The Dangers of Power
Abraham Lincoln once stated “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” A key term Lincoln uses in his statement is character, which means respectable and ethical qualities. In addition, Lincoln’s statement includes the term power which is defined as possession or control over others. Taken as a whole, Lincoln means that some people can overcome hardships but authority and power can cause their honor and ethics to change. Moreover, Lincoln implies in his statement that it is easy for the powerless to be gentle, however, power can alter one’s honor and morals. Finally, when looked under the lens of William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln’s statement can be proven valid through Shakespeare’s development of conflict between Brutus and Cassius throughout the play.
…show more content…
For example, in their tent and away from their soldiers, Brutus accuses Cassius of being greedy and taking bribes, similar to Lucius Pella. In response, Brutus explains that Cassius wrongs him by not giving him the gold coins he needs to pay his soldiers (IV. iii. 1-128). This clearly shows that Brutus with the abuse of power has become hypocritical and vain. Brutus disputes throughout the play that he is honorable, however he still needs Cassius’ money knowing that it would be taken immorally. This affects Julius Caesar as a whole because it illustrates Brutus’ greed and ignoble character that has been negatively affected by his authoritative position. Abraham Lincoln’s statement clearly demonstrates that the lens is true because it displays that once a person is given authority, their sense can become
In Roman history, some elite men held certain values that they felt strong enough to take their life in order to defend it. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, there are certain characters portrayed to show how a person’s values or ideas can change their behavior and influence some significant decisions. The protagonist of the play, Marcus Brutus, supports this thought by having an idealistic view on the world and by showing his patriotism toward Rome. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus as an honorable, idealistic man in order to show the depth that a high-class Roman man will go through in order to defend his honor.
Have you ever wondered if anything has stayed the same for over half a century? Look no further; in the drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, an important theme is all power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. This simple statement is true for Ancient Rome and it is also true for North Korea today.
Brutus's speech was ineffective in giving them reasons for Caesar's ambition. This gave Antony a large gap to turn the people against Brutus. Brutus told the people to believe him for his honor , and to respect him for his honor, so that they may believe. He is telling them to believe him for his honor and not for the reasons he gives. Brutus repeated many times that Caesar was ambitious but never once said how or why. This left the people with a question in their mind.
To start off, the character Brutus alienates from his indecisive, good hearted nature into a more powerful corrupted character who easily makes decisions that may not always be based off morality. For example, in the beginning of the play Brutus shows his good-hearted character when he states, "Nor construe any further [his] neglect than that poor Brutus with himself at war forgets the show of love to other men"(Shakespeare, 1.2.45-48). Clearly, before Brutus gained power he was unsure of himself, and still wasn’t against Caesar because his heart still pushed for moral choices. Furthermore, without power Brutus did not appear to be corrupted in anyway, and rather seems to want to do everything he can for the good of Rome. While it is true, that Brutus began as an innocent it is clear that further on in the play he began to be corrupted by power and this is seen when he states, "Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the head off and then hack the limbs, Like wrath in death and envy afterwards; For Antony is but a limb of Caesar" (Shakespeare, 2.1.162-165). Obviously, Brutus quickly becomes more confident and decisive in his decisions, and is even willing to tell the other conspirators what courses of action they must take. Therefore, further proving that as Brutus gains power his arrogance, and sense of control also increase.
Power is the ultimate goal of many throughout their life. If power is taken advantage of it
Brutus, Cassius, Caesar, and the other Senators held the power to do things others could not. With this authority came their ability to use poor judgement. In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar the theme Power Corrupts is arrayed thoroughly. Murder, treason, and ethical/moral corruption were three prevalent themes that proved the overall topic of Power Corrupts.
Cassius contrasts Brutus by being power hungry. It shows just how trustworthy Brutus is. The text states, “You yourself are much condemned to have an itching palm to sell and mart your offices for gold to under servers.” This shows how Cassius was taking bribes. The text also states, “That struck the foremost man of all this world but for supporting robbers.” This shows how Brutus is upset with Cassius taking bribes.
He states that Brutus is just as noble and worthy as Caesar. (Act 1, scene ii). He says that Brutus cannot see what everyone else does and recognize his worthiness. Cassius and the other senators do not want Caesar to be king because they would lose all their power. Cassius is slowly luring Brutus in to do his dirty work. He builds Brutus’s confidence up to make him thing that killing Caesar is the right thing to do. Cassius is basically playing with Brutus’s head because he knows Brutus will listen. So, Brutus joins the conspirators in killing Caesar. Cassius tells Brutus that it is for the good of Rome, and that he is saving them from a dictatorship. Cassius is going for Brutus’s weakest point, his care and concern for Rome. He knows that if Brutus believes the people distrust Caesar, then he will be convinced that Caesar must be thwarted. Brutus knew that if Caesar was crowned, he would never have a chance, and he was power hungry. This is what ultimately leads to the tragedy of Julius Caesar. After Brutus kills Caesar off, he starts to feel guilty for killing his friend, thus creating an internal conflict. Brutus was so confident that the plan would go exactly as planned that he fell apart when they encountered problems. If Brutus and the other conspirators had taken more time to think things through, they probably would have been more prepared for the situation that was handed to them.
Cassius and Brutus start to fight over the fact that Cassius is taking bribes. Brutus fights Cassius on this because in his mind this makes him a bad man because what Cassius is doing is against his moral code. “You have done that you should be sorry for. There is no terror, Cassius, in your threats; For I am armed so strong in honesty That they pass by me as the idle wind, Which I respect not. I did send to you For certain sums of gold, which you denied me; For I can raise no money by vile means. By heaven, I had rather coin my heart And drop my blood for drachmas” (4.2.65-73).
Brutus is an honorable man in this play but when Cassius, one of the main characters, and antagonists from the play, points out to Brutus why he
Act 1, Scene 2, Page 5). To the reader, it shows that Brutus cares about Rome more than anything. Nevertheless, according to E. Badian, Brutus was personally arrogant and cruel (“Marcus Junius Brutus”). Brutus took money from Asia, “turned the wealth into gold and silver coins.
Julius Caesar Julius Caesar was a powerful leader in 44 B.C, It was said that he gained too much power so he was assassinated by friends. No one knows the true story about Julius Caesar, but the author named William Shakespeare wrote his version of the tragedy of Julius Caesar showing how Caesar’s behavior might have been the cause of him being assassinated. In the story, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare showed that gaining too much power may bring harm in the end. In the story, Julius Caesar said “Let me have men about me that are fat, sleek headed-men.”
In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, many themes are developed. One character, Brutus, displays a significant theme that develops through the entire play. The theme that is supported most by this character is the idea that honor and respect are gained through performing works for the good of others instead of for personal gain.
Power is a natural desire for humans. It is what structures society, makes the world turn, and to get more of it, people will do almost anything. Yet society often follows whoever is in power without a second thought. Because the Romans follow whoever is in power without considering that person’s morals and ideals, they are responsible for the anarchy that ensues after Caesar’s death.
Shakespeare’s classic tragedy, Julius Caesar, is rife with meaning. So many themes abound in this play. Yet, of all of these, the most prominent theme is moral ambiguity. Early on, it is established that there are people who oppose Caesar, among them Brutus and his brother Cassius. Cassius strongly dislikes Caesar, whereas Brutus loves Caesar but is afraid of what will happen to Rome if he becomes king .