The Theory Vs. Iq Theory

Many psychologist believe there are multiple types of intelligence that determine your mental ability and have been an important topic for many years. Many of these psychologist have argued with each other on the multiple theories that the psychologist have developed, however there has been no clear agreement of what actually makes up your IQ or how it can be measured. The most famous psychologist that have developed theories of intelligence are Howard Gardner and Robert Sternberg, out of these two theories I agree with Robert Sternberg intelligence theory the most.

When one speaks of intelligence or how bright another person is, the often quoted figure is the IQ or intelligence quotient. It is the most often used standard of how smart a person is. This paper shall look at what intelligence tests measure, how the IQ tests measure intelligence and interrogate their history. It shall then apply the tests to school policy and hence evaluate their validity.

Intelligent quotient test is defined as a test that has been formulated and it is often used to measure human intelligence. There are many different types of IQ tests that are used to determine the level of intelligence between different test subjects. IQ testing has a wide range of application and in different specialized professions. Human resource managers have applied IQ testing as part of the tests administer during interviewing process. However, IQ testing has a wide application in research field where they are used to measure different traits across cultures or races. IQ testing has attracted many controversies, most of which support the assertion that IQ testing is indeed biased. This essay will present arguments in support of this standpoint.

An article posted in eHow.com stated that it is actually hard to design an assessment that is independent of learning and culture. Experts and test designers have struggled with this factors over the years. Cattel Culture-Fair and Raven progressive matrices are tests designed to prevent this through measuring intelligence separately of language ability. The second reason is IQ tests did not measure other types of intelligence. IQ tests did not measure other types of intelligence. More and more psychologists and educators have accepted theories for multiple intelligence since the 1980s. Types of intelligences proposed by Howard Garner are bodily kinesthetic intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, linguistic intelligence, logical mathematical intelligence, musical intelligence, naturalist intelligence and spatial intelligence. IQ tests did not measure the whole complexity of human intelligence. The tests only measure certain thinking skills, it did not include to measure the creativity, sensitivity of emotion, social understanding and other various skills. Traditionally, the tests assess on limited subjects such as reading comprehension, series or mathematics knowledge but they do not

How is intelligence measured? How is it possible to just have one way to measure intelligence? Is there really only one way to measure every individual’s intelligence? According to psychologists Howard Gardner and Robert Sternberg there is. Gardner and Sternberg have developed two different theories to do so. Howard Gardner’s theory of intelligence is the way in which one carries out life goals. Gardner chose eight abilities that held to meet criteria: linguistic (speak and write well), logical-mathematical (use logical and mathematical skills to solve problems such as scientific quotations), spatial (think and reason about objects in three dimensional space), musical (preform, understand and enjoy music), bodily-kinesthetic (manipulate

Society tends to measure and classify people by their intelligence, but what is intelligence? A tropical approach to Lifespan Development describes intelligence as “the ability to solve problems” and “the capacity to adapt and learn from experience.” However, some famous scientists and philosophers gave their own thoughts about intelligence, for example, Albert Einstein proclaimed "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination" and on the other hand, Socrates said, "I know that I am intelligent because I know that I know nothing." I have believed that all concepts are different, but all of them are valid and relevant.

The term intelligence begs an important question. How can something be measured when it is indefinable? Numerous scientists, psychologists, theorists, neurologists, and many more can concur that intelligence does exist. Yet, to date, none of them can agree upon a universal definition. Therefore, intelligence is known only to be a scientific construct. (Floyd & Kranzler, 2013). Over the years, individuals have attempted to delimit intelligence by means of research, assessments, and theories. Beginning as early as the 19th century, Francis Joseph Gall, presented the scientific measuring tool known as phrenology. He believed mental qualities and functions could be evaluated according to specific faculties mapped out in the brain. (CIA textbook)

Intelligence, what exactly is intelligence? To some it might just be a score on a test, for others like myself it goes far beyond tests, but what exactly is it? Intelligence has been defined in many ways including one’s capacity for logic, abstract thought, understanding, self-awareness, communication, learning, emotional knowledge, memory, planning, creativity and problem solving. Other definitions portray intelligence to be less complex and more of a single general ability. Intelligence has been one of the most controversial topics among psychologists and you see why that is. My take on intelligence is very dimensional, meaning how can we really measure intelligence if we’re not even 100% sure of what it really is. I believe all human beings have the audacity and

In the 21th century the new controversial debate about IQ testing involves the many flaws and incorrect way to assess an individual. Today, many scientists have dismissed the myth of an IQ scale, which people used to fall under high or low intelligence. The question that both people and experts trying to answer “Kids who score higher on IQ tests will, on average, go on to do better in conventional measures of success in life?” (Balter, 2011, para. 1). The debate among researchers is what IQ test actually measure, and the differences in scores between ethnic groups reflect intelligence, economic, and social factors maybe even both. According to Richard Nisbett a psychologist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in his book "Intelligence

IQ tests may still be useful in certain institutional contexts, or as just one feature of a more thorough and nuanced evaluation of a student. As Gaunle (2011) states, "it would be a mistake to discard the IQ tests despite its flaws." However, IQ tests must never be the only means by which to measure intelligence. There are too many types of intelligence to rely on just one test to measure it. Moreover, the IQ test is inherently flawed in that it "does not, and cannot, take into account the mood of the person whose intellect is being evaluated," ("Behavior, Race, and IQ," 1970). If the person taking the test is uncomfortable, angry, or scared, those feelings might impact test scores. IQ tests might not even measure innate abilities but instead, culturally-acquired types of knowledge and intelligence.

An individual’s intelligence is determined by their IQ, also known as Intelligence Quotient, which is characterized as mental skills that allow an individual to engage in problem solving situations and the capability to learn.

According to current standards, before an intelligence test can be used to assess intelligence, it must meet certain criteria. An intelligence test must be reliable (“How Do We Measure Intelligence?”). The reliability of a test refers to the consistency of the results of test-takers (“How Do You Measure Intelligence?”). If a test shows significant variation in its scores, then the results cannot be considered accurate. Inaccurate scores cannot be used for other purposes such as predicting future information. An intelligence test must be

Psychologists have long debated how to best conceptualize and measure intelligence. Many different neuroscientists and psychologists alike have discovered many different types of intelligence- including academic, emotional, fluid, specific, analytical, creative, and intelligence (Omichinski). Other researchers have proposed even more types of intelligences - psychologist L. L. Thurstone proposed that there were seven clusters of “primary mental abilities”, which make up of word fluency, verbal comprehension, spatial ability, perceptual speed, numerical ability, inductive reasoning, and memory (Sternberg). Although each type of intelligence serves its own unique importance, it is imperative that they should not be looked at and judged individually when measuring and evaluating one's intelligence. Traditional IQ tests strictly measure reasoning and problem-solving abilities, therefore neglecting other equally significant areas of a the brain (Grewal & Salovey). This calls into question whether or not IQ tests, and other traditional forms of “intelligence” measurements are the most cumulative and accurate way to measure each aspect of a person’s intellect. Intelligence, in actuality, is both the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations, and the act of understanding. Based on these definitions, there is not a single intelligence that dominates over another; they all work together in unison in order to

How do we measure intelligence? The term used to denote measurable intelligence is psychometric intelligence. There are many tests to indicate intelligence; some are special aptitudes tests, and others, general intelligence tests. One test, called the SB5 for short, measures five aspects of intelligence; fluid reasoning, knowledge, quantitative reasoning, visual-spatial processing, and working memory.

The definition of intelligence is very broad and includes different tasks and abilities that need to be observed as well as one’s life experiences and learned knowledge to be demonstrated. Many factors can affect the measurement of intelligence on a test. The test designer’s definition of intelligence and the attentiveness of the person giving the test are just two factors. Other possible factors affecting the outcome of the test are coaching or practicing prior to the test, interaction