The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

The gun law controversy has been a public debate for the past few decades. With the current state of the nation, it is not uncommon to see mass shooting occur in schools, churches, and in public. The most recent current events would illustrate the use of these weapons can cause massive death rates: the church in Texas being attacked by an individual with a domestic abuse history, the country concert event in Las Vegas, even the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting and the death of children who could not defend themselves. As onlookers watch these events unfold, ideas of creating more laws to regulate guns arise and a national push for legislation to act is engaged. Countering this movement are those who would oppose more laws as the fear that rights would be trampled, and personal safety removed. The answer to this heated debate of strict gun control laws is not to take them away; they are put into place with the intent to govern the safety of our society.

Have you ever wondered what it's like to have life and then in a blink of an eye it's gone? I have. I always wonder am I just going to die and see black or is there really life after death? People that lose their lives due to gun violence, their families have experienced this first hand.I am for stricter gun control laws.

The article “Gun Control Laws: Should the United States adopt stronger gun control laws?” focuses on the debate on passing stricter gun control laws. For example, supporters believe that gun control laws will decrease mass shootings and gun violence. Additionally, adopting these laws does not violate the Second Amendment, and as a result it does not limit the government from the use of fire arms when it is necessary. However, opponents argue that the gun control laws will not stop gun violence. The problem is the people holding the gun and not the gun itself. Furthermore, opponents gathered that stronger gun control laws do violate the Second Amendment. The author illustrates the debate on whether the United States should or should not adopt stronger gun control laws.

A DAY HAPPENS like any other day. Then some guy asks you for all of your card information. You refuse. He then pulls a Vector (a sub-machine gun, still fully automatic) and points it right at you. Luckily, the police pull up and take him away for illegal assault. Automatic guns and rifles are banned for civilian use, mostly because of how dangerous they are. This is the gun control law.

What gun control laws are going to help stop mass shootings? Even if the government banned the sale of assault rifles and guns in general,people with bad intentions are going to purchase them illegally. In the three recent mass shooting that caused many deaths, the shooters got their guns illegally with no trace of the sale on these weapons. Sandy Hook,Columbine,and San Bernardino were all mass shootings where the shooters got their guns illegally, stole the gun from family members or other people, and caused a lot of danger and harm to people. There would be no regulations to stop them because even if there were stricter gun laws, they still would be able to purchase their guns illegally.Stricter gun laws will not prevent crime,people will still get illegal firearms,and no sales to the public will reduce revenue.

Following the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, lawmakers have begun reconsidering the gun laws that are currently in place. Many states have previously implemented “red flag laws” (Johnson 2). However, after the recent events, lawmakers are debating on whether or not those laws are enough. Of course, to most people, stronger gun control laws seems like an obvious decision, but it is not that easy. Gun control laws are complicated. It is a “balancing act in the United States between public safety and the right to bear arms” (Mueller 2). Lawmakers must carefully balance the safety and constitutional rights of citizens. This is difficult to do when everyone has different values and points of view.

There have been protests for stricter gun control laws such as banning assault weapons and stronger background checks. Especially after all the mass shootings that have occurred in the past years. Many of those incidents could have been prevented if gun laws had been stricter. More restrictive gun control laws target gun violence and crimes. House Republican Leader, Jim Durkin states that ,”the law is aimed at reducing crime in Chicago” (Smith). He also mentioned that 425 people have been murdered with guns so far in Chicago in 2016. The shocking part is that nearly 60% of those guns used to commit those crimes were purchased out of the city. The sad truth is that no matter how many deaths result from gun violence, nothing will be done. More

As the famous Thomas Jefferson once said, “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm not only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” This quote is saying that removing guns from the innocent people will leave criminals armed, therefore supporting killings, meaning removing guns or making stricter gun laws will cause more deaths. I am against stricter gun laws for many reasons, two of which are people are ignorant and don’t know how hard it already is to purchase guns, and two, because people suppose guns are the matter when the problem is actually people themselves. In these past few years, we have seen school shootings all across the nation. This is due to people that have problems. Take Nikolas

Making and passing strict gun-control laws will not make our nation safer nor more protected by no means. Did you know there was a study published in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy proving that nations that have more guns tend to have less crime? Gun controls laws are too cruel. People should be aloud to obtain guns. Gun-related crime has been depleting in recent years, gun control laws discourage the right to self defense and even the second amendment proves this.

Should gun control laws be changed? Well, first, gun control is entirely based off the notion that people are committing gun related crimes because they have access to them and these debates are whether or not the nation should ban guns entirely. This whole rebel of gun control change is said to help reduce violent crimes (Swickard). This is a well-known debate in today’s world. Many are involved in protests all around the world, while their schools are getting shot up and are asking for changes to make gun control laws stricter. However, the fact is, guns are not the problem in this world, it is the individual. If you put a gun in a criminal’s hand, they could do whatever they wish. Gun control laws should not be changed because current laws

In the United States alone, thirty-nine percent of the citizens have at least one gun stored in their household, under the rights of the Constitution. Not long ago, there was a mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada that caused a state of worry around the nation and made many people to second guess the laws we have currently. Gun violence has been getting out of hand and an outrageous number of people want to change the gun control laws but changing laws about guns won’t stop people from using them and more illegal activity will be going around in our country.

Gun Control has been a main topic lately throughout social media and news networks due to all the mass school shootings and other gun related crimes! People are calling for stricter laws on gun control. In 1981 President Reagan rejected a call for additional gun legislation, saying “there are today 20,000 gun control laws in effect being federal,state,and local in the U.S.”. So what we should be asking for instead of stricter laws on gun control is the laws that are already in place be enforced more diligently. Thus insuring less criminals and mentally ill are able to obtain firearms and commit heinous crimes. Everyday 96 people of all ages die from gunshot wounds either by murder, assault, suicide,or police intervention. With already 20,000

Gun control laws should not be strengthened in an attempt to keep the residents of the United States safe. For many people when the topic of gun control comes up they think about tragic shootings such as Sandy Hook or Columbine where innocent children lost their lives and blame it all on the gun used. This brings me to my first argument that guns are not the root cause of killings. Unfortunately even if all guns were abolished, anyone with an intent to kill will find a new option such as bombs, knives, or fire which has already been done in killings such as the Boston Marathon Bombing. The people doing the killing need fixing and help, not the laws. A study by Harvard showed several European countries with high gun ownership, like Norway, Finland, Germany and France had 9 times lower murder rates than in Luxembourg where handguns are totally banned and ownership of any kind of gun is minimal. This proves guns are not the issue, peoples mindsets are. This explains why Russia enforces very strict gun control on its people, but its murder rate still remains four times higher than in

Gun production is increasing drastically over the years (Horsley). Having this in mind, should there be a gun control law? People have different thoughts about it. Some may say that the guns are not the problem because they are not the ones who kill, but the person’s decision to shoot. Others believe that they are beneficially as for protection. The argument on having gun control is a controversy on protection, the background checks, and gun death statistics.

Will making gun laws harsher reduce the rate of gun violence in America? I have not heard of many “self-defense” cases involving guns throughout my lifetime. I believe that guns have no place in society and that gun laws should be harsher to take them out of the hands of many individuals. I believe that guns should be harder to access, own, and keep. Ways the government should change gun laws should be to make background checks more reliable and in depth, making requirements for owning a gun stricter, changing current gun laws to adapt to new social changes, and improving mental health services. In my essay I plan on stating my opinion on various topics, and back my opinions up with statistics about gun violence. I will take into consideration