for birth. It has become one of the most controversial arguments in the world having to decide between pro-choice or pro-life. Religious conservatives side with the opinion that being pro-choice is a crime and a sin. Juxtaposed to the right to life opinion is the pro-choice advocates. The pro-choice argues that a women should have the right to decide what she personally does with her body. During debates, both sides often present valid arguments towards support or rejection of their
Although, seen as a mainly as woman’s issue, the rights do set responsibility of family size, the spacing of children and composition with the family itself, without any official govern-ment influence. The document further states that these rights are to be enjoyed, “free of discrimi-nation, coercion and violence” (United Nations Population Division). An article from the Univer-sity of Tulsa School of Law provides an enhanced explanation of reproductive rights and directly confronts the use of forced abortions, “…giving birth is a basic human right and is not to be in-terfered with by government.” The article also states “to punish a woman and her unborn child for a natural consequence often beyond their control is the epitome of cruelty (Hampton
This essay has discussed the major views of the moral status of the foetus including the Roman Catholic Church’s view, the gradualist view and the fertilisation view. The Roman Catholic Church believes that all human life is sacred from conception to death and therefore all life has equal moral status. The Roman Catholic Church displays the sanctity of life perspective in its view. The gradualist view believes that the foetus receives moral status gradually with respect to the rate of its development. Therefore the foetus also gradually receives status as a person. The fertilisation view holds the opinion that the foetus receives moral status at the moment of fertilisation. This moral status that the foetus receives is equal to the moral status of all human beings. The