The Romans had a long rule from 27 BC to when the East and West decided to split for separate rule in 395 AD. The Western Roman Empire met a dramatic end by the year 476 AD. Whereas the Eastern Roman Empire more formally referred to as the “Byzantine Empire” had a successful long rule until their heartbreaking defeat after the loss of their heart City Constantinople. The Romans were as of gods during their rule. They had a significantly long rule, about a 1500 year long rule behind them and their army. However, all good things must come to an end, the Byzantine empire had come to a halt after the crushing defeat during the siege of Constantinople led by Sultan Mehmet 2. Even Though the Byzantine Empire was weak for quite some time how responsible was Sultan Mehmet 2 for the fall of the Byzantine Empire. With Constantinople being the last standing hope for the Byzantine Empire Mehmet saw this as a perfect opportunity to take control of it and bring an end to the Byzantine Empire thus making him the main the main factor on why …show more content…
However, the Byzantines had exhausted their resources and thrown themselves into that compromisable position.
The Byzantines could be held partly accountable for their own defeat. When the Romans split between East and West the Western Roman Empire had established a government whereas the Eastern Roman Empire had not which could be one of the reasons why the Byzantines had lost Constantinople due to improper authority. However, some could argue that the reason they had ruled significantly longer than the Western Roman Empire was because the Western Empire had such a poor government whereas the Byzantines had relied solely on religion to keep them fighting for what they felt was right. While
The second way the Byzantine empire was successful was by the way they consolidated power. The way they took control was by conquering and making the people in the region copy their beliefs. For example, from 533-534 the “Conquest of North Africa.” Was when they conquered most of the land in North Africa and made to adapt their beliefs. Another example of a way they consolidated power was when they had a “War with the Sassanid Empire”.
The second way the Byzantine empire was successful was by the way they consolidated power. The way they took control was by conquering and making the people in the region copy their beliefs. For example, from 533-534 the “Conquest of North Africa.” Was when they conquered most of the land in North Africa and made to adapt their beliefs. Another example of a way they consolidated power was when they had a “War with the Sassanid Empire”.
In 1054 the Byzantines split from the Roman Catholic Church in the west and developed the Eastern Orthodox Church. They prospered for almost a thousand years, but fell to the Turks in 1453. Byzantine history is often over looked, but there are many reasons they should be taught about in classrooms including their advanced military technology, the development and influence of Justinian’s code,
Imagine, being a citizen of the greatest part of the Roman empire. Your society had a set system that worked and kept the Byzantine Empire going. Then you hear rumors and whispers about how the west is going more and more downhill and you stop to look at what your side has. The Byzantine Empire had rules, set to help people and make it equal for all, they had a church that was very successful with a good message, and smart people in the government who were very ahead of their time. Let's deep dive into why and how the Byzantine Empire survived.
The Byzantine Empire built upon ideals that had influenced the late Roman Empire, therefore influencing cultural and political elements within the new empire with touches of Roman value. The government of the Byzantine Empire was based off of the Roman law with values of Christianity incorporated into it. By using the Roman law as a foundation, the Byzantine Empire built up their government into a more centralized position by combining the church and state. Byzantium also tried bring back the ruling lands that Rome had the greatest influence on, through the rule of Constantine. Although that didn’t last as long, the conquests proved that Roman influence still was great within the empire but faulty everywhere else.
After the fall of Rome, the Eastern Roman Empire survived and eventually became known as the Byzantine Empire. As a center of trade, it lasted for over 1,000 years. The Byzantines’ government made laws to keep its citizens safe and in order. Furthermore, several documents revealed that the imperial government of the Byzantine Empire was involved financially in the private and religious lives of its citizens.
Comparing and contrasting the society of the early medieval Western Empire with that of the Byzantine Empire. The Western Empire and The Byzantine Empire were originally part of the Roman Empire. By the Middle Ages both Empires were vastly different, though they shared common traits. The Western Empire and the Byzantine Empire had very different government structures. The Byzantine Empire was ruled by an Emperor but alternatively to direct rule, the Byzantine used civil service to effectively run the empire. The Western Empire was ruled by a Holy king. The Byzantine Empire had a continuous tradition of emperors reaching back to the east and west split of Roman Empire. The last western emperor was Romulus Augustulus, who abdicated in 476. Three
Following the decline of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE, a new empire rose up in the ashes. This new empire, the Byzantine Empire, was a culmination of Western Roman cultures and tradition, yet, it also contains many distinctive features. Originating from the same empire, the two empires display similar cultural roots.
As the Roman Empire began to fall, it was split into Eastern and Western sections. The emperor at the time, Constantine, declared that the new imperial residence, Byzantium, would become the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire. After experiencing economic issues and invasions from the Huns, the Western part of the Roman Empire finally collapsed in 476. With a wealthy, strong, and prosperous capital, the eastern half of the Roman Empire survived and became known as the Byzantine Empire. This wealth and stability allowed for significant achievements to be made.
The Byzantine Empire followed the Roman Empire, and it, also, seems meager in comparison. It had evolved from the Roman Empire, and because it was in the late stage that it was in, land had been lost, so in terms of size, the Roman Empire was superior to the Byzantine. The empire wasn t strong, either. At the start, the first ruler, Justinian, attempted to reconquer Roman lands, but in doing so, left his own land in ruins, and his conquests were lost right after his death. The Empire faced many enemies and was threatened constantly by them. Eventually, all land was lost except for the Constantinople, the rich and powerful capital city, and the land surrounding it.
Since its collapse, historians have attempted to explain the struggle for power and control over both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire that followed. To explain the complexities of the Roman Republic, the Empire, and their political complexities can be a daunting task. For nearly ten centuries Rome would rule most of the known world before the fall of the Western Empire (Byzantine) in 476 C.E. Before that fall occurred, a fundamental change would take place that would transform the original Republic into the Roman Empire. Many factors would be directly and indirectly responsible for this transition. These would
Due to a stable government and a properly managed economy, the Byzantine Empire was able to last for quite a while. Emperors used their power correctly and there was a centralized government that helped keep the empire functioning even during rough times. Constantinople’s bureaucracy made sure everything ran smoothly. They regulated prices and wages, had systems for licensing, controlled the trade, oversaw schools, churches, observation of holidays, and even controlled the military and courts. The