The Pros And Cons Of Eavesdropping

In 1928, the United States Supreme Court approved the practice of wiretapping for the police and other government officials, though some states have banned it. (Harris, 2017) Wiretapping is regulated by both the state and federal governments and, if illegal, can be punished by criminal sanctions. When an officer observes unusual conduct which leads to reasonably to conclude that criminal activity may be afoot, the officer may make reasonable inquiries aimed at confirming or dispelling the officer's suspicions.

The PATRIOT Act abuses the privacy of American citizens. It has denied the nationals of this nation of a portion of the essential rights that were guaranteed to them in the Constitution. The rights that the PATRIOT Act puts into jeopardy are intrinsic and it is the responsibility to secure our inherent rights. The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was marked into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. Its title is a ten-letter acronym (USA PATRIOT) that stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. After the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon the United States has created relief controls

The NSA, or National Security Agency, is an American government intelligence agency responsible for collecting data on other countries and sometimes on American citizens in order to protect the country from outside risks. They can collect anything from the people’s phone data to their browser history and use it against them in the court of law. Since the catastrophes of September 11 attacks, the NSA’s surveillance capabilities have grown with the benefit of George W. Bush and the Executive Branch (Haugen 153). This decision has left a country divided for fifteen years, with people who agree that the NSA should be strengthened and others who think their powers should be limited or terminated. Although strengthening NSA surveillance may help the

Federal supervision of electronics has been prevalent since the 60's, and has become increasingly intrusive with laws such as the ECPA and USA PATRIOT Acts. These laws authorized the legal surveillance of foreigners, and Americans abroad. However, with the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act requiring communication companies to provide backdoors for government use, agencies such as the National Security Agency have abused their powers in secrecy. More recently, Edward J. Snowden released NSA files that revealed the agency to illicitly engage in unwarranted surveillance of Americans both abroad and at home. (Introduction to Domestic Surveillance: Current Controversies)

Law professor Paul Ohm, in an article titled “That’s No Phone. That’s My Tracker”, writes “Every year, private companies send millions of dollars developing new services that track, store and share words, movement and even the thoughts of their customers.” We see their privacy being broken in the novel 1984 and realize that we are experiencing the same type of surveillance in our economy. NBC News, in an article FBI Abandoned Carnivore Wiretap Software writes, “FBI… popular commercial wiretap software because it was less expensive and had improved in it’s ability to copy E-mails and other communications of a targeted internet account without affecting their subscribers. Government officials use this kind of technology to keep track of our information and movement to assure we are no threat to our

Eavesdropping is when an attacker snoops or sniffs on a victim’s communication for example an attacker has access to the victim’s network and they can listen in or read the traffic flowing through the network. This is the biggest security vulnerability that admin’s have to face in an organisation, it cannot be prevented but it can be greatly reduced by strong encryption services making it harder to read data by others.

(1) telephone taps, internet taps and voice mails - which allow the government to tap these devises - with a court order. All telephones used by the individual/suspect may be tapped without a separate order from the court for each devise in question. The government is also able to seize voice mail/messages that are in question as being evidence. This is something to keep in mind: At least 25 police departments own a Stingray, a

Title 2 of the Patriot Act expanded the government’s surveillance program and gave them the power to circumvent legal regulations in order to obtain information. As a result, the government was able intercept internet communications and conduct roving wiretaps. Roving wiretaps were especially controversial because the government was given the ability to monitor devices without specifying the device to be tapped (“USA

Since then, people have obtained a large variety of new and diverse communications devices. In 2001, the USA Patriot Act was established after the 9/11 horror, which changed the specifications of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) wiretaps regarding particularity from one instrument to one person (any property/device associated with him/her). This way, law enforcement authorities were finally allowed to catch up with technological

Yes, the placement of an electronic listening device in a public location, but where a reasonable expectation of privacy is upheld is a fourth amendment violation, which will require a warrant “search and seize” the private conversations.

In our society the government watches and listens to us and we don't even know it. They tap into phones

There is precedent for Snowden’s charges, as the court that supervises and manages the NSA spying decided that the agency’s domestic pursuit violated the Fourth Amendment’s constraint against arbitrary searches and seizures “on at least one occasion” (Kelley, 2013). The documents have also been validated assertions made by other whistleblowers, and increase genuine questions about the justice and honesty of what looks to be extensive lawless surveillance with dishonorable oversight. Georgetown law professor Laura K. Donohue wrote in the Washington Post, “As a constitutional matter, the Supreme Court has long held that, where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, search and seizure may occur only once the government has obtained

“The consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival” (Orwell). The world today is full of many dangers domestic and abroad. It has become a routine in the news to report on the daily mass shooting or update with the war on terror. We live in a world where being worried is justified; however, we should not give up our constitutional rights in the face of fear. The NSA’s dragnet surveillance programs, such as PRISM, are both ineffective and are surpassed by less questionable national security programs. The FISA court's’ approval of NSA actions are not only illegal, but exist as an embarrassing formality. Surveillance is a necessary

The cause of terrorist attacks like 9/11 tragedy the government has ramped ups the security and surveillance of the activist, journalist and dissidents. It is no secret that the government are able to have assess of people phone call records and text messages but for that reason that, activists avoid using telephones, instead they use tools like Skype. Which they think they are immune to interception but they are wrong. Over the last years there has been an industry of companies who provide surveillance technology to the government, technology that allows the government to hack into computers. Rather that intercepting the commutations as they go over the wire, instead the government now hacks into your computer, enable your webcam and your microphone and able to steal and look through documents from your computer. In the article “ Quasi- Constitutional Protection and Government Surveillance” by Emily Berman argues “ The government may collect and analyze unprecedented amounts of information about U.S persons’ communications, but without concomitant safeguards against infringing on individual privacy” (781). According to this, it indicates that all the access the government is able to see and how it is invading American’s privacy.

Eavesdropping is the unapproved real-time interception of a private transmission, for example, a telephone call, text, video conferencing and fax transmission. The term eavesdrop gets from the act of really remaining under the roof of a house, listening to discussions inside. Eavesdropping is very easy to perform with IP-based calls as compare to TDM-based