Trans Mountain Pipeline Case Study

To indroduce, "the government of Canada granted approval for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project to proceed with 157 conditions (NEB)." The project includes a lot of infomation for operating. "The project proposes to expand the existing Trans Mountain pipeline system between Edmonton, AB and Burnaby, BC ,and this project includes approximately 987 km of new pipeline ,and there is new and modified facilities such as pump stations and tanks and reactivate 193 km of existing pipeline (NEB)." Moreover, this project increases the capacity of shipping from 300,000 barrels per day to 980,000 barrels per day, which brings a lot of benefits to Canadian economy (NEB). Therefore, the approval of this project not only contains many economic benefits

The Keystone XL Pipeline is a proposed oil system that expands from Hardisty, Alberta to Port Arthur, Texas. Stretching 1,661 miles long and 36 inches’ wide the TransCanada pipeline would carry tar sands oil, one of the world's dirtiest fuels. The Keystone XL Pipeline would nearly double the amount of the amount of

Almost 95 million barrels of oil and fuel are produced each day in order to provide energy and fuel to people the world over. A major component of the oil industry is the transportation of oil through various means including oil pipelines. These pipelines are capable of transporting thousands of barrels of oil thousands of miles per day. In the United States one possible pipeline has caused a lot of controversy and discussion on the impact it will have on the United States. The difficulty in deciding if the Keystone XL Pipeline should be built is in whether the possibility of economic growth outweighs the possibility of environmental destruction. In order to make a decision, one must first look into the history of oil pipelines. It is crucial

The Northern Gateway Oil Pipeline. MJ Whiticar University of Vancouver. 2012. http://www.energybc.ca/issues/northerngateway.html. Retrieved on March 10, 2013.

While originally designed to meet the needs of Canadian citizens, shrewd US businessmen saw an opportunity and formed a US company, TransCanada Pipelines, in 1954,

The Keystone Pipeline already exists and runs from “oil sand fields in Alberta, Canada into the US, ending in Cushing, Oklahoma” (What is the Keystone XL Pipeline?). The current topic concerning this pipeline is the expansion of the pipeline to create the Keystone XL Pipeline, which will consist of “1,700 new miles of pipeline” (What is the Keystone XL Pipeline?). This project would offer expansion from Cushing, Oklahoma to the Gulf Coast of Texas, “where oil refineries abound”, and expansion from Alberta to Kansas, allowing for the pipeline to “pass through a region where oil extraction is …booming” (What is the Keystone XL Pipeline?).

Intended as a cooperative effort between the U.S. and Canadian governments as well as private companies in both countries, the proposed TransCanada KXL would complement the current Keystone oil pipeline (TransCanada, 2017). The KXL is to take a more direct route across both countries, the path of which (Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Nebraska) is a subject of much controversy both in Canada and the United States.

Oil sands are a combination of sand, water, clay, and bitumen. Extraction of oil sands can create petroleum products that are efficient. With several economic advantages of importing such a powerful source of energy, Enbridge proposed the Northern Gateway pipeline project which was a plan to build twin pipelines from Bruderheim, Alberta to Kitimat, British Columbia for the transportation of natural gas and diluted bitumen from the Athabasca

The Mackenzie Valley Pipeline is a project being done from the Beaufort sea through Canada’s Northwest Territories where natural gas is transport in order to tie into gas pipelines located in northern Alberta. What they're trying to accomplish is to design, build, and use it safely. While building it there trying to stay eco friendly. There trying to have it built by

On March 23, almost 27 years to the day following the historic Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska, Donald Trump issued a presidential permit to the Canadian company, TransCanada for its controversial Keystone XL pipeline, formally restarting a fight over the pipeline that first kicked off when it was first proposed in 2008. Those opposing the pipeline had scored a major victory in November 2015 when President Obama rejected the project saying it wouldn’t help the economy or increase the United States’ energy security. A change in leadership, however, has fueled a move away from clean energy and fighting climate change and embracing the fossil fuel-driven economic

Over the years, TransCanada has sought the approval of a pipeline that runs from Canada through the Midwest of The United States. Known as The Keystone XL pipeline, it has been plagued by both civilian and Political protests. In 2015, the Obama administration denied TransCanada’s permit application, effectively halting the construction (Rocco, 2017). The project has already completed manufacturing almost all components of the pipeline, which most are being stored in various warehouses across The United States (Rocco, 2017). Arkansas produced 700 miles of the pipe that would have been laid if the project went forward (Rocco, 2017). Earlier this month, newly elected President Donald Trump, signed an executive order that allowed

Earlier this year construction was started on an oil pipeline that would carry 400,000 barrels of oil a day from the Brakken and Three Forks region of North Dakota down to an existing pipeline in Illinois travelling through South Dakota and Iowa. It’s being built by a company called Energy Transfer Partners, and its total costs are around $3.7 million dollars. This company says that the reason for the pipeline is to lessen reliance on foreign oils, and that it is more environmentally safe than having the oil transfer by railways or by trucks. They also cite its economic benefits which include 8,000-12,000 jobs in construction and

The Canadian company, TransCanada, initially proposed the pipeline in 2005 and applied to the State Department for a construction permit in 2008. The State Department has the permitting authority for the project because it crosses an international border, and the secretary of state must determine whether the project is “in the national interest”—a decision that includes economic, environment, national security and foreign policy consequences. In January 2014, the state department released an environmental impact statement concluding that the pipeline was unlikely to significantly increase the rate of carbon pollution in the atmosphere. That analysis kicked off a 90-day review process in which Secretary of State John Kerry requested comment from eight other agencies including E.P.A. and the Commerce Defense and Homeland Security departments. The State department just finished collecting comments from agencies as to whether the project is in the nation’s best interest. Once Secretary of State John Kerry revised the comments, he sent a recommendation to Obama, who make the final decision.

Speak with anybody in the oil business and they will portray pipelines as the vital expressways that convey Canada 's unlimited assets to a ravenous world market; con-structing more pipelines, they say, will be critical for Canada’s future prosperity. Speak with environmentalists or most people living where a noteworthy pipeline is proposed to go through, and you regularly get an altogether different picture; pipelines conveying bi-tumen from the oil sands are only accident waiting to happen leading to ecological calam-ity. With regards to building new pipeline foundation, a lot is on the line for Canada, which is the reason the rhetoric is so very charged and the civil argument so noisy and tumultuous. Alberta 's oil-sands, obviously, are at the heart of the issue, since most real pipelines being proposed and awaiting anticipated endorsement are intended to get that oil to the world market. The oil sands are the third biggest oil holding on the planet, after Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, with more than 168 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Pipe-lines are the vital economic life savers of practically every action of regular daily existence (Exchange, 2014). When we go on vacation, we need to fly to another place or drive to the airport by car. All that fuel was conveyed by pipeline. We fly in a plane that is con-trolled by air fuel. Stream fuel sets out by pipeline to each significant air terminal. We purchase family necessities at the nearby supermarket, which are loaded by

So,having that easy access to the oil will benefit a lot. They are setting up the pipelines through North Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. (Energy transfer)The pipeline reaches 1172 miles and has a 30 inch diameter pipeline, The