Tyrannicide In Julius Caesar Research Paper

Philosophical thinker John Locke spoke on the rights of revolution, and how every man was given the birth-right of overthrowing restricting power. In multiple cases, the only means of challenging the vigors is death and brute force as demonstrated with Brutus in the tragedy Julius Caesar. These acts of violence demonstrate the will of the people -- the distance they are willing to go for their beliefs. When culminating their numbers, this will inevitably lead to the downfall of a once great leader. This is called the epitaph of a tyrant, the death of a controlling iron first -- a synonym for the dawn of a new day.

Julius Caesar was a military commander that emerged from the chaos of civil war to take charge of the republic. He later became known as the dictator of Rome, the absolute ruler of Rome. He made many reforms and created a new program to employ the jobless and gave public land to the poor. Julius Caesar was a powerful man and becoming too powerful was what led him to corruption. The Senate was afraid and jealous of his power and they were worried he might plan to make himself king of Rome. Needless to say, the Senate wanted to save the republic and so they went against him. Julius Caesar became corrupt because he was too powerful, the Senate was jealous, and his actions posed a threat.

Power is the ultimate goal of many throughout their life. If power is taken advantage of it

Gaius Julius Caesar will be remembered as a strong leader, and a man loved by his soldiers and the people alike. However, Caesar also manipulated and used the people of Rome in his search for complete power and control. Some might say Caesar was doing what was good and necessary for his nation. This is not the case. With all of his radical reforms, Caesar overstepped his boundaries as consul, and never looked back. He used his power to advance his military and political agendas. Furthermore, Caesar acted as a traitor to the Roman government. He redistributed land and wealth, taking the patricians’ hard earned land and giving it to the plebeians and even foreigners. He seemed to regard foreigners more highly even than the Roman people. This is shown when he awarded many Roman citizenships to foreigners, and even gave them a major role in the Senate, expanding it by 300 members, an action that again overstepped his permissions as consul.

Brutus, Cassius, Caesar, and the other Senators held the power to do things others could not. With this authority came their ability to use poor judgement. In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar the theme Power Corrupts is arrayed thoroughly. Murder, treason, and ethical/moral corruption were three prevalent themes that proved the overall topic of Power Corrupts.

Julius Caesar was among the most powerful Roman dictator in ancient Roman Empire. Caesar was becoming powerful and popular that he was the ancient Roman citizen’s conqueror. His unique leadership became his way forward to consulship in 59 B.C. and ultimately a powerful ruler. His power became a fear for Roman ruling class. His power controlled the three important areas in Roman’s life: the military, religion, and politics. His power allowed him to establish a rule to control Rome. In 46 B.C, Caesar secured his office to become a dictator for ten years, which many prominent ruling class was zealously hated him. His dictatorship secured his position as a ruler. Julius Caesar wanted the shift and improved the life of Romans; even so, he needs the blessing of the Senate to pass his laws. The Roman Senate could block the passing of laws which would aid the Roman state. But, Caesar was found not to be manipulated by the Senate. He increased the number of senators to nine hundred to fill vacant positions. He selected senators for a variety of places and positions. The new appointed senators outnumbered the old senate position, mostly supporters of Caesar. Ceasar’s rule was instrumental in reforming and transforming Roman empire. He improved the Roman calendar, and re-arranged the local form of government. He then

Julius Caesar was a ruler of Ancient Rome during the time 46-44 B.C. He expanded the Roman Empire through a series of battles across Europe before declaring himself a dictator for life. He is often remembered for being one of the greatest military minds in history and should be credited with laying the foundation for the Roman Empire (History.com, 2009). He was born into a highly recognized congressional family and was the nephew of another prominent Roman general, Marius (History.com, 2009). Caesar's rule, however, proved to be instrumental in reforming Ancient Rome for his fellow countrymen by relieving debt and increasing the size of the Senate and opening it up to

Was Julius Caesar really going to be a “tyrant” was he really going to make his people slave? Caesar’s death had a great impact on the plebeian’s. Brutus and the conspirators thought they have done a great thing for Rome. Brutus only cared about himself and didn’t realize Cassius was only using him. Brutus doesn’t know if Caesar was really going to make the people in Rome, slaves, but Brutus decided to kill him anyways. Although, Caesar’s had a great impact on the plebeian’s. Brutus used logic and reasoning so the plebeian’s wouldn’t be mad at him. Antony uses his emotions to convince the plebeian’s that Brutus and the conspirators are murderers. These speeches show how both Antony and Brutus tried convincing the plebeians which side they should

The aim of a dictator is to gain complete control over every aspect of a nation or empire, so it is to be expected that this control would extend to their natural and architectural surroundings. Julius Caesar and Adolf Hitler were two such domineering men, with definitive ideas of how their land should appear and function. This essay will explore how two dictators, living thousands of years apart (100-44 BC and 1889-1945, respectively) controlled the design and building of their landscapes. Specific attention will be paid to how each man’s political principles are represented through one iconic symbol of his architectural choices (in this case, the Forum of Julius Caesar in Rome, Italy and the Reichsparteitagsgelände-Nazi party rally grounds-in

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar In most situations too much power is never good, but with power spread out throughout everyone is more effective. Eventually all power tends to have something bad happen, which sometimes is resolved quickly. But with absolute power most things go wrong with the power most or all of the time. For Brutus wanted to have power over Caesar because of what he thought he would do and became more of a ruler.

A representative is nothing more and nothing less. When the public cannot or refuses to support injustice, action will rise. Without checks and balances in place and enforced, dictatorship takes rise. In the end, the government or citizens themselves imprison or assassinate the dictator. For example, Rome's Julius Caesar, Spain's Francisco Franco, Italy's Benito Mussolini, Germany's Adolf Hitler, and Russia's Joseph Stalin were assassinated, or attempted to assassinate, or committed suicide. In order to prevent further blood shed and tyranny, the Senators deemed it necessary to assassinate Julius Caesar after he declared himself as dictator for life. Modern principles of justice indicate no individual – citizen, representative, or foreign authority

The Dangers of Power Abraham Lincoln once stated “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” A key term Lincoln uses in his statement is character, which means respectable and ethical qualities. In addition, Lincoln’s statement includes the term power which is defined as possession or control over others. Taken as a whole, Lincoln means that some people can overcome hardships but authority and power can cause their honor and ethics to change. Moreover, Lincoln implies in his statement that it is easy for the powerless to be gentle, however, power can alter one’s honor and morals.

There were many reasons for people to kill Caesar but few were used. Their reasons can be seen as self evident when 33 senators kill a prospective strongman dictator and then devolve into civil war. As logical or moral the arguments are they are at least somewhat diverse if not particularly well phrased.

We as a republic, must stay together during this state of war. We need a leader. This war must continue, in order to find our rightful leader. Our current leaders declare war, but it is us who must fight and die for our future. Rome shall not fall with Caesar, and it is our duty to make this true. As Antony said, our noble leader Caesar included us in his will. Caesar was a good man and these murderous assassins are traitors! We must seek out and kill these traitors in the name of Caesar, and let none survive. Brutus says that Caesars sin was his ambition, yet he rejected the crown three times. This is not ambition, and Brutus as well as the rest of the conspirators are liars. Let us get our revenge on these traitors, and avenge Caesars death.

Evil- “profound immorality, wickedness, and depravity, especially when regarded as a supernatural force” (“The Definition of Evil”). In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Cassius and Antony are both evil in the play, to show evil conquers over nobility. The reasoning behind this statement is, Cassius manipulates Brutus into agreeing to kill Caesar, so Brutus himself can rule Rome. Caesar is brutally murdered by the persuasiveness of Cassius, but with the help of Brutus and many more. Lastly, Antony defeats Brutus and Cassius at the battle of Phillippi.