The rapid growth of managed care is the response to limited financial resources and the demand for healthcare services to be affordable. Economic viability is a crucial aspect of health care. Managed care plans were developed to provided health care services, but also to be a method to collect payment for services. There are different types of managed care plans. For example, health maintenance organization (HMO), preferred provider organization (PPO), and point-of-service (POS) plans. For brevity of this paper the HMO managed care system will be discussed along with the relevance of the role of the advance practitioner practicing in HMO setting.
The 1970's need for primary care settings to curtail and control cost for employee
…show more content…
Another advantage is HMOs have an authorized formulary that covered the cost of prescription medications. The down-side if a care provider prescribed a medication that is not authorized then the expense is placed back on to the consumer unless prior approval is obtained. There are times when a particular medication or specialist is required and will involve the prescribing person to contact the HMO for preapproval. Another disadvantage after seeking preapproval the claim may be denied, but the consumer does have the option to appeal the decision. This does create a problem when there are time constraints; which is another disadvantage.
What is happening to the premiums? Today's economic times have forced HMOs to increase premium rates. In the last few years there has been a substantial increase in premiums. In 1997, an article printed in Business Week reported although a growing number of consumers are enrolled in a HMO the higher prices of medical cost has forced HMOs to lay off employees and forced the sell off of some HMOs. This style of managed care had turned into a commodity business which is no longer profitable. What did this mean? It meant that HMO are now stuck competing on prices and battling for market shares.
Consumers were demanding healthcare change because of the rising cost of premiums. In the markets, rival insurers started to offer nearly identical plans,
While our understanding has evolved with respect to certain advantages of MCO’s, our understanding of the disadvantages has also grown. This analysis will evaluate the use of MCO’s as a gatekeeper to controlling health care cost and offerings. It will evaluate the advantage MCO’s provide in a rapidly growing market due to the aging of baby boomers. The analysis will evaluate disadvantages that can arise with relying on MCO’s. These disadvantages work against the insurance company forcing a polarizing balance between how much control the MCO should retain over recommendation and provision of services.
An HMO is an organization whereby the subscriber, or patient, is allowed to choose a medical provider from a list of doctors within a certain medical group. Each physician
The health care system in the United States has been growing and changing for years and will continue to do so for years to come. The one constant in the Unite States health care system is change and evolution through evaluations of those changes. If there had not been unrest with the level and provisions of care in the early 1970s Managed Care may have never been introduced. President Nixon signed legislation in 1973 termed, Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Act of 1973. This pivotal event in the health care system allowed for a change from the fee for service model to a comprehensive range of medical or health
rising health care costs. Managed care can be defined a system of delivering health services in
In an attempt to understand the impact of managed care in the U.S, I look at the most commonly expressed complaints against the organization. In a survey of consumers, 60% said that managed care had not made a difference in health care cost or had actually been the cause of the increase of health care cost. Managed care has had an impact on slowing the rates of growth in the costs of two major health care producers: hospitals and physicians. Little evidence has suggested that the current reimbursement are inadequate to the care provided. The quality of care is a highly debated issue. Physicians are concerned that the quality of care in managed care organizations may reflect the loss of professional autonomy through pre-authorization procedures.
insurance gave the insured open access to any provider. This led to an over use of services. Most
HMOs multiplied rapidly with the new federal giveaways. Managed care, now including PPOs, mushroomed. Employers initially perceived managed care plans as cheaper than traditional fee-for-service insurance. Gradually, they stopped offering a choice of health plans, making individual policies more expensive. HMOs' penetration of the industry had been subsidized into existence. Government had instituted managed care. Today, while overall quality of patient care remains the best in the world, doctors practice medicine in an increasingly intricate web of rationing and regulations: Physicians are stripped of professional autonomy. As patients wander the maze of managed bureaucracy, costs rise and quality deteriorates. Every American dependent on a third party for health coverage is a potential victim of managed care. And state sponsored management of medicine
To decide on whether or not an issue is considered ethical or moral we need the hard cold facts. Facts expose or explain what is to be decided upon—not what the outcome should be. Decisions regarding health care and mental health issues represent a major portion of ethical and moral choices. As individuals we are not always able to understand the justice, or fairness, behind the decisions supposedly based on hard cold facts.
Health maintenance organization’s (HMOs) use of the primary care physician (PCP) as the “gatekeeper” initially had MCOs view restrictions as a negative approach to patients’ choices. However, some necessary steps have started to be implemented which reduce unnecessary utilization by enforcing some restrictions.
The impact this rise is going to have on heath care as well as heath insurance is very dramatic. Most health insurers, private sector employers and consumers can expect increases in insurance premiums. This includes both traditional types of insurance and managed care programs, or HMOs. Some health insurance plans may also reduce benefits to keep their plans affordable. This may include increasing cost-sharing responsibility of members and the amount members pay out of pocket for certain services, such as prescription drugs.
The types of managed care are differentiated by definition, operation, structure, and information needs. `HMOs were the most common type of MCO until commercial insurance companies developed PPOs to compete with HMOs' (Douglas, 2003, p.331). `HMOs are business entities that either arrange for or provide health services to an enrolled population after prepayment of a fixed sum of money, called a premium' (Peden, 1998, p.78). There are three characteristics that an HMO must have. The first is a health care financing and delivery system that provides services for members in a particular geographic area. Second, is ensured access to a complete range of health care services, health maintenance, treatment, and routine checkups. Last, health care must be obtained from voluntary personnel that participate in the HMO. The five HMO models related to the participating physicians are the Staff
It is “designed to screen out unnecessary and inappropriate care and to reduce costs (Gerdes et al., 2013). Different forms of managed care exist and we still use them to this day, including the health maintenance organization (HMO) and the preferred provider organization (PPO). The HMO structure requires a person to have a primary care physician and the individual can only go to a specialist after getting referred by this physician (Gerdes et al., 2013). The PPO structure offers clients a list of health care providers to choose from that are in their preferred network. If the individual decides to go out of network, the cost is either reimbursed at a lower rate or not covered at all (Gerdes et al., 2013). Managed care changed the health care system drastically, which lead to a “fundamental shift in the role of the social workers in acute health care” (NASW, date?). More emphasis was placed on discharge planning and transitioning the person to a different level of care or home (NASW, date?).
Throughout the last half of the 20th century, employers have acted on their own to regulate health costs by requiring employees to join health maintenance organizations (HMOs). More than 100 million Americans are under managed care. However, many patients and doctors complain that HMOs impose too many regulations and sacrifice healthcare quality. HMOs are undergoing a high level of scrutiny due to criticisms that the network is controlling and jeopardizing the healthcare system of the nation.
Some of the pros for managed care are; Preventive care — HMOs pay for programs, they are set up and are intended at keeping one healthy (yearly checkups, gym memberships, etc.)The idea is, so they won 't have to pay for more costly services when and if one gets sick. Lower premiums — Because there are limits set as to which doctors one can see and when one can see them, HMOs charge a premium and usually they are lower premiums. Prescriptions — As part of their precautionary retreat, most prescriptions are covered by HMOs for a co-payment that also can be very low. Fewer unnecessary procedures —doctors are given financial incentives from HMOs , to provide only needed care, so doctors are less likely to
The Iron triangle for healthcare consists of cost, quality, and access; these three characteristics when balanced create great healthcare. Managed Care Organizations combine the three to offer consumers with care that is appropriate for their individual needs. Our book describes managed care organizations as “the cost management of healthcare services by controlling who the consumer sees and how much the service cost” (Basics of the U.S Healthcare System, Niles). Taking a look at the history prior to the Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 (HMO ACT of 1973) the implementation has been significant in balancing cost, and quality control. Before this Act was signed in to law by President Nixon healthcare costs were determined by fee for service. A fee for service or indemnity plan is a plan that allows the provider to determine the cost of service, this fee for service plan caused for healthcare costs to increase rapidly. An example of this would be going to the doctor with neck pain, being told to stretch then receiving a bill for 25,000 dollars. As could be understood the cost of healthcare had became a problem.