Naturalism, Determinism, and the Bible
In The Red Badge of Courage, by Stephen Crane, Henry has just finished an important battle. Henry, as he flees, trips over a friend who died, and notices that despite all the carnage and death around him, the birds are still singing, squirrels play around his friend’s body, and nature continues to carry on as it always has. He wonders what kind of nature this is, that is so unfeeling towards men and death. This worldview expressed by Crane is called naturalism. Naturalism claims that man is ruled by forces he is unable to affect, such as nature, his social environment, or deterministic scientific laws, and to naturalists, God does not exist, or is cold and indifferent to the human race; the Bible clearly contradicts this worldview, confirming that man has free choice over his actions, and that God actively loves and cares for the people
…show more content…
Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions.” (Google search) This definition effectively sums up determinism, an idea which is intertwined with naturalism so closely that the two are often lumped together. There is an important difference, however. Naturalism is focused on control, malevolent and unfeeling nature, social environments, and science, while determinism is more about the lack of responsibility men carry for their actions. Stephen Crane gives an important instance of determinism in action in his book The Red Badge of Courage when Henry, the main character of the novel, deserts in the middle of a Civil War battle. Rather than condemning his character, Crane implies through his character’s thoughts and actions that Henry couldn’t help running away, that the fear had simply overcome him and that made his actions acceptable, or even
Determinism is the idea that everything we do as humans is determined by events prior to us being born and events that have happened in the past. Decisions that you may think are based on your desires, are actually based of things beyond your control. But the big question is, if determinism is
There are those who think that our behavior is a result of free choice, but there are also others who believe we are servants of cosmic destiny, and that behavior is nothing but a reflex of heredity and environment. The position of determinism is that every event is the necessary outcome of a cause or set of causes, and everything is a consequence of external forces, and such forces produce all that happens. Therefore, according to this statement, man is not free.
The debate between free will and determinism is something that will always be relevant, for people will never fully admit that we have no free will. But, while we may feel that we control what we do in life, we simply do not. The argument for free will is that individuals have full control and responsibility over their actions, and what they become in life as a whole (The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility by Galen Strawson, page 16). Determinism, on the other hand, is saying that we have no control over our actions and that everything we do in life is determined by things beyond our control (Strawson, page 7). After analysis of The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility by Galen Strawson and Freedom and Necessity by A. J. Ayer,
Crane defines courage as "a temporary but sublime absence of selflessness," I think Henry experienced a temporary but not sublime absence of consciousness. In battle I think he was acting more like a machine than himself. "Henry ran like a madman to reach the woods before a bullet could discover him...In his haste his eyes almost closed, and the scene was a wild blur...pulsating saliva stood at the corners of his mouth."(Crane Ch. 20) He was acting out of fear, thus he wasn't truly himself in his actions. The one main reason Henry fled in the beginning is because he feared death. When you act out of fear you become more mechanical in your actions. A hero doesn't flee from battle and try to rationalize their actions by lying to
Naturalism is used by Steven Crane throughout his works to express the indifference nature has within ones environment. Typically, the stories that surround this naturalistic theme have characters that find themselves in dire situations and are left to deal with the indifference of nature, the struggle of courage and cowardice, and the psychological stress that they endure. Crane brings to light throughout several of his stories the theme that although nature is indifferent and may leave us with a loss of control, it is crucial that one does not allow their psyche to succumb to the fear of mortality, but to manage that fear, since Crane suggests we cannot eliminate it completely. Crane suggests that one can find meaning and eventually self-realization
Determinism is based off this notion that all events are pre-determined, without influence by human actions. If this is true, we can imply that people do not have free will and thus are not responsible for their actions. In Oedipus the King we see that the dichotomy of fate and free will is hazed by the hyperbole of events, which can make it difficult, but possible, to determine if humans even have free will. Through Oedipus’s flaws and decisions and Sophocles use of the imagery of a crossroad it is apparent that free will can be exercised in a meaningful way.
Determinism (as defined by Webster) is “A doctrine that acts of the will, natural events, or social changes are determined by preceding events or natural causes”. Likely, the most radical definition of determinism would state that all events in the world are the result of a previous event, or a combination of previous events. Within the realm of the all encompassing radical determinism there are philosophies that are somewhat better thought out or backed by science. One example of this is Genetic Determinism. We know that people are in some way determined by their genes both physically and behaviorally, as the human DNA is applied. Two categories of genetic determinism are Genetic Fixity and Innate Capacity.
“Roy, will you be the best there ever was in the game?” “That’s right.” (p.33) In The Natural, by Bernard Malamud, Roy Hobbs intends to be the best baseball player there ever was, breaking all of the records and enjoying the fame that came with it. He started playing for the Knights under the management of Pop Fisher as a rookie at the age of 34. His career started slowly but eventually he became the most liked and most watched player in all of baseball leading his team from last place in the standings to the best team in baseball. In 1984, Mark Johnson took the book and produced it into a movie. While there were plenty of small differences, a few major changes were made. These changes ultimately led us from the book where we didn’t like
I thought that Baron d’Holbach summarized the determinists viewpoint when he said, “Man’s life is a line that nature commands him to describe upon the surface of the earth, without ever being able to swerve from it, even for an instant. He is born without his own consent; his organization does in nowise depend upon himself; his ideas come to him involuntarily; his habits are in the power of who cause him to contract them; he is unceasingly modified by causes, whether visible or concealed, over which he has no control, which necessarily regulate his mode of existence, give the hue to his way of thinking, and determine his manner of acting” (Chaffee, 2013, p. 178).
Crane immediately sets a tone of disapproval and insubordination from Henry’s mother when he writes “But his mother had discouraged him. She had affected to look with some contempt upon the quality of his war ardor and patriotism. She could calmly seat herself and with no apparent difficulty give him many hundreds of reasons why he was of vastly more importance on the farm than on the field of battle”. He displays Henry’s courage through this as he defies what his own mother is advising him to do and continues on his dream to serve for the Union army. Crane also exhibited Henry’s bravery when he states that Henry felt like “prey” to his fellow soldiers because he was a “fresh fish”. Even though Henry didn’t feel accepted among the ranks of the men fighting beside him, he continued to stay and fight for what he believed in.
Additionally, nature will continue to thrive and prosper even at hard times for man. This is shown in a quote from RBOC chapter ** which states “ “. This quote is the pure demonstration of how nature doesn’t care. While Henry freaks out about running away from battle and about the dead man getting up and chasing him there’s ants crawl on the man's dead body. The ants crawling on the man’s body is the demonstration of how nature will not care about man or mankind's deeds.
Throughout the novel Henry speculates whether or not he will run from battle. In this scene Henry finally makes a decision without hesitation. Why Stephen Crane compares Henry to a rabbit, defines how Henry made this important decision. Earlier on in the battle Henry had seen a rabbit running away for where the battle was. This makes him question if he was making the right decision because it seemed that even a simple rabbit knew when to run from danger and he did not. Henry’s choice is important for the continuation of the book, because it defines how he thinks during the rest of the novel and defines how Henry is defined as a character. Even though in Henry’s future he might achieve some sort of heroic action, but the reader will always know
Before one can properly evaluate the entire debate that enshrouds the Free Will/Determinism, each term must have a meaning, but before we explore the meaning of each term, we must give a general definition. Determinism is, "Everything that happens is caused to happen. (Clifford Williams. "Free Will and Determinism: A Dialogue" pg 3). This is the position that Daniel, a character in Williams’ dialogue, chooses to believe and defend. David Hume goes a little deeper and explains in his essay, "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding of Liberty and Necessity," that determinism is this: "It is universally allowed, that matter, in all its operations, is actuated by a necessary force, and
Against the naturalism’s view of man is that “Human beings are complex machines; personality is an interrelation of chemical and physical properties we do not yet fully understand” (Colorado Christian University, 2014). In the Bible, God revealed himself as the creator of earth and created He man in His own image. God is the creator of heaven and earth and all that dwells in it, including human, animals, nonliving
Naturalism claims that man is ruled by forces he is unable to affect, such as nature, his social environment, or deterministic scientific laws, and to naturalists, God does not exist, or is cold and indifferent to the human race; the Bible clearly contradicts this worldview, confirming that man has free choice over his actions, and that God actively loves and cares for the people that He has created.