Understanding The Bystander Effect

Better Essays

Introduction Every day, people encounter situations in which automatic thinking assists in decision making. How does automatic thinking cause humans to operate in different situations? In situations that are ambiguous, studies show that the bystander effect is shown to be more probable if these people were in a more controlled situation. The bystander effect shows that in situations in which there are more people present, the likelihood that someone will take action is far less than if one was alone. This is partially due to the belief that responsibility is split when there are more people present during a particular event. One is less likely to act because they expect that someone else will act first. Because everyone that is present in a particular event shares the same knowledge about the situation, they share the thought that someone else will act first, causing the shared responsibility to bounce from person to person as everyone waits for someone else to take action.
Differing Levels of Knowledge The first aspect of the bystander effect is the shared responsibility, but according to research by K. Thomas et. al (2016) a more important …show more content…

When there are less people in a situation, the bystander effect often fails to take place. This could be an example of common knowledge. If one person is aware that they are the only person with the information, they are more likely to take action. Another way to break the bystander effect is to make the situation more personal. One can do this by calling someone by their name, to break them out of the conformity mold of the situation. By breaking the bystander effect intentionally, one may be able to alter the behavior of others in the situation. Allowing others to lead one to conform is not ideal in numerous situations, which is why it is important to break the mold of conformity in the bystander

Get Access