The United States Drug Policy evolved after the 1900s when laws dictating drug abuse became prevalent. The targeted audience for the War on Drugs was aimed at helping the upper-class citizens and not the lower-class citizens which ultimately caused the government to become hypocrites. The United States War on Drug Policy was supposed to help America as a whole and not select classes. The supply of drugs entering into the United States did not seem to be affected after numerous different strategies were instilled by different presidents and government officials. Without a successful strategy to end the spread of drug usage we as a country have lost the War on Drugs. An unintended consequence from the United States drug policies to thwart drug …show more content…
The horrific increase of HIV/AIDS was one of many unintended consequences resulting from the United States Drug Policies to end drug use. Clinton’s decision to put the main emphasis of the policy toward law enforcement played a helping hand in the expansion of spreading HIV/AIDS. When increasing the presence of police on the street this started to drive up the cost of illegal drugs because more individuals were being put behind bars even though production did not increase in price. Majority of the drug abusers could not afford the price of the narcotics which lead them to become prostitutes or enact in criminal activities. The ramification of their actions contributed to the disperse of HIV/AIDS from unprotected sexual activities. A consequence that the United States did not intend on happening with the Drug Policy was drug producers and distributors adapting to interdiction and other tensions against their products. The drug addicts had to learn how to adapt to the change in drugs available to them just like their suppliers. When the United States “forces pushed hard against Afghan poppy-growers, farmers switched to marijuana.” The United States needed to realize that there are always substitutes and alternatives to drugs. Also, when the United States decided to emphasis the law enforcement presence in Miami and the Caribbean’s during the 1980s in hopes of ending the cocaine trade only caused the cocaine trade to relocate. When a drug supplier must relocate this gives them the opportunity to gain new clients and continue to spread narcotics undetected. Both of these consequences were not intended by the United States Drug Policy to end drug use but, occurred. Law enforcement was rushed, harsh, and unbearable which caused Americans to react in questionable ways. The United States Drug policy was an
As a major policy issue in the United States, the War on Drugs has been one of the most monumental failures on modern record. At a cost of billions of taxpayer dollars, thousands of lives lost and many thousands of others ruined by untreated addiction or incarceration, America's policy orientation concerning drug laws is due for reconsideration. Indeed, the very philosophical orientation of the War on Drugs and of the current drug policy in the United States has been one of prosecution and imprisonment rather than one of decriminalization, treatment and rehabilitation. As our medical and scientific communities characterize addiction as a disease, the United States government continues to characterize this disease as a crime. And in doing so, it has created an unnecessary criminal class in the United States. The research, supplemental political cartoons and proposed research will set out to prove that stiffer drug laws will only have the impact of criminalizing countless drug addicts who might otherwise benefit substantially from rehabilitation and other treatment-based strategies. With a specific focus on the prohibition of marijuana even for medical use, and using the Toulmin model for putting forth and completing the argument, the research will set out to demonstrate the irrational
According to Barbor et al(2010), it explains that there are 5 different types of interentions and strategies relevant to drug policy. And one of the main strategies that our society strongly focused on are laws and regulations and punitive(Barbor et al., 2010, pg. 101). Currently, Canada’s regulation places marijuana strictly illegal. Canada introduced the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act in 1995 to strictly criminalize possession and trafficking marijuana(Best Advice, 1997, pg. 2). Our current legislation of the Controlled Drgus and Substances Act possess some flexibility in terms of punishing drug users. First-time possession of marijuana under 30 grams is punishable with summary conviction of 1000 dollars fine or six months of imprisonment. For non-first time possession or possession over 30 grams is dealt more seriously. Possession for the purpose of trafficking, production and import or export of marijuana can be punishable by a maximum penalty of life imprsionment(Best
In this essay, federal drug policy, and its correlation with the shortage of drugs in Canada, will be considered. In particular, the disruption of drug supply will be considered, with a specific focus on drug supply within the province of Ontario. A discussion will ensue surrounding drug pricing and policy, and the ways in which these frameworks can ultimately serve to affect the efficacy of medical treatment and the safety of patients. Finally, the paper will focus on the accountability of multiple stakeholders, at both the federal and provincial levels, in terms of supplying medically necessary drugs to Canadians. This analysis will encompass the dominant role played by pharmaceutical actors in Canada. Finally, conclusions will be drawn
Each year, the President of the United States releases an updated version of the National Drug Control Strategy. The latest edition, from July of 2014, introduces a number of changes from previous years. The most important aspects of President Obama’s drug policy includes accepting those who do drugs as individuals who need help, and are the victim of a disease, rather than as criminals who are intentionally being menaces to society. This approach is very progressive, as there is a tradition in America to penalize those who have drug charges as though they are criminals, all while many people agree that money should be saved in this area. The idea that drug use is a victimless crime (of course, with the exception of violent drug-related crimes,
The “War on drugs” has shaped various aspects of public and criminal justice policy. The linkage between drug use and crime has been unaddressed problem over the past decades. New laws have been passed to deter drug involvement and increase penalties for drug related crime. The war on drugs has increase many court room dockets and higher incarceration rates. This war has caused a lot of disparity in communities because “Crack” was the poor man’s drug and due to the get tough tactics that the government was trying to enforce throughout this time cause the African American’s were hit harder with convictions due to the use of crack and causes more incarceration rates. Many would believe that the US has benefited from the war on drugs because our
The National Drug Control Policy was created by Obamas Administration and focuses on areas such as substance abuse, drugged driving, and prevention. Other areas it focuses on are healthcare, marijuana, and methamphetamine. There are good policies recommendations such as preventing drug use before it begins, allow treatment for millions of Americans, and take a smart on crime approach drug enforcement. The policy does have some issues such as using words like addict to push people away from wanting to receive help because they do not want that label. Another issue is incarceration people for drug use, even though the policy recommendation is to help these Americans receive services instead of jail time. The National Drug Control Policy seems
The United States of American is a society built upon principles and laws. These laws and principles were decided to keep Americans safe and help one another co-exist. In the beginning as laws came into being law makers would play it by ear as they decided what could remain legal for the public to take part in and what would be illegal and frowned upon by society. One of the many issues American government has come face to face with issues about making legal or illegal is drugs. Drugs since their first discovery has made a major impact in American history. Some might say that drugs have been destructive to our country, but even so legal or otherwise, one can say that they have contributed to the growth of our nation’s economy. The government
The U.S Drug War, it has been talked about greatly by politicians, and spoken about countless times in the news, however, the majority of people do not fully grasp the entirety of this subject, let alone its inner workings. Like the fact that this is not a recent issue, this war, which some people think has just been going on for the past few decades, actually started about a century ago. When people barely noticed the severity of the problem. Even now in the present, people still do not know the situation such as, how the current policies have not worked and the damage that has been done to the nation. The U.S. Government should rethink how it comes up with its drug policies.
Drug laws are made to protect us and the people. Alcohol was prohibited in the united states from 1920-1933. Some of the first drugs to be abused was the Hashish by the Islamic areas, and in more other countries like our own conducted the burning of cannabis fields. In the United States, the use and trade of drugs eventually caused the ‘War of Drugs’. Actions that the government has token towards solving that a problem is the laws we have today. Each law that is made for the public and leaders were develop to keep us safe. Congress and the three branches including the people and president in the United States all have part in the laws that are made for drug laws. Even with congress making most laws that are passed today with a three third overall vote. Originally in 1787 the leaders of
For the better part of half of a century, the American Government has waged war against its citizens through legislation, restriction, and imprisonment. This “war” against American citizens aptly named the “War on Drugs,” has cost billions of American taxpayer dollars and has not discontinued or even diminished the manufacture and sale of currently illegal substances, since once one drug smuggling operation is stopped, hundreds if not thousands of other illicit operations vie to fill their spot in the drug market. One argument would put forth that this is why we need to continue to enforce the War on Drugs or even apply it more heavily and put forth our best effort to arrest every operation that exists. Which rationally would be impossible
The drug culture that began with the use of marijuana then eventually into other more dangerous hallucinogenic such as heroine and cocaine began to merge into American society seamlessly in the late 1960’s. Due to the state of political unrest due to the Vietnam War and civil rights movement, initially the drug policy was loosely associated. It was not until 1982 when president Reagan declared the War on Drugs that the United States and other governments in the Americas took a serious stance on the topic. These policies have been very hypocritical in their approach, as they have still not achieved their implied goals. In actuality, the policies create more problems than they solve. They lead to negative healthy effects for their citizens, an
Currently, our federal government incorporates a U.S. framework that provides direction for social policy through, “The Principles of Modern Drug Policy” originated during three United Nations drug control conventions. The anecdotal results of which became a foundation for a global response to decrease the use of drugs and its adverse consequences. This framework identifies and describes the benefits of the National Drug Control policy, which the United States has committed to the following (Whitehouse.gov, 2015):
prevalent of national drug control regimes, and means a set of policies which establish criminal
Drugs have always played a role in our society from the present to the past they have been used for both medical uses and personal use. Though some drugs may help people who are suffering, for many they are misused and cause economic and social problems for our society. Because the negative effects of drug use not only affect the user but also many aspects of our society, drug control policies have been implemented throughout our history to try and control these issues. From the Harrison Act to the Prohibition in the 1930’s, to the 1970’s “War on Drugs,” the government has played an active role in controlling drug use, misuse, and the trafficking of drugs into our country because of the strains it brings to our economy. It harms the user,
Drugs, illegal and legal, have been a part of the history of the United States for almost three centuries. From the time when the 19th century began, Americans went from alcohol as the preferred mood altering substance to a new realm of addiction. During this time Americans were acquaint with wonder drugs such as morphine, heroin, and cocaine. Since that discovery, our society has confronted the problems of drug abuse and addiction (DEA, 2015). Once the 20th century began, the United States, contending with its first drug epidemic in the country’s short history, progressively started effective limitations to combat the epidemic. In the United States through internal law enforcement they began to fight the issue domestically. Through cooperation and sometimes without the United States began spearheading a world crusade to limit opium and coca crops (DEA, 2015). By World War II, the use of drugs in America had declined significantly enough for it to no longer be considered a significant issue. It was then seen as a borderline social problem and pushed