preview

The Pros And Cons Of The Financial Crisis

Decent Essays

After the Great Depression, the financial industry was strictly controled and the United States didn’t have any financial crisis for 40 years of economic development. Most banks of U.S. were worked locally and all were baned to use the depositors’ saving for speculating. In addition, the investment banks which held bond and stock, were strictly regulated in small or private partnerships. The change was started in 1982 when the U.S. President Ronald Reagan allowed the banks take the depositors’ money to provide for risky investments. Therefore, in late of 1980s, a lot of savings and loan companies had gone to bankrupt and this crisis expensed taxpayers 124 billion dollars, and many people lost their savings as a result. After that, under Clinton …show more content…

The merge would approve Citicorp to access to the investors and insurance buyers while the insurance company – Travelers could market mutual funds and insurance to bank’s customers. But this merger is illegally due to the Glass – Steagall Act which was published after the Great Depression. The Glass – Steagall Act prevent the commercial banks, investment banks and insurance services cooperate with others under one roof. United State government were published two separate acts which were the responses to get out of the Stock Market Crash pressure in 1929. The first one was the Glass – Steagall Act which approved in February 27, 1932, gave the Federal Reserve more control of the money supply and United State got out of the gold standard. It lasted only a year until 1933 when the Banking Act amended provisions designing safer banking and making it less prone to assumption. The act had two primary provisions which were commercial banks and securities firm’s activities were independent with one another, consolidating the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and presenting the Regulation Q which put a ceiling on the savings deposits interest rate while rejecting paying interest on commercial demand deposits. Federal Reserve did not do anything in this illegal combination. After a year, …show more content…

The government are probable to intervene banks which are called TBTF, it can figure out the problem immediately but the long term systemic risk will be increased. The reason is when banks are called TBTF the investors and creditors have less reason to analyze banks, and the banks’ managements have more effort to take risks. Governments tried to mitigate this element of moral hazard by being consciously unclear about which banks they would save from danger and on what terms, but the recent rescues obliterated this uncertainly, and everyone now believes that any large financial institution—bank or nonbank—will not be allowed to fail in the way nonfinancial companies

Get Access