preview

The Silent Holocaust : The Silent Holocaust

Decent Essays

War and genocide: two tragic and devastating events that people often think of as vastly different. Where war usually reveals political difference, genocide demonstrates the idea of a certain party that desires to use mass destruction on another group. However, war and genocide have similarities which create uncertainty on how to define the event. “The Silent Holocaust”, more specifically known as the Guatemalan genocide of the Mayans, is a model example of confusion between war and genocide; many Mayans were killed, but the government claims the killings were justified. The Mayans’ fight for equality led the Guatemalan government to commit genocide against these people, by using the factors of the ongoing war as an excuse for the Mayan …show more content…

The government’s masking of the truth eluded the severity of the Guatemalan conflict, which delayed humanitarian aid from the problem. Justifications for the war were made when the government stated it was ongoing, which somewhat covered the traces of these massacres. Although the war started in 1960 and ended in 1996 , the “violence faced by the Mayan people peaked between 1978 and 1986” (Genocide). Since the war and genocide at one point occurred simultaneously, people were confused by the situation in Guatemala. Out of the approximately 200,000 people killed in this war, over 166,000 of them were Mayan (SILENT). The massive proportion of victims that were Mayan revealed the government’s purpose to wipe out the one group that may have threatened the government’s power. According to the United Nations, “genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. This definition is a parallel to the acts done by the Guatemalan military. The struggle for foreign countries to determine Guatemala’s situation between war and genocide helped the Guatemalan military to continue mass killing Mayans. Former dictator Rios Montt claimed that there was “no genocide, but a high cost during a bloody civil war” which many perceived to be true (Castillo). Since Montt was in a position of power, his words carried more

Get Access