Consequently exposing those targeted communities’ cultural practices and institutions to promote and later perpetuate several negative stereotypes.
Yes, we know the War on Drugs was meant to eradicate the use of controlled substances and with intentions to destroy the way in which controlled substances are distributed, but this is only half the story. In actuality, the government’s efforts to try to control the use of drugs, hence the War on drugs, was also a way for privileged groups to express racial power as Michelle Alexander eluded to. The War on Drugs has a direct correlation to race. As we see, anti-drug policies are more geared toward people of color such as African Americans. These policies profoundly affect African American communities.
…show more content…
His administration also launched a public relations campaign to change the American public view of drugs. In the center of all this, was the idea to demonize drugs and its users. Even though at this time, the drug problem was at an all-time low. Presidents Bush and Clinton aided in this campaign by also increasing the spending for the anti-drug campaign and intensified drug law enforcement. It almost seemed that no matter who was in office or occupied the executive branch, they never deviated from their overall anti-drug policies throughout the War on Drugs. With the growing support of this new war, policy makers had all they needed to move on to the next step of …show more content…
Due to the constant reference to war, it was ok to use military-like force, even if it was against American citizens. It was easy to find an enemy; African American were the prefect target. We were just being liberated, we had freedom to go to school and get the jobs that were formerly reserved just for whites. Now white Americans had to compete with people who were once thought of as 3/5 human. Now it’s clear why it was so easy to make African Americans the enemy. Hispanics, and other people of color were constructed as the enemy in the War on Drugs as well. Research shows that the whole anti-drug rhetoric was planned out. Its design was so perfect, that it was able to tap into the American public’s psychology and place cultural attitudes about people of color and their supposed involvement with drugs and other illegal behaviors in their minds. The drug war required both weapons and enemies. The police and our law enforcement policy of prohibition and interdiction provided the weapons, and even though it was stated that the war on drugs was against drug cartels or international drug traders, the opposite occurred. We see the people mostly
After getting the public support for his campaign, America saw an unprecedented rise in its incarceration rate, particularly among African Americans. The “ War on Drugs ” has had a disparate impact on the black community even though blacks and whites use drugs at approximately the same levels. This is achieved through a myriad of formal and informal practices. African-Americans are targeted and prosecuted at a much higher rate even though they are not statistically any likelier to abuse or sell drugs than the white population.
The facts speak for themselves, people of color are the enemies and targets in the war on drugs. They also tell us that fighting back is useless due to the racial bias that is inherent in the criminal justice system. This might come as a surprise to the majority that believe discrimination is no longer in existence, considering that it is a black man living in the White House. Ever since Barack Obama pledged to serve as the forty-fourth president
Alexander claims that the sole reason that the war on drugs was started was to maintain the racist nature that faces America. Alexander realizes that even though the Jim Crow Laws were eradicated, we have just reshaped the ways in which we decide to ruin lives. As the old adage says, “The more things change, the more they remain the same”. I think to a certain point Americans need to have reassurance that things really are changing and here’s where Jim Crow ends, but in the background the powerful people in this country had to come up with a new plan to feed their racist nature. One politician after another want to show how tough they can be on drugs. Each wanting to be stronger than the other. They didn’t care who they were hurting on the bottom, as long as they looked extra tough.
Throughout history, the drug war has always targeted minority groups. “At the root of the drug-prohibition movement in the United States is race, which is the driving force behind the first laws criminalizing drug use, which first appeared as early as the 1870s (Cohen, 56)”. There were many drug laws that targeted minority groups such as the marijuana ban of 1930s that criminalized Mexican migrant farm workers and in the Jim Crow South, reformist wanted to wage war on the Negro cocaine feign so they used African Americans as a scapegoat while they overlooked southern white women who were a bigger problem for the drug epidemic (Cohen, 57). Instead of tackling the root of the drug problem they passed the blame to struggling minority groups within the United States.
The War on Drugs, a term that was first popularized by former president Richard Nixon in 1971, was the start of a governmental war on drug abuse, whether it be against those selling narcotics or the ones using them. Over the years, many claims have come to light, arguing that this so called “war” was one waged to oppress minorities, especially impoverished African-Americans in America’s inner city. This program was one that exploited African-Americans who were struggling after the government failed them, leaving them to fend for themselves and making decisions based on their socioeconomic status. Throughout this paper, the sociological theories pertaining to the attack on African-Americans by the government through the means of a proxy war
Even though drug laws are shown to be neutral and have no targeted audience, it can be implied that the War on Drugs was set in place to have Blacks arrested at an alarming rate to. African-Americans also have a disproportionately high
According to “The Apocalypse Now : The Lost War on Drugs”, the United States federal government began to become tough on “crime” especially drug offenses in the 1970’s under President Richard Nixon. Nixon stated that “drugs were public enemy #1” and that he was going to be tough on this crime. As a result, state level government began to create policies that were strict on drug offenses causing minimal sentencing for minor drug offenses. Instead of going after the root of the problem which was preventing drugs from entering the country, these laws targeting low income communities with predominantly black and Latino residents. In addition, these merciless laws were the cause of the significant amount of people, specifically men of color, in prison during the 1980’s “war on drugs” in the United States.
Doris Marie Provine writes her book, Unequal under law: Race in the War on Drugs, to inform her audience that race plays a key role in the War on Drugs. She writes about how this war has become a war on race rather than a war intended to improve drug abuse. Provine begins her book with some background on the first account of the “war on drugs”. She describes how the prohibition age was the beginning of this war which targeted women and blacks. In Unequal under law, Provine explains how different race groups have been given crime labels. Africans have been labeled as the cocaine abusers, Mexicans are known as the weed smokers, and Chinese are deemed the opium addicts. She argues that the government supported the war on drugs although it knew
The United States used War on Drugs as the reason to have mass incarceration and arrest people of color, especially the black people. The government arrest the black people into jail by accuse them selling or consuming crack cocaine, however, it is the government (CIA) who allowed guerrilla armies to bring the crack cocaine to the black neighborhood. The War on Drugs is just one of the excuse that government used to put black Americans into jail and this mass incarceration is their tool for social control. This way, they can separate the white people and people of color and maintain their racial hierarchy.
On estimate 1 out of every 111 adults will be arrested for drug charges. Out of males that have been imprisoned 57% were black or latino which feeds into the common argument that the Drug War causes a racial divide. Throughout the countless years of battling the number of casualties of both races have been expanding and on average over the past seven years. 165,000 documented homicides have occurred in Mexico alone, due to drug war violence. Not only has the Drug War cost billions, imprisoned millions and killed thousands and continues to do so daily.
The war on drugs has been viewed as a discriminatory process because it has led to the captivity of more Africans Americans than slavery. American prisons house more African Americans due to discriminatory mandatory sentencing and misguided drug laws since the drug war began in the 1970s (page
These people believe the war on drugs should not be viewed as a war against a particular collection of inanimate objects, but a convenient, yet inaccurate, representation. To ones that oppose the War on Drugs being all about race, they believe it should be understood as a special case of what war has always been-the engagement of force and violence against certain communities, and/or their institutions, in order to attain certain political objectives. Race has played an important role over the years in identifying the communities that became the targets of the drug war, consequently exposing their cultural practices and institutions to military-style attack and police control. Although the drug war has certainly sought to eradicate controlled substances and destroy the systems recognized for their circulation, this is only part of the story. Ones with this state of mind believe that state efforts to control drugs are also a way for dominant groups to express racial power. Overall, the significance of the drug trade and the oppression of African people and other people of color, they believe one must recognize the central role that drug trafficking has played and the maintenance of white supremacy worldwide. Addictive and harmful substances have historically been used to undermine societies and further white
The War on Drugs is a term that is commonly applied to the campaign of prohibition of drugs. The goal of this campaign is to reduce the illegal drug trade across America. This term “ War on Drugs” was used during Nixon’s campaign in which he declared War on Drugs during a press conference in 1971. Following this declaration many organizations were created to stop the spread of drugs, like the DEA and Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement. Note that Nixon’s approach to this problem was to fund treatment rather than law enforcement. After Nixon’s retirement from office, most of the funding went from going into treatment to the law enforcement. Which militarized the police force giving the officer’s military weapons and gear. With this, the sentencing for possessing drugs was changed as well, resulting incarcerations rates to increase overtime. The increase of incarceration rates started to create many patterns that were soon noticeable. The funding’s that go into the law enforcement has shown to greatly have an affect on the incarceration rates.
The War on Drugs, like the war on Terrorism, is a war that America may not be able to afford to win. For over forty years the United States has been fighting the War on Drugs and there is no end in sight. It has turned into a war that is about politics and economics rather than about drugs and criminals. The victims of this war are numerous; but perhaps they are not as numerous as those who benefit from the war itself.
The beginning of the drug war was caused by the fear of the mass migration of ethnic minorities would disrupt the hierarchy system that maintains ‘social orders’ in America (Johnson & Jones, 1998). In order for the rulers to remain in power over the powerless, they had to label behaviours as deviant through rule making and rule enforcement (Johnson & Jones, 1998). Out of dissatisfaction or fear of the existing conditions, the rule makers “may assign ‘new’ meanings to certain behaviours and transform public perceptions by introducing new images, or targets for law enforcement” to benefit or protect themselves (Johnson & Jones, 1998, p.986). This was evident through the media by largely portraying drug dealers as black, violent, powerful and rebellious against legal authorities (Provine, 2011). In 1993, over 64% of Americans believed that drug use was a critical cause of crime, and is mostly associated with African-American (Johnson & Jones, 1998). The powerful were successful in using political power to create stereotypes and unequal law enforcement to free themselves from charges of crimes, such as white-collar crimes and human rights abuse, by diverting the public’s attention to drug-related crimes (Bradley &