preview

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Decent Essays

In 2014 a group organization called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) noted that more than 100 million animals are harmed or killed during animal testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being used for medical testing, but are not being cared for before, during, or after testing. Animals and humans are very similar, in that we have the same organ system which performs the same tasks in a similar fashion. Even though animals and humans share comparable DNA, we fail to see the similarities in physical and emotional pain that animals endure during testing. Subjecting even one animal to that type of cruelty, all in the name of science is one too many.
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 2016, 71,370 animals suffered both physical and emotional pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief. Among these animals were 1,272 nonhuman primates, 5,771 rabbits, 24,566 guinea pigs, and 33,280 hamsters. These numbers are astounding. Is it not possible for medical testing to be done on inanimate objects? Are animals the only choice? And, does animal testing really prove how safe new medical treatments are for humans? Yes, we share similar DNA but we also both feel pain. …show more content…

As noted in /www.change.org/p/petition-reduction-of-animal-testing-to-reduce-government-waste-at-tax-payers-expense, the USA spends $16 billion dollars annually for animal testing at taxpayers' expense and is subject to massive waste and mismanagement of taxpayers' dollars. That is a lot of money wasted on animal testing when a majority of the time the testing itself isn't advantageous to the medical field. The U.S. taxpayer's money is being wasted on testing that isn't always effective medically but is always traumatic for the animals being used for testing. Can humanity be bought? Does humanity have a price

Get Access