The French Revolution was a chaotic time of blood, death, and fear. Though there were many negative outcomes and events of the Revolution, it big change to sweep across France. The Revolution began in the middle of 1789 with the swearing of the Tennis Court Oath, in which members of the third estate, as well as some from the first and second estates, swore that they would not go anywhere until they had written a constitution for France. Then, the Revolution really took off, and continued on for years. Many people influenced the Revolution, such as Marat and Robespierre. The death of Marat was another event that had a large influence on the Revolution, as though he had caused lots of deaths, he was stilled viewed as a hero by most. Looking at the two paintings “The Tennis Court Oath,” and “The Death of Marat,” “The Tennis Court Oath” depicts a more significant and relevant event, as this was the event to really cause the French Revolution to take off.
“The Tennis Court Oath” is a painting that depicts the swearing of an oath by members mainly from the third estate, but also some from the first and second that had sided with the third. Just days before, the estates had been called by the king to a meeting of the Estates General, where the representatives from each estate gathered at the palace Versailles to discuss important matters proposed by the king. The Estates General had not met in over 150 years, but the king needed their approval for him to raise taxes to
Between 1789 and 1814 the French Revolution astonished and impacted the world. The Revolution has been talked about for years because of its contributions and the way it affected the world. The significant figures from the Revolution also played important roles in history and in areas outside of France. King Louis’ absolutism and the unfair treatment between classes were political, social, and economical causes of the French Revolution. This Revolution impacted the people of France by terrorizing and affecting their rights, yet at the same time the French Revolution served as a template for other countries when it came to radical changes and Revolutions.
The violent scene that showed the initial outburst of the revolution was the Storming of the Bastille. This depiction of the real life event expertly displays the
The Tennis Court Oath was created purely to balance society once again and lift some of the weight of the taxes off the population. The beginning events of the French Revolution were wholly due to the taxation of the third estate. The American revolution was caused by taxation that was perceived as unconstitutional, while the French revolution was caused by the over taxation of the third estate and the lack of taxation in the first two estates. In both situations taxation angered the general people, moving them to act in order to make a statement to their governing bodies so that they would understand the need for change.
The French revolution which is also referred to as the Revolution of 1789 was a period characterized by both social and political upheaval that span close to a decade in France. It was during this period that the country’s political landscape was redesigned and it involved
In addition to this, the first actual act of revolution against the King was the Tennis Court Oath of 1789 which was prompted by Joseph Sieyes. As the Third Estate often spread the enlightenment values of the rule of government by the people many began to catch on and agree. The Tennis Court Oath was where many finally stood up to the Monarchy and demanded that the Absolute Monarchy be put down. At this point, the Revolution began to take full force and was beginning to become truly radical.
The French Revolution, I my opinion can be summed up in really two words a “human bloodbath”. It begins with King Louis the 16th not noticing the problems of his people. Backing the American Revolution caused France to go into debt that they could not get out of. Therefore, by not making the proper reforms to solve the issues of the King’s subjects. Accordingly, one of the issues that were facing King Louis and his subordinates were two years of bad crops in 1787-1788. Further causing higher food prices, one-third of the population is poor, starvation and death for many of his people. Additionally, the essential staple of the French’s daily food source is bread. The French had further issues to contend with as the years passed.
As I was managing my tiny clothes shop in the run-down village, I could overhear the other merchants conversing over the recent news that’s been dispersing. They spoke of the National Assembly and that it has established “The Tennis Court Oath.” I’m overjoyed that the third estate is forming a constitution that will limit our hoggish king’s power over the third estate. The intolerable taxes that Louis XVI is charging us with is becoming a bigger and bigger burden for my family. My deceased husband’s miniature clothing shop is the only thing that’s providing enough assignats to afford food alone for my two children, Elliott and Joceline. It is crooked
The Tennis Court Oath was a way to finally get equal rights. This meeting was held by the commoners to write a new constitution. We wanted a constitution for the French to get equal say in the government. The meeting voted by head, not by order. At the Tennis Court Oath, the Third Estate took a pledge to force a new constitution on the King. The Third Estate, which had the most representatives, declared itself the Nation Assembly. I was proud to be a part of it. We created the Constitution of 1791, which declared equal rights for the Third Estate. This constitution let voting be by head, and not by order, so that the commoners would have equal rights with the Clergy and Nobility. This event lead to the rise in Democracy because the
Through my initial investigation I discovered a painting of the Tennis Court Oath, by Jacques Louis David, and a book, The Age of Revolution, written by Eric Hobsbawm. The Tennis Court Oath depicts the pledge of the Third Estate to write their own constitution against the Estates General, and the book contains a small analysis of the French Revolution. The Age of Revolution analyses the more radical parts of the French Revolution, with some insight into the Jacobin objectives.
The French Revolution (1789-1814) was a period that affected the outcome of world history tremendously. This is considered a major turning point in European history which has led to dramatic changes in France and other regions of the world. Various social and political issues led to the start of the revolution. Politically, France suffered under the rule of Louis XVI, who ruled by absolute monarchy. Many people had their natural rights renounced and weren’t able to have a political voice. Socially, France had divided its population within 3 estates (classes). French citizens took it upon themselves to remodel their country 's’ political structure. The French Revolution had encountered both positive and negative effects. However, many Europeans viewed the Revolution as much more than just a bloody massacre. The French Revolution was used to demonstrate new ideology that would emphasize the principles of liberty and equality throughout Europe.
Jean-Paul Marat was an important figure in the French revolution because of his tactful writing style, his callings for more violence, and the legacy he left in the French revolution.
Neoclassical Jacques-Louis David’s The Death of Marat, was created on the Age of Revolution, it mirrored the social elite, and intellects, along with the political changes on the scene. The revolutionary movements in France and America, based on classical ideals such as democracy in other countries, made neoclassical art appealing (Annenberg (n.d.). Those ideas were a major factor of the overthrow of the French monarchy in 1789. In the domain of the Revolution, this piece stands today as a moving certification to what can be refined when an Artist's political emotions are clear in his work. A political Martyr
“The revolution which has been effected in France is of so wonderful a nature that the mind can hardly recognize the fact” (Washington, 1789). This moment in history was a tremendous feat for the French citizen who believe in equality and not an individual that are power hungry and selfish. Rebelling against the royals and nobles was high level of thinking because the commoners were distraught about the outcome. As can be seen, in a medieval society, people worried about the outcome, which is why religion was a big part during that era, but there had to have been some revelation that this is not right. That is what the Tennis Court Oath was comprised of, commoners who believe that the nobility is taking the high road and letting the commoners
The French Revolution began as an expression of rebellion against centuries of absolute rule in France. After an interim of experimental liberalism under the rule of Jacobins and Girondins and then the infamous reign of terror, the people of French were drawn to a man who promised them a return to stability, and honor through the expansion of empire. France and it’s people had long yearned for this sens eof honour, it had seemed, and could finally sens eit in a lasting rpesence under the rule of their prodigious, unbeatable general, Napoleon Bonaparte. He would soon take the reigns of civil government as well and become yet another Absolutist ruler, yet this
The French Revolution one of the most important significant events in European history, which lead to the end of European monarchy. The French Revolution effected the way Europeans used to think giving of the sense of hope and liberty from monarch’s or nobles. Thanks to the theories of radical journalists and politicians whom started to publish their thoughts about the French monarchy government, and the leaders of the corrupted government people started to speak more freely about the aristocrat class. One Jean-Paul Marat had been one of those journalists who would speak and write his thoughts about the French monarchy he played a very important role in the making of the French Revolution. However, the amount trouble one gets to speak freely two hundred years ago differs from the modern-day freedom of speech one gets; and Marat’s radicalism against the French monarchy head resulted in his death. As a result, Marta’s death grams the attention of two artists that try to capture the moment of Marat’s death by drawing a portrait of his death. The first artist to draw a portrait of Marat’s death was a French artist Jacques-Louis David in 1793 who named the painting The Death of Marat. Another artist that painted a painting capturing Marat’s death had been a Norwegian painter called Edvard Munch the painting was painted more than one hundred years after Jacques painting, and it was also called The Death of Marat. The similarities and