The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

Death penalty is also known as capital punishment or execution. Societies from all over the world have used this sentence at one point in history, in order to avenge criminals. Most common reasons for being sentenced to death were war crimes, war treason, murder and espionage. Back then, the capital punishment was almost always accompanied by torture, and executions were public. The most used execution method was by hanging. If an inmate chooses the electric chair it takes anywhere between 2 min and 15 minutes. The criminal receives a jolt between 500 and 2000 volts for every 30 seconds, attending doctor waits for body to cool after each bolt and check if the heart is still breathing. While in some societies, violent death penalties are still being employed – like shooting, hanging, electric chair and gas chamber – in most countries, these have been replaced with a painless method – the lethal injection. When the person is put to death for the death penalty they use a lethal injection execution, in most cases. Sodium thipal makes the person go deeply unconscious but unable to feel himself being paralyzed from the “pancuronium bromide”. On death row an inmate waited an average of 15 years between sentencing and execution but a quarter of inmates die on death row from natural cases. The time has come to make punishment fit the crime, too oppose lethal injection, but not because these untried new drugs might obituary cause pain, but cause confusion, lethal injection conflates

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, eighteen states have abolished the death penalty since its implementation (Facts About the Death Penalty). But what are the reasons behind doing so? Historically, public policy concerning capital punishment has shifted dramatically, from required capital punishment to jury nullification to a rise in the abolition of the practice. Public opinion has shifted alongside policy, with more and more Americans disapproving of the death penalty and the morality behind it, citing it as an inhumane and hypocritical approach to justice and punishment. I am with the the more progressive Americans that do not believe in administering the death penalty under any circumstances. Rather, I support life imprisonment or the insanity defense for capital offenses whenever appropriate. Capital punishment is ineffective because it lowers the state down to the level of the defendant, frequently discriminates against racial minorities and those of lower socioeconomic status, and it has been abolished in nearly every other modern democratic country.

People and courts often justify capital punishment as society’s moral duty to safeguard the safety and well-being of its citizens. According to Miriam-Webster, capital punishment is the practice of killing people as punishment for serious crimes. Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being. There is much controversy in the punishment of offenders who have committed murder. It is the maximum sentence a person can receive if the crime of murder is committed. Some would say it is inhumane and not a real punishment because the person cannot serve an experience punishment through death. Other perceive death as being just because of the belief in “Eye for an eye.” The pros and cons differ as to whether it is effective in

The death penalty is put into place when a person of some sort commits murder or rape or something to an extreme extent, is lethally injected and put to death because of the crime.

Capital punishment is a failed and outdated government practice. The death penalty denies citizens of civil liberties and is in direct conflict with the values of the democratic system. American citizens have fallen victim to the penalty of execution and it is time we demand action. For centuries capital punishment has been the subject for criticism; according to Deathpenalty.procon.org, back in the late seventeen hundreds an Italian Jurist name Beccaria, "The first prominent European to call for an end to the death penalty, Beccaria is considered the founder of the modern abolition movement. He published a prolific article about Crimes and Punishments; it was the first key study of the criminal justice system as it functioned in eighteenth-century Europe; it was also the first to call for the abolishment of capital punishment. It still stands as the greatest significant attack on the death penalty ever published. With that being said, today we are still going through this continuous battle to abolish capital punishment.

A long, notorious trial, where the ultimate crime is committed, is taking place. Hard work and long hours contribute to the trial. Countless evidence and testimony is reviewed allowing the jury to settle on a verdict. As the jury reaches its verdict convicting the defendant guilty, the judge begins sentencing giving the man a chance of life in prison without parole or a sentence to death. But what is the greatest punishment given to those convicted of capital punishment, is it life in prison or the death penalty? The death penalty dates back to ancient times and has been around since then. Today it is still practice but has been debated whether it is constitutional and if it should still be used today and in the future.”We should construct our punishments more nearly to fit their crimes -- neither much more nor much less than what they deserve”(Blecker). Those who commit grisly acts of capital offenses should be made to pay the ultimate price and sentenced to the death penalty.

Capital punishment has been a controversial and a central part of political debates for decades. As the result of being a complex dispute, there are multiple, common perspectives on how it should be resolved. However, most citizens of the United States identify with one of two sides, those for and those against its continued use. Most commonly, the death penalty is used in gruesome murder trials and some other offenses, such as treason, espionage, and airplane hijacking. Those for it, tend to believe that it is necessary to keep these criminals out of society and that it deters crime, while those against tend to believe that the practice is medieval and unethical in society today. With a controversial topic like the death penalty, it is important to determine why this controversy exists and if there is a possible solution. The focus at hand is whether or not the United States Government should continue its use of the death penalty and how this answer could be implemented.

The United States Constitution was based on the principles of what was right. It presented a radical new system of government, to right the wrongs of the past, to create a more perfect society. However, the Constitution has led to many disagreements on its interpretation. In the case of capital punishment, while the Constitution does not explicitly outline its practice, it offers insight to how such systems should be excluded from American Society. For this reason, the death penalty clearly acts in violation of multiple amendments that protect American citizens. As the death penalty violates the 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments, it is an unconstitutional practice that should be outlawed.

There are vast differences in the way people view capital punishment. Some view it as a deterrent, and some view it as sanctioned murder. Capital punishment has been a part of society for hundreds and hundreds of years. Recently, as society has become more civilized, capital punishment has been questioned and asked if it is the right way to handle crime. This subject is highly controversial. Both sides’ thoughts on whether capital punishment is right or wrong are highly based on morality and opinions. This essay’s main goal is to show the factual and statistical sides of these arguments.

Capital punishment, also known to as the death penalty, has a long history in human society. It has been applied to the United State for decades. Since 1976, there are 1,446 executions have been taken place in the United State. Under the United State constitution law, states reserve the right to apply their own criminal laws, which means there are states have abolished capital punishment while others have enforced the death penalty. In states that retain capital punishment, the majority of execution method is lethal injection. But there are few states still authorize a range of other methods such as gas inhalation, firing squad, or electrocution. Clearly, capital punishment is lawfully and is accepted by many legislators. However, this idea of a legalized murder is illogical, immoral and inhumane. First, even though many people support the death penalty, but a very few of them actually witness an execution or understand the feeling of everyone who involves in the execution. An execution usually is hidden from citizens due to its reality of cruel and inhumane. A designated prisoner was brought into a room with a fulfillment of deathly equipment and people who were going to execute him, but he had never met before. These executors are usually nonmedical-trainer volunteers but will ultimately and shortly be involved in a complicated medical situation. As a matter of fact, our society has spent a lot of efforts making sure that criminals are in as least pain as possible. Thus,

The law on this planet, and for this society, will not include the death penalty. I will explain my decision, while showing alternative punishments to the death penalty. The punishments have to be harsh so people are discouraged to violate the law. Punishments for other crimes will also be discussed, but in lesser detail. The crimes include, theft, trespassing, and littering. To improve this society, a crime will be punished whether it be a misdemeanor or a crime against humanity. The degree of the punishment will differ, but the society needs to understand violating the law is wrong.

Capital punishment, death penalty or execution is government sanctioned punishment by death. The sentence is referred to as a death sentence. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are also known as capital crimes or capital offences. Thirty-six countries have actively practice capital punishment, 103 countries have completely abolished it for all crimes, six have abolished it for ordinary crimes while maintaining it for special circumstances such as war crimes, and 50 have abolished it de facto, meaning they have not used it for at least ten years and/or are under moratorium. Capital punishment is a matter of active controversy because it is endorsing violence as the only solution for violence, because it is a violation of human rights and because of the millions misspent by taxing people for it.

Capital punishment is defined in the dictionary as, “the practice of killing people as punishment for serious crimes” (“capital punishment”). Murder is defined in the dictionary as, “the crime of unlawfully killing a person, especially with a malice aforethought” (“murder”). If murder is wrong, what does that make of capital punishment? The only difference between these two is that one is a legal form of murder and the other is not. There are currently 31 states that use the death penalty that should abolish it on the grounds of: accidentally executing an innocent, the high-cost of carrying out an execution, trauma to families and executioners, and for the simplest reason of all, “to end the perpetual cycle of violence…it is wrong to teach killing is wrong by killing” (Fisanick 29)

Capital punishment has been a recurring, controversial issue throughout the history of the United States of America. When an individual is accused for a heinous crime such as murder, one of their sentences could possibly be the death penalty. Taking a life for a life seems simple on the surface, but in reality, there are many setbacks and controversies that come with it. Capital punishment has been around for a while but it hasn’t been contested as much as it has today. People who are for the death penalty believe that these criminals are a threat to society and should be terminated. People who are against the death penalty often believe that taking someone’s life is cruel and unusual punishment, thus being unconstitutional. Despite the feud between the two arguments, capital punishment still persists in many states in the US today. There are some people who are even caught in the middle of the two opposing arguments. The issue is often brought up in courts and is constantly bothersome to the political process of the United States. Also, it is one of the most dire and important issues that are consistently brought up in the media today. Due the mass amounts of controversy this topic receives, it should be a problem that the United States makes a priority to resolve.

Cruel and unusual or appropriate and justifiable? Capital punishment is a hotly debated topic that often divides opinion. There are three sides to every story: the criminals, the victims, and the laws a society elects to have. I happen to believe that capital punishment is a justifiable consequence of horrendous crimes where loss of life occurred. Furthermore, this extreme punishment must be reserved for very specific crimes and there should be no question of guilt.