The Western Way Of War Essay

refute the argument that the prolonged and bloody stalemate of World War I stemmed from a slavish adherence to the theories proposed by Clausewitz Major Marc C. Jeter H100: Rise of the Western Way of War 10 June 2015 The stalemate of World War I’s Western Front resulted from a situation where leaders experienced and educated in 19th Century tactics and strategy could not reconcile this “predisposition” with the changes to war brought on by technological advances and not due to a mindless adherence

Unique System of War Finance, Highly Aggressive Military Tradition, and Emphasis on Innovation are the five principles of the Western Way of War. Having a unique system of war finance, emphasis on innovation, and discipline are the aspects of the western way of war that describe warfare in the age of Napoleon (1789-1815). Unique systems of finance such as nation state resources, levee en masse, and alliances provided the means to build, strengthen, and maintain military forces for war. Innovation was

forces must always be dominant consideration because destruction of the enemy forces is the overriding principle of war.” --- Carl Von Clausewitz.[footnoteRef:1] [1: ] Introduction The heavy reliance on superior military technology, increase armaments, and understanding the importance of kinship and culture are three significant drawbacks associated with the Western Way of War. Due to limited military technological advantages, disrupted revolution of military armaments and strained the economy

whether there lands would be free or slave states. As a result of the Mexican War, the U.S. men vast new land holdings in the West, fueling a debate between the North and South over the extensions of slavery into the West. This sectional strife over slavery’s extension was a major factor in the eventual commencement of the Civil War. Through accentuating divisions between the North and South over the control of Western lands, the debate over slavery’s extension clearly influenced the Civil War’s

Through separate publications, Geoffrey Parker and Victor Hanson describe principal foundations (Parker) and a prominent element (Hanson) that serve as the basis for their argument in defining a Western Way of War. However, both men fall short in clearly describing what is a true Western Way of War. Both the principal foundations by Parker and the prominent element by Hanson, while insightful, only delineate a single type of warfare that was used by the armies of Europe and the United States, however

explain war? To answer a question like this, one must look to the scholarship. However, works alone cannot explain the total scope of war, which means that historians take from the scholarship, and input what they deem necessary to the explanation of war. The Western experiences of war shaped the outcome of further study into warfare. Authors like Victor Davis Hanson, John Lynn, John Keegan, Martin van Creveld, and Niall Ferguson explain in detail to what extent the Western way of war is superior

to war as a fundamental way to settle their differences. War, per Clausewitz is the act of force to compel the enemy to do our will. Sun-Tzu believed that war was to subdue the enemy without fighting. However it is defined, every culture has its motives for why they go to war and how it should be conducted. Western states attempt to settle their differences by diplomatic means; when diplomacy fails, war ensues. War is often used as the means to an end and according to Clausewitz “war is the

Since the beginning of time, humanity has resorted to war as a fundamental way to settle their differences. Clausewitz described war as the act of force to compel the enemy to do our will. Sun-Tzu believed the purpose of war was to subdue the enemy without fighting. Regardless of the definition, every culture has its motives for why it goes to war and how it should be conducted. Nation states go to war to gain access to new territories and resources, settle religious differences, and defend

All Quiet On The Western Front All Quiet On The Western Front hmm, that is an understatement when talking about WWI. This war involves such violent and gruesome events it’s kind of hard to believe heroes/U.S. soldiers made it back home alive. In Eric Maria Remarque’s land work war novel, All Quiet On The Western Front, illustrates how war is hell on the soldiers who served in WWI. In the novel, Paul Baumer, is a front soldier fighting for the German army; he shares/tells/narrates a first-hand account

Humanity has resorted to war as a fundamental way to settle their differences. Clausewitz describes war as the act of force to compel the enemy to do our will. Sun-Tzu believed that war was to subdue the enemy without fighting. However it is defined, every culture has its motives for why they go to war and how it should be conducted. Nation states go to war to gain access to new territories and resources, settle religious differences, defend against a threat, and for no other reason than