Vygotsky, Zone Of Proximal Development

The first example that shows the socialization of Vygotsky’s theory is learning to ride a bike. Most children in our neighborhood ride their bicycles without training wheels. However, my son who is five was still using his bike that had the training wheels but wanted to take them off to be like the other kids. This is connected to the cognitive theory by my child knowing the motor skills to use to ride a bike but having to still use the training wheels to ride his bike. For him to accomplish his goal he needed the zone of proximal development approach and the use of the scaffolding technique. As his father, I have experience riding bikes and know that he and the basic understanding of how to ride a bike but need more information and tools to move more toward independency when riding his bicycle. I provided my son with more knowledge that would help him ride his “big boy” by telling him to always keep pedaling and to keep the handles straight so he avoids

Vygotsky defines the zone of proximal development as ‘the distance between the actual developmental level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers’. (https://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html)

In Vygotsky’s concept, zone of proximal development he explains that it is the distance between a child’s developmental level, which is determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance (Vygotsky, 1978, p174). This concept is highly used in education and in classrooms. For example, I work with a student who is eighteen years of age and has intellectual disabilities. During our morning routine he enjoys working on puzzles. He has a difficult time putting the puzzle together so I help him with clues and or prompt him to the puzzle piece that fits. He moves onto a new puzzle once I no longer have to give him clues or prompts. As I have tracked his progress he has needed less prompt than he did three months ago. The goal of this concept is that, as an adult collaborates with a child to help them move from where they are to where they should be with help by accomplishing the exercise through prompts, clues, modeling, and etc.

Lev Vygotsky believed that social and cognitive development work simultaneously to build and evolve on one another. He believed that social, cultural and personal experience cannot be detached from each other and many things influence the way children learn and develop, not just their own experiences, thus Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory. Vygotsky’s ideas were and remain controversial as he had no specific training in psychology or children’s development. His preeminent contribution to children’s development is his recognition of the value of progressing knowledge by means of interaction with educators, peers and family (Mooney, 2000, p. 83). The major ideas of Vygotsky’s theory are scaffolding and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Scaffolding is a process Vygotsky described as the framework or temporary support for children’s learning. In order for scaffolding to be beneficial, it must be responsive to the child’s needs (Coon & Mitterer, 2013, pp. 106-107).

Vygotsky defined the zone of proximal development as the distance between a person’s actual developmental level and the higher level of potential development.

In this domain Piaget stated that the child who is still in the preoperational stage can’t conceptualize abstractly and needs concrete physical situations. They can’t mentally manipulate information. The child is able to form stable concepts as well as magical beliefs and their thinking is still egocentric, which means that the child has difficulty seeing the viewpoint of others. Piaget split this stage into the symbolic and intuitive thought substage. In the symbolic function stage children are able to understand, represent, remember, and picture objects in their mind without having the object in front of them. Vygotsky stated that children learn cognitive tasks through their interactions with older peers and adults. Not only do younger children watch and imitate older people or peers as they complete tasks, but these older guides also help younger children accomplish tasks they couldn’t accomplish on their own. He calls this the zone of proximal development which he describes what children can do alone and what they can do with assistance. Another theorist named Bandura coined the term observational learning which means people learn appropriate social behaviors by observing and modeling others. This type of learning is most effective during childhood. Vygotsky believed that the important part of the cognitive development is language. He observed that very young

 zone of proximal development. To reach the target that child need lots of help and not steps which are to big as this could knock there confidence. Another stage Vygotsky has is ‘the importance of play’ he believed that play provides essential skills to improve their social, personal, and professional activates. This means that children can play and do things beyond what they can do in real life- such as play mums and dads, pretend to drive a car. Though play they talk to each other and pretend they are in a different world with only their friends. Play is another way they can reach the zone of proximal development. Reconstruction is another stage which means child experience the same situation again and again as they grow up. Each time they have this experience they can deal with it at a higher level. This means

This can be linked to Vygotsky’s (1978) (cited in Nevid 2007) theory of Zone of Proximal Development. The Zone of Proximal Development is closely linked to scaffolding. Vygotsky sees the Zone of Proximal Development as the area where the child needs the most guidance. He looks at the interaction of peers as a great way of developing skills. The Zone of Proximal Development provides support for the learner’s development. According to (Nevid 2007) the followers of Vygotsky believe that parents and practitioners should use the skill of scaffolding in order to support children when they are gaining new

171).” This, in other words, is when a child cannot completely perform a task independently but can do it with a bit of assistance from a more competent figure. This zone of proximal development is something I experience with Blair. At two years old she has got to pick out her tooth and hairbrush, but she still needs a bit of help with both operations. Another idea that Vygotsky believed in was the method of scaffolding. This is known as the support for learning and problem solving that encourages independence and growth (Feldman 2012). For example, sometimes Blair has a tough time communicating using her words. I often encourage conversation by asking questions that instigate more of a response from Blair. This helps her grow in her communication and is good practice for her. Cognitive development was viewed by Vygotsky as the product of social interactions. He focused on the social aspects of development and learning instead of concentrating on individual performance.

As mentioned previously, children have lesser developed fine motor skills. While Ms. Nancy’s activity would assist in this aspect, completing the task for 90 minutes would strain the children hands and cause aches. Additionally the work produced would be of a poor standard due to their inability to manipulate the muscles in their hand. Implementing a mock “scaffolding” system (Vygotsky, anna wolfolk) that allows the student to complete less precise fine motor skills and strengthening their muscles, then gradually increasing the details and precision required to complete greater detail orientated tasks, would develop their fine motor skills. While this does not directly align with Vygotskys theory which revolves around social interaction, it does allow for the assessment and implementation of individualised gradual development to reach the Zone of Proximal Development where the student can master the task with minimal assistance and guidance. Using activities such as threading pasta onto string, Playdoh activities and lego would increase these skills be developmentally appropriate and prepares them for completing an activity that involves more

He studied children and found that while children can learn new concepts well on their own, adults and peers can be useful in helping children achieve new learning that would not be possible without instruction. The difference between the most difficult task a child can do completely independently and the most difficult task they can do with instruction is known as the ZPD (Cronin & Mandich: 2015). When Max walked out of the room and walked over to the potty chair, he was in Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. He showed he can go to the potty on his own, but still requires assistance with wiping. Toilet training is the “difficult task”. Therefore, Max is potty training independently but still needs help with wiping. Therefore, his parents are required to help, which is part of scaffolding his learning process. Scaffolding is level of assistance needed to accomplish a certain task. Toilet training is a big leap in development, so scaffolding allows Max plenty of time to successfully learn each step in the process. Max can regress at some point and try to cling to his infancy. Instead of expressing frustration with the regression, children must be allowed to regress as this is an important part of the process. Max will succeed, but it is important he does it on his own terms and is not forced(Cronin & Mandich:

Vygotsky breaks the difficulty level of the task being performed by the child into three levels of difficulty and the amount of assistance needed. The first stage is the lowest level of difficulty where no assistance is needed from an external influence. The task that the child is trying to perform is easy enough that he or she can perform it on their own individually. In this stage, there is little intellectual development or knowledge obtained. The third stage is the highest level of difficulty where a child cannot execute a task because it is too difficult. This stage requires complete assistance from a parent or teacher to execute the task for the child. The middle stage is key to intellectual development and to Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory.

The second component in the sociocultural theory is the zone of proximal development (ZPD). Vygotsky believed that any training creates learning processes that lead to development and this system results in zones of proximal development. It's the thought that a child completes a task that he/she cannot do alone, with the help from a more experienced person. Vygotsky also described the ZPD as the difference between the actual development level as determined by individual problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or collaboration with more experienced peers. The result of this process is children become more socialized in the dominant culture and it encourages cognitive development.

The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) is the best known Vygotskian concept. To successfully apply it in a classroom, it is important to know not only where a child is functioning now and where that child will be tomorrow, but also how best to assist that child in mastering more advanced skills and concepts.

Lev Vygotsky was an educator and a theorist known primarily for his sociocultural theory. Vygotsky developed the sociocultural theory, which is the theory of human development through social and cultural influences (Aimin, 2013), during the 1920’s-30’s. One of Vygotsky’s focuses was the concept of the zone of proximal development (ZPD), which is the idea of a child being appropriately challenged, this will be discussed further on. His theory stemmed from how children’s learning is impacted greatly through guidance of peers, cultural relations (language), social interactions, teachers and any other adult figure in their environment. In the last 10-15 years, teachers, caregivers, and educators have been attending more to Vygotsky’s theory and his concept of the zone of proximal development, because his work impacts how children learn in their optimal environment (Trawick-Smith, 2015). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory will be discussed through historical insight, explanation of the theory itself, how sociocultural and society relate to each other, and how the theory is applied in the educational society.