preview

Dangers Of Power In Julius Caesar

Decent Essays

The Dangers of Power

Abraham Lincoln once stated “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” A key term Lincoln uses in his statement is character, which means respectable and ethical qualities. In addition, Lincoln’s statement includes the term power which is defined as possession or control over others. Taken as a whole, Lincoln means that some people can overcome hardships but authority and power can cause their honor and ethics to change. Moreover, Lincoln implies in his statement that it is easy for the powerless to be gentle, however, power can alter one’s honor and morals. Finally, when looked under the lens of William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln’s statement can be proven valid through Shakespeare’s development of conflict between Brutus and Cassius throughout the play. …show more content…

For example, in their tent and away from their soldiers, Brutus accuses Cassius of being greedy and taking bribes, similar to Lucius Pella. In response, Brutus explains that Cassius wrongs him by not giving him the gold coins he needs to pay his soldiers (IV. iii. 1-128). This clearly shows that Brutus with the abuse of power has become hypocritical and vain. Brutus disputes throughout the play that he is honorable, however he still needs Cassius’ money knowing that it would be taken immorally. This affects Julius Caesar as a whole because it illustrates Brutus’ greed and ignoble character that has been negatively affected by his authoritative position. Abraham Lincoln’s statement clearly demonstrates that the lens is true because it displays that once a person is given authority, their sense can become

Get Access