preview

The Terra Cotta Army : China 's First Emperor And The Birth Of A Nation

Good Essays

For my book review, I have read and evaluated John Mans book entitled The Terra Cotta Army: China’s First Emperor and the Birth of a Nation, published by Bantam Press. In this book review essay I will be talking about the Unification of China, The Terra Cotta Army, and the First Emperor. John Man’s main idea is the Unification of China in 221 BCE by king Ying Zheng also known as the First Emperor he ranks as one of the most historic events not only in Chinese history but also in world history. The story of the Qin Dynasty’s rise and sudden collapse has been told many times, mostly by Sima Qian, China 's first and greatest historian, at the beginning of the first century BCE. In 1974, the Yang brothers were farmers digging a well near the …show more content…

But is he really as bad as the book says? Well the first emperor did more good than harm like unifying china which is good. The Unification of China was important to a lot of people as an example it says in the book “Now…(the first emperor ) is seen farsighted ruler who destroyed the forces which had kept China divided, unified the nation and established the first centralized state…”. Finally the Terra Cotta Army in the book it talks about how the first emperor wants his army with him in the afterlife. He wants his army in the afterlife with him because he wants to continue ruling when he is dead. Also another reason he want his army with him when he has past is because he wants to be protected when he does his ruling in the afterlife. John Man 's book, The Terra Cotta Army is a combination of light historical entertainment and travelogue with archaeological factoids handpicked from specialist publications and interviews, the book is written in a lively and engaging style and extreme illustrated. For example he shows a picture of the First Emperors tomb and the terra cotta army pits. The pictures he has shown Man explains the dimensions and he words what he see to where we can visualized about what he is talking about . Although neither an academic historian, Man has done a creditable job of getting his facts right. He rightly dismisses the canard that each figure is the individualized portrait of an actual Qin

Get Access