The Pros And Cons Of Shared Knowledge

This paper deals with ways history can be interpreted and influences different interpretations have on society and individuals. This is explored through

A person who views history as the actions of individuals is what brought about history believes in personality views, whereas a person how believes the culture and intellectual environment of a particular history era believes in the naturalistic history (Goodwin p. 10)

In Telling the Truth About History, three historians discuss how the expanded skepticism and the position that relativism has reduced our capacity to really know and to expound on the past. The book talks about the written work of history and how individuals are battling with the issues of what is “truth.” It likewise examines the post-modernist development and how future historians

The actions of people arbitrate the inquiry of our past, yet it seems that everyone lives in the present and for the future, not bothering with “what has been”. Historian Peter N. Stearns constructs a valid argument as to why he believes it is critical for human beings to access the “laboratory of human experience”, thus gaining knowledge of the study of history. Stearns holds firm in the notion that history is a unique discipline in itself, differing from more tangible studies, such as math. No longer is history being justified through education to differentiate social statuses, rather to take advantage of the seemingly indispensable benefits of learning about the past. Stearns affirms that history harbors beauty because it is essential to understanding individuals and society, as well as the changes society has undergone over time.

The natural sciences and the arts are two areas of knowledge that play a prominent role in producing knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to procedural (knowing how) or propositional knowledge (knowing that) which is agreed upon and accepted by groups of people; it evolves over time as methods of justification change. For example, the Areas of Knowledge are considered shared knowledge because many people contribute to them. Personal knowledge differs between individuals; it includes personal skills, acquaintances and procedural knowledge that have been acquired through experience. It is much harder to communicate personal knowledge because it is based on personal experiences that differ between individuals (Knowledge in ToK). Although they can

Our lives are divided periodically into three segments of time: the past, present, and the future. These segments are ordered in this particular way because the events from the past lead humanity towards an unpredictable future. The first segment is proclaimed to be a subject of history. History by definition has occurred in the past, comprising individuals or an entire society. To obtain a better understanding of the relationship between these three interconnected periods, it is important to recognize that history is derived from the past. However, in our daily lives we learn new perspectives from our successors who are creating history. That being said, the people who have been known to have influence in history have significance or relevance

Shared knowledge is knowledge that is deemed to be universally accepted and thus has the reliability to be shared in means such as disciplines taught in school whereas Personal knowledge is often built through ones feelings, emotions, perspectives and opinions, as well as how an individual would interpret the world around them, through their senses, and often is not shared, due to its subjectivity and lack of reliability following suit.

Sustainability is a term utilized by environmentalists, historians, biologists, and everyone in between to describe the capacity to endure (Sustainability). Most commonly, the action of being sustainable is thought of in terms of interactions with the environment to satisfy anthropogenic desires. Humankind’s insatiable consumption habits have made sustainability a word incorporated into vocabularies across the globe. The conversation of what it means to be sustainable occurs at the dinner table in a small, agricultural village, down the platitudinous isles of rice and beans at the grocery store, during merger meetings among Fortune 500 companies, and even in assemblages between the United Nations.

Perspectives can be evolved and altered as the time is progressing. As a Chinese old saying states, “the spectators see the chess game better than the players”, many who live in the moment are unable to objectively justify the contemporary events happened around them. Only the descendants, analyzing from new perspective, can draw a conclusion more comprehensively while learning the history. Historians from different eras hold diverse perspectives, leading to various interpretations of a certain topic: “To what extent did Hitler’s foreign

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained

Different types of knowledge influence us in different ways. The way in which knowledge affects an individual depends on the community of shared knowledge they belong to. Shared knowledge is the product of more than one individual, and further shared amongst all individuals in a given group. It is stated as something “We know.” Shared knowledge is objective and not static, as over time, it evolves due to new advancements in the method of enquiry. For example, in my IB Biology course, the subject matter in each learning outcome is the product of a large number of individuals working together. The knowledge is shared amongst my colleagues and I, and other individuals in the Biology community. The IB Biology course is changing in the near future due to new discoveries in the methods of inquiry that were accepted by the Biology community. Shared knowledge becomes

The basic definition of knowledge, as I see it, is “it can be personal or shared truths which can be justified by areas of knowing, and constructed by ways of knowing”, which is the information, understanding, a skill that we may get from experience and/or education. The application and the removal of personal knowledge influences shared knowledge, making it so that the value of itself is defined by its application and even by the lack of it. Leading to the knowledge question “To what extent is shared knowledge more valuable to the world than personal knowledge?”. How can one define ‘Value’ and is it fair to say that if knowledge is not shared, it is not applied in the world? Valuable to whom? To what? How do we measure value? Who judges value?

Personal knowledge and shared knowledge are two extremely different ways in which people obtain knowledge. Shared knowledge is defined as ‘a socio-cultural knowledge, broadly along the lines of a set of norms, values, signifiers and cultural mores’ and ‘personal knowledge comes from the local experience of an individual’ . From my own perspective I believe shared knowledge is obtained through collaborative work; knowing from others, and personal knowledge is obtained from a person’s own opinion; what I know. The role the two forms of knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge, play in human sciences and mathematics exemplifies their importance in a person’s understanding of the world.

To address this question we must distinguish between shared knowledge and personal knowledge. Shared knowledge is information that is known by most people in regards to a community. This might include facts or interpretations that are common among a community. For example utilitarianism in ethics is the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Personal knowledge is the knowledge acquired from the experiences of a certain individual. I would say that shared knowledge shapes personal knowledge. This is mainly because from the day we are born we are influenced by many factors that define our character, such as culture, parents, education or religion. Over the course of history we have seen leaders that transformed vast populations with

Our conclusions on any occasion are direct consequences of any developed concept in our minds. We see the world as we want to see it through our personal perceptions. When we are categorizing anything as desirable or otherwise, we judge using the concepts that we hold to us. Although different concepts may shape different conclusions, they are all influenced by beliefs and experiences. So, to what extent do our beliefs modify the conclusions that we may reach? The knowledge obtained through out someone’s life through their experiences, or belief system direct decision making almost completely. In my essay I will explore how Ethics and Human sciences correlate with this topic. I will also implement and tie in the connections of Reason and link these concepts with belief and experiences.