On September 30, 2015, the end of the previous fiscal year, the national debt of the United States was $18.15 trillion, while GPD was only $17.95 trillion, according to the U.S Department of the Treasury and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). With a national debt larger than GDP, and a deficit greater than GDP growth, the topic has reemerged in political discussion. Two main schools of thought seem to exist on the topic: one side argues that the large size and rate of growth poses an immediate effect to the economic well-being of the country, while the other side stand by the idea that while the deficit needs to be managed, the amount of debt remains a reasonable sum. One supporter of the first viewpoint, Dr. J.D. Foster, deputy chief economics …show more content…
Chamber of Commerce, believes immediate changes need to be made in order to counteract the growth of the national debt. On the opposite side, economists for the International Monetary Fund, including Jonathan Ostry, Atish R. Ghosh, and Raphael Espinoza, the authors of “When Should Public Debt Be Reduced?” provide evidence that the existence of large debt does not necessarily mean a problems exists. While both viewpoints hold merit, the dangers portrayed of the United States national debt by Foster and the arguments he uses set a dangerous background on which to make economic decisions. Foster focuses on a number of ideas in his article, “The Many Real Dangers of Soaring National Debt” which create a viewpoint that the reduction of the national debt should be an important goal to consider when designing fiscal policy. A major idea involves the role that interest rates play. Foster argues that while the United States currently benefits from low borrowing rates,
The growing national deficit is a looming problem in the United States now more than ever. The national debt is constantly increasing and government spending is out of control. If these issues are not solved then they could spell disaster for the nation’s economy when the infamous debt ceiling is finally reached. Currently the national policy on the debt is to continue raising the debt limit until a solution is found that is agreeable between both parties in Congress. The two main issues of over spending and the constant raising of the debts ceiling by Congress can both be resolved by government spending reform, balancing the federal budget and initiating pro-growth policies in order to increase the government’s tax revenue.
In the book Hamilton’s Blessing, Gordon uses economic history and theory to explore the start, rise and decline of the United States debt. Gordon opens his book by stating that this country was born in debt, and this debt has become so high that concerned individuals no longer think of it. Throughout the book, he traces the history of the national debt dating back from 1791, when the central bank of the United States was created, up to modern days. The intellectual architect of this creation was Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary as well as a central figure who had a deep impact on the economic development of the United States. The title of the book clearly recalls Hamilton's statement that a national debt, "if not excessive,
The recent clash between the president and congress about raising the debt ceiling made the front page on every newspaper throughout the country and generated controversy of unimaginable proportion among the citizens of the United States of America (College for Financial Planning). No macroeconomics issue is more controversial today than the impact of large public debt on the economy and on future generations, but, however, there appears to be a huge disconnect between professional, political leaders, and the ordinary public about the national debt and its impact on the current and future
Many United States' citizens are unaware of the country's current financial state. Many assume that one of the world's wealthiest countries could never be in debt. This is untrue however, and, in fact, the country with the greatest income per capita is in major debt. This study will examine possible solutions to reducing the United States' national budget deficit.
“Ten Trillion and Counting,” presented by Frontline provides quite a picture of America’s national debt as it surpasses the trillion dollar mark. They ponder the financial well being of current and future retirees while also exposing on how America got into this mess, and what the Obama administration plans to do during his term. America is able to close the gap year to year in its national budget by selling bonds and T-bills. Foreigner countries who continually purchase these obligations are beginning to grow. Much like the Bush administration, the Obama administration has started borrowing big with plans to cut the budget years down the road. It is clear for anyone to see that this borrowing and the future promises of cutting cannot go
Many Americans today are aware that the United States is in debt, however, some may not realize by how much. Currently, the United States National Debt is up to 18 trillion dollars and is steadily increasing. This is a serious problem for the U.S., especially for millennials, who are going to be the ones living and dealing with the debt left behind for them. Increased spending, borrowing from China, and interest on the money borrowed are setting up our economy for an eventual crash, one that the upcoming generation may not be prepared for. Every dollar that accumulates into the debt will have to be repaid with interest at some point, making it harder to pay back. To gain a better understanding of how the U.S. dug itself into such a deep hole, one should start at the beginning of where the debt started.
The United States national debt is large. The U.S. Debt-to-GDP ratio has grown to over 60 percent in recent years. We are more than $15 trillion in debt. In this paper I will address the federal budget, the United States debt, and the resulting impacts on society in several sectors.
We hear about the debt almost every day: news talks about it, politicians argue about it, even President Obama gives speeches on it. So what is the significance behind it? In this article I am going to explain briefly what the national debt is, how big it is, and what it has to do with us.
The United States has adopted a persona of uncontrollable spending policies, and short term solutions. As the spending trajectory continues in a downward spiral, fueled by unsustainable policies, and current tax revenues, the national debt continues to grow. For many years, the United States has implemented policies that failed to address mandatory spending costs, which, unfortunately continue to outpace the national economy. Furthermore, Congress has created a habit of introducing short term solutions in order to confront a long term issue of national debt. Although, there are many driving forces behind the U.S. fiscal problem, mandatory spending
With the United Stated national debt being over $19 trillion dollars, many Americans are worried about the country’s long-term debt problems. In order to make this national deficit, the government needs to operate with a budget plan. For the past 10 years, the federal government’s budget has continually operated as a loss. As the money continues to grow over time, the United States goes deeper and deeper into debt. Our current way of trying to grow our economy out of debt is not working.
The National Debt consists of the total debt accrued by local, state and federal. Public debt is essentially the federal debt, thus compiling the staggering number that already exists. The debt deficit to me is astonishing. Currently, the total public debt in the United States, as of December 16, 2015, is $18,788,138,221,346.49. This includes $13,600,726,418,253.26 debt held by the public and $5,187,411,803,093.23 by intergovernmental holdings (usgovermentdebt, 2015). High GPD is not anything new to the United States. The all-time high was 121.70 percent ($18827323.00) in 1946 and a record low of 31.70 ($253400.00) percent in 1974 (United States Government Debt to GDP, 2015). The way we are spending, and the debt we are accruing, it would
This paper will attempt to answer the question: Is the federal deficit and government deficits in general a good or a bad thing? While it may be easy to lose sight of how the government chooses to handle its money, it is also important for citizens to be conscious of how their money is being spent, and whether or not the current course that the government is plotted on is either sustainable or the best allocation of resources.
Thesis: Broadly speaking, the debt crisis facing the US and the international community is an issue that has far reaching implications not only for financial institutions but also to many working people and many economists are giving top priority in solving this issue.
Throughout most of the country’s history, the United States’ federal government maintained a reasonable level of national debt. For example, the total national debt in 1981 was $998 billion. Since then, however, the government has generated significant budget deficits, and the level of debt has risen to $16.7 trillion in 2013 (Calleo, 39). Budget deficits are caused
America's fiscal policy is regarded as unsustainable because borrowing has both explicit and implicit costs associated with it. The explicit costs are the interest payments we make on the national debt. According to The Moment of Truth: Report of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, we will pay $226 billion in net interest and projects that to rise to $938 billion by 2020. Also, if you add the interest payments over the next ten years, it amounts to a staggering $5.76 trillion dollars (2010). That is more than one-third of the present-day GDP and threatens to keep getting larger. This brings us to the implicit costs. The $5.76 trillion we are projected to spend on debt interest is empty spending. It does not provide anything to the nation's future and forces us to forgo spending it in ways that would have resulted in a positive return, such as: education, energy and technology. To make matters worse, more than 50% of our debt is not owned by Americans but by foreign lenders (Murphy, 2010). In other words, less than half of the interest payments go to American lenders who are likely to spend it domestically and strengthen the economy, another implicit cost.