If I had to grade this book I would give it a C-, because the book can be very hard to follow. Each chapter is a small little story that are scary, but they only have one thing in common to connect all the chapters, which is the villain of the story, Victor Frankenstien. Each chapter is a small little story that ties into a bigger picture but the reader would only think that its just a bunch of short stories. The beginning of the book just ruins the book because it makes the reader very confused because you have to pay very close attention to realize that certain things were conected. until the end of the book where more things start to make sense, but by that time the reader has most likely given up. Within the first few chapters the jumped between monks and the Frankenstien monster, to mind control and clones taking over to undercover cops taking down a murderer. It is very hard to follow and you don’t understand what the author is trying to do until you get further in the book when Victor Frankenstien comes into the picture. “’I refer to my maker, not yours.’ ‘Victor Frankenstiean?’ That name seemed to echo across the vaulted …show more content…
I was personally so confused and didn’t know what was going on over half of the time. I find it that if I was that confused any other reader would be just as confused and most likely have given up on the book. I feel like the author should have connected the chapter better so that the About 20 chapters into it more things are connected and some of the same characters are being used and continuing the story, so now it is easier for the reader to follow the book along. “’Don’t I sound like Erika?’ ‘Your voice is strange’” (Koontz 112). This shows that the mind control and clones are back from the first chapter. Erika was also a character that had showed up in previous chapters and now is more consistently showing
I rate this book a 9/10. It was so amazing and I learned so much from this novel. I definitely recommend this book because it really opens your eyes to the troubles of this world, and families who are breaking apart. The reason why I didn’t give it a perfect score was because, at times I would get confused by the dialogue because the author didn’t fully write who was talking in a conversation. Other than that, it was a heartbreaking story that gave me a bigger perspective of this
In my opinion I thought that this book was a very good book. In this chapter I will describe the setting, theme, plot and conflict etc. This book had a few different settings like
In my personal opinion, this book was very hard to read and follow. At certain times I had a hard time figuring out who was talking in the book. I really wanted to enjoy this book and it’s “case studies” but I simply could not get past the confusion and enjoy this like I would any other book. I feel like the author wrote a lot of the situations for shock
Abdomen: The lipases appeared unremarkable. The liver, spleen, gallbladder adrenals, kidneys, pancreas and abdominal aorta appeared unremarkable. The bowels seen on the study appeared thickened. Dilated appendix seemed consistent with acute appendicitis. All the structures of the abdomen appeared unremarkable. No free air was seen.
I’d like to build on what I was saying about understanding the book, when I read it especially in certain chapters when something big happened, I could predict what was going to happen. This was a really intense book but after the theme I could understand it.
I skipped ahead in you book in class all the time i couldn't help but continue on with reading some parts were funny and some were sad to me the book revolved around rob and his feelings my best hope while reading was that rob would open up and finally be able to talk to his dad after finishing
I think that this work is a very well put together book. Even though In the earlier questions I make it sound like a ten on ten this book is not. I rate this book a 9/10 for the soul reason that it was on a very directed path and you could the events that were going to happen before they did by just reading the book. Even the twist that the author put in were not that book which made some of the book predictable and who really wants a book in which they know everything that is going to happen.
Howard Cosell, a legendary commentator, spoke words about this legendary man that more or less sums up his legendary career. He said "Frank Sinatra, who has the phrasing, who has the control, who understands the composers, who knows what losing means as so many have, who made the great comeback, who stands still, enduringly, on top of the entertainment world. Ladies and gentlemen, from here on in it's Frank Sinatra!" Frank Sinatra, the only singer in history to have hit records in five consecutive decades, led a lot more distinctive life than people were led to believe.
Another interesting feature of Walden University is their focus on "student-centeredness"--which means that the university seeks to build their curriculum around the work ethic of the students. Students are expected to be self-motivated and are rarely reminded of an upcoming assignments or tests. For some, this may sound like an excuse for professors to be disinterested. For others, especially self-driven individuals, not having a professor breathing down your neck may be a breath of fresh air.
Overall, this book is a really deep thinking book, I haven't fully understand what the author is trying to teach us, but I love this process of stretching my
This book combines characteristics of a suspense thriller with those of a tragedy and is a very interesting book to read. I liked the detail that the author went into about the psychological aspects of the characters in making the decisions that they made. I thought that the characters were well developed and I liked the detail that the author went into about the settings. A detailed setting can really increase the intensity and realism of a situation in a book. This book contained some difficult words that lower level readers might not understand. I would recommend that anyone looking for a suspense/tragedy oriented book should look to this one. The beginning is a somewhat tedious read, but that is only because the author takes so much time to develop the
Do you know the real history of Frankenstien? Well I do, and now i'm here to tell you about it. In the history of Frankenstien, we learn about the evolution of the monster. He is thought to have come from a german ledgand, has many unkown ancestors,has many different ideas on looks, and is know for his iconic apperance in the Halloween season. In this essay, we will be talking about how he came to be. Also how the book and the movie compare to eachother.
Already I can tell that this book is more difficult than most other novels I have read. It seems as though Roth is in favor of using long sentences and complex vocabulary. I sometimes had to reread sentences a few times because there was difficult vocabulary I needed to look up and the sentences were long. I needed to read each sentence piece by piece to make sure I could understand what the author wanted to convey to the reader. Although the text seemed overwhelming when I read the first few pages; once I began reading sentences in increments I could more easily understand the text.
Holt Renfrew, is high-end retail chain for designer fashions and cosmetics that imports their products from Europe, Asia and USA. They are facing some challenges regarding the size of their current warehouse and inventory levels. The warehouse is not big enough to accommodate all their inventory and as such goods are always scattered everywhere. They are also
Alphonse Bertillon was the first to truly create the scientific method of criminal identification. Born in 1853, Bertillon was from Paris France and came from a family of scientific background. His father, Dr. Louis Adolphe Bertillon, was a distinguished physician, statistician, and the vice president of the Anthropological society of Paris. Bertillon’s grandfather was also a well known naturalist and mathematician. (Ashbaugh, 1999).