preview

The Vietnam War: Song Analysis

Good Essays

By the conclusion of the 1960s, one of the most tumultuous and divisive decades in modern American history, the Vietnam War was fought on not one, but two battle fronts — the horrific jungles of Southeast Asia, and at home, in the hearts and minds of the millions of American families torn to shreds by the conflict. As the war dredged along, passive complacency regarding Vietnam was replaced with a fiery pacifistic passion, driving students to protest the war at Kent State University in Kent, Ohio on May 4, 1970, culminating in the tragic deaths of four innocent students at the hands of the Ohio National Guard. In response to the chaotic and corrupt sociopolitical culture of the time, popular musicians all across the nation wrote songs that …show more content…

For instance, the song “Ohio” seems to lament the Kent State shootings at the surface level, but from a more analytic perspective, condemns Richard Nixon and the United States military for their irresponsible and unwarranted actions in the Vietnam war, which will be discussed more later in the paper. The mood and tone of the song, which captures the frustration that the youth of America felt regarding Nixon regarding the war in Vietnam when this song, parallels the mood and tone of Starr’s motown classic, “War.” Much like “Ohio,” “War” also delivers a clear and powerful mood and tone of frustration towards the powers that be regarding the war and its drastic effects on society. “War” differs from “Ohio” in the method that it uses to portray this mood, in that “Ohio” utilizes a somewhat typical chorus-verse style to deliver its message, while “War” relies on audience involvement through the use of a call-and-response technique. Throughout the song, Starr takes on the role of a feux-preacher, begging his audience to join with him as they sing, equating their beliefs that the war in Vietnam is worthless and detrimental to society. In spite of these similarities in mood and tone, the two songs could not be more different from a musical perspective, as “Ohio” uses …show more content…

The Atlantic Records approach to creating music utilized a “bottom-up” method in which the artists would produce music that impacted them personally, writing the lyrics and instrumentals themselves, then recording their songs on their own time. This approach to music production allows for the artist to have free reign over the own product, which, consequently, allowed for songs like “Ohio” to be recorded while current events were still fresh and artists still felt a true passion about the subject matter of the music they recorded. For example, Neil Young wrote the song “Ohio” immediately after he learned of the shootings at Kent State. Then, he and David Crosby flew to Los Angeles where they met with Graham Nash and Stephen Stills and recorded the song live. Upon hearing the song, the owner of Atlantic Records, Ahmet Ertegun, rushed to have the song produced and made available to the American Public. Due to their haste and passion, “Ohio” was being played across the nation while the wounds of the Kent State Shooting were still fresh. In his book, 33 Revolutions per Minute: A History of Protest Songs from Billie Holiday to Green Day, Dorian Lynskey attests to this poignancy, arguing that, “‘Ohio’ is perhaps the most powerful topical song ever recorded: moving,

Get Access