preview

Tombs In Vergina

Better Essays

In 1977 when renowned excavator Manolis Andronikos founded the Vergina tombs the main debate was, and still is to this day, about whom could the remains in Tomb II be identified as. Three tombs were discovered at Vergina and the evidence found in these quickly allowed researches to conclude that those buried at Vergina were from a family of royalty. The evidence from the grave offerings suggested that they were buried in the later half of the 4th Century and the age that researches identified the remains as left only two options as to who could be buried in Tomb II; Philip II King of Macedon or Philip III of Arrhidaeus. There is a copious amount of evidence towards both sides of this debate and no one is yet to have a definitive argument. However, when looking at the evidence I am going to argue that Philip II is the most likely candidate for the burials in Tomb II in Vergina. From the abundance of grave-goods uncovered at Vergina it did not take long for Andronikos …show more content…

Andronicus has implied that because the frieze had a bearded man and a younger man with distinct eyes, and that these were characteristics known to Philip II and Alexander IV that this was therefore a painting of them and therefore Philip IIs’ tomb (Reference). It can be argued that just because a painting has a man with a beard does not necessarily indicate it is Philip II and it can also be said that the tomb did belong to Philip III and this painting was there as they were part of his family. When Archaeologists discover ancient sites there are many factors that have to be considered when identifying its surroundings and objects. Despite an abundance of materials indicating that Tomb II belonged to Philip II and not Philip III of Arrhidaeus, it still cannot be concluded that this is the

Get Access