Table of Contents
2 OBJECTIVE 2
3 BACKGROUND 2
4 CONVEX OPTIMIZATION 2
4.1 INTRODUCTION 2
4.2 THEORY 2
4.3 ALGORITHM 2
5 NON CONVEX OPTIMIZATION 2
5.1 INTRODUCTION 2
5.2 THEORY 2
5.3 ALGORITHM 2
6 LAGRANGIAN RELAXATION FLOW CHART 2
6.1 INTRODUCTION 2
6.2 ALGORITHM FOR A UNIT COMMITMENT PROBLEM 2
7 RESULTS AND SIMULATIONS 2
7.1 TEST SYSTEM 2
7.2 RESULTS 2
8 CONCLUSIONS 2
9 FUTURE SCOPE 3
10 REFERENCES 3
OBJECTIVE
BACKGROUND
CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
ALGORITHM
NON CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
INTRODUCTION
THEORY
ALGORITHM
LAGRANGIAN RELAXATION FLOW CHART
INTRODUCTION
Using a Dynamic Programming method would be a tedious search of all the the possible combinations. This reduction in possible combinations would make the problem complicated and would consume a greater amount of time. This problem of reducing combinations can be eliminated by using Lagrangian relaxation method.
The Lagrangian Relaxation algorithm being implemented in basically an extension of Non - Convex Optimization to a power system. In this project, we have taken up the cost functions of each of the generators under consideration and developed the cost function to be minimized keeping the mind the generator limits as well as the load balance.
Loading constraints: Pt_load=∑_(i=1)^Ng▒〖Pit*Uit=0 〗 Generating limits: Uit*Pit_min≤Pit≤Uit*Pit_max
The objective function to be minimized i.e, the overall cost function of the generator would be the sum of cost function of each
A primary objective in measuring productivity is to improve operations either by using fewer inputs to produce the same output, or to produce:
These three approaches have all their advantages and disadvantages and allow a great number of combinations. Our idea is to implement a three-step solution.
Design an algorithm in pseudocode to solve the problem. Make sure to include steps to get each input and to report each output.
The above three models will be used to solve the facility location problems for three emergency scenarios (i.e. K=3).
In the fig1 represents the number of nodes varying with respect to the delay as compared with MILP optimal formulation. It explained our proposed algorithm is better than the MILP formulation.
In order to test the effectiveness of IGA and GA when solving the timetabling problem, a comparison with the PSO algorithm was performed to investigate trends of performance. All coding was written in MATLAB code and the test case focused on the three above algorithms. All tests were executed on a 3.30 Ghz Intel core i5 processor with 16 GB of ram. The convergence graphs for IGA, GA, and PSO below shows progress until a valid solution for each of the algorithms were discovered. Each of the algorithms simulated 1,000 generations. The graph in Figure 10 - 14 provides a comparison of the proposed algorithm with the conventional population operator based algorithm.
The aim of algorithm C is to find such an optimum for reduced power consumption. To reduce complexity, we will only try to find to minimize the dynamic power dissipated as a result of the computation.
Thus, this method will speed up the calculation process and reduce a lot of work that we are supposed to go through. However, the bisection method and the Newton-Raphson method are very important programming to solve the problems in the engineering job. Moreover, the Gauss-Seidel method has many advantages as well since this method is very popular in solving problems that have many unknown variables or integers. Even though this type of method is a bit complicated; however, its benefits are very
14) Consider the following transshipment problem. The shipping cost per unit between nodes 1 and 2 is $10, while the shipping cost per unit between nodes 2 and 3 is $12. What is the objective function?
Alex Rogo was tasked with a very difficult job by his superior, Mr. Peach. He had to get the production plant efficient and profitable or it would be closed in three months due to poor results. Lucky for Alex, he enlisted the help of his old physics professor, Jonah. Through Jonah’s advice to Alex, we are able to see the different methods used under the theory of constraints.
12) Suppose that we force the production of one unit of product A. The new objective function value will be
A linear formula idea will be used and the decision variables will be labeled as follow:
The objective function, decision variables and constraints are fed into solver to arrive at the optimal solution as shown in the below screenshot
PART A – Linear Programming 1 a) Linear Programing Model Decision Variables: Let x = acres of watermelon Let y = acres of cantaloupe Objective Function: Maximize Z = 390x + 1300y – 5(20x + 15y) + 5(2x + 2.5y) = 270x + 300y – 100x + 75y + 10x + 12.5y = 256x + 284.5y where Z = total profit 390x = profit from watermelons 1300y = profit from cantaloupe 5(20x + 15y) = cost of fertilizer 5(2x + 2.5y) = cost of labour Identification of Constants: Maximize Z = 256x + 284.5y
d) The opportunity cost should be calculated as the resource cost of producing the input.