Perception can be understood on the model of change. Aristotle started off by stating the explanation of perception as a physical-chemical process by atomist philosophers at that time ‘like is affect by like’ alleging that chemical elements in us meets the like elements in the things we perceive. If we do have the same elements inside our sense organs, it is then questioned as to why the sense-organs do not perceive themselves i.e. why doesn 't the eye see itself or why do part of the eye not see the other parts of the eye; why do they not produce perception without an external object? Aristotle then implant his explanation - that senses themselves are potentials and it is to be activated with something actual. With the example of wood as a fuel having a potential to be a fire but will not become so until something external “activates it” and burns it. The same way as man having the potential to sense but can only do so when something external makes them active. The activation process turns potentiality into actuality. To be affected or to be moved requires something active, like the wood example. Activity, the fullest kind of actuality, brings about this change. This change is then explained with the “like/unlike” theory. A thing can only be changed by a thing that’s unlike itself “for it is the unlike which is affected”. For example, a red cloth cannot be changed by a red dye; a drink of the room temperature cannot be heated nor cooled by the temperature of the room -
Almost everyone will agree that the brain is a powerful organ. The mind is capable of many things but Aristotle made efforts to show that the mind is capable of taking information from objects around us that we are conscious of. This is call sensory data. We use our mental power, which is our receptive intellect, to save up information in the form of concepts. This idea is call epistemological. If we look at this theory closely we will see that Aristotle is pointing out that if we learn by using our senses then it is natural that education will follow this pattern. He mentioned that if students examine objects then they should categorized and recognized similar objects. Therefore, by examining a chair, students will be able to tell that all chairs have legs.
Aristotle believes that sensory perception of material objects is knowledge and he says, "Our senses
Studies published in Chemosensory Perception show individuals with psychopathic traits may also have a weak sense of smell. The article ‘Psychopaths’ Have An Impaired Sense Of Smell, Study Suggests, which was published in Science Daily, has studies done by Mehmet Mahmut and Richard Stevenson in Australia. Previous research shows that the area of the brain dealing with empathy, something psychopaths do not use, and the olfactory sense are relatively near each other in the frontal cortex. The scientists took 70 non-criminal adults who volunteered for the study and began with assessing each participant’s accuracy and sensitivity to smell. Afterwards, they measured the individuals’ psychopathy levels. They did this by asking a series of questions
Jean Ayres an occupational therapist, developed the theory of sensory integration in 1960 (Smith, S., Mailloux, Z., & Erwin, B. n.d.). Jean Ayres defined sensory integration as “The neurological process that organizes sensations from one’s body and from the environment and makes it possible to use the body effectively in the environment” (Ayres,1989, p. 22). Occupational therapists are trained in adapting the environment to address such individual client needs (What Is Occupational Therapy, (n.d.). Jean Ayres believed that the various sensory systems allow us to successfully interact with the environment (Ayres, 1972, p. 1). Moreover, additional research also suggests that a child requires appropriate levels of arousal, orientation, and attention in order to interact and engage with the environment (Case-Smith & Bryan, 1999).
The Platonic separation of perception and knowledge proves to be problematic because it offers a powerfully complex record of recognition and its relationship to knowlege. As a consequence of its portrayal of judgment, the ideology gives unreasonable conclusions that every individual are faultlessly right at whatever point they see, accept, or think something. The undeniable misleading quality of this ideology demonstrates the hazardous philosophical errors that can result from the inaccurate thinking of sense awareness, while the supernatural assets that the hypothesis creates to portray recognition proves to offer a predominant representation of sense awareness.
"When a person glimpses the face of a famous actor, sniffs a favourite food or hears the voice of a friend, recognition is instant. Within a fraction of a second after the eyes, nose, ears, tongue or skin is stimulated, one knows the object is familiar and whether it is desirable or dangerous. How does such recognition, which psychologists call preattentive perception, happen so accurately and quickly, even when the stimuli are complex and the context in which they arise varies?
Because something cannot come from nothing there must be something which persists throughout every change. This the example of a white chair being painted black makes this concept clear. In this change, the chair changes color but matter of the chair remains the same. The underlying throughout the change is matter. Aristotle calls this type of change accidental change because the appearance or accident of the matter changes and not the matter itself. Like when a tomato changes from green to red, the matter of the tomato remains the same but the accidental, color, changes.
Perception begins with the recognition that signals are being sent. The initial recognition of signals is not random, but selective. A person chooses to encounter some signals but not others, and to pay attention to some but not others. Recognition does not equal communication, however, because at this point the perceiver may choose to "lose" the signal—^not to retain it.
Aristotle believes that sensory perception of material objects is knowledge and he says, "Our senses begin the