Was Socrates Dangerous

Comparative Analysis on Socrates Argument.” Arrogant is the best term to describe Socrates. Socrates was over-critical of others, and too fixated on his own philosophical prowess to care about the consequences his actions may have produced. As well as Socrates had the qualities of a man who saw no error in what he was doing because he thought he was above average men, and thought he was a benefit to society against what others claimed. These examples of Socrates’ character are understood

Socrates is known to be a great philosopher in Greece, who’s teaching has been giving great impact in today’s world. Socrates throughout his life has been teaching in Athens, unbothered. At the age of seventy, he was put on trial and executed by Athens. A lot of factors influenced his trial in 399 BCE. It still raises the same question as to what really happened and why was Socrates sent to trial at such a late age in life. First, cultural factors are some factors that influenced his trial in Athens

were subtle in their language and their reasoning was often filled with fallacies. The Sophists were rhetoricians; speakers and orators concerned with winning the hearts and ears of their people, much like a politician. Plato (427-347 B.C.) deals greatly with the ideas of sophists in his writings, particularly Gorgias, Protagoras and The Republic, through the idealized character Socrates. Plato was not a Sophist, nor was he a rhetorician. He was a logistician and geometer, concerned, not with persuasion

I do agree with Socrates that rhetoric is mostly misused and dangerous for both the speaker and the listener. I believe rhetoric is dangerous for the speaker because that person maybe don’t understand how much power they hold over someone. It can be dangerous for the listener for the simply fact is the information they’ve been give may or may not be correct. I think past experience motivated Socrates feel this way about the usage of rhetoric. One example that Socrates proves that rhetoric

Philosophy Socrates a sophist? Or just sophisticated? Plato goes a long way in attempting to distinguish Socrates from the likes of Protagoras, a self admitted sophist. In Protagoras, Socrates is depicted as a street smart, wisdom dispensing young man, brash with confidence and a bit of arrogance that goes a long way when confronted with the old school rhetoric of Protagoras. Plato begins to separate the two at the hip right from the get go. The dialogue between Socrates and his inquisitive friend

Socrates explains to Phaedrus that “the most ambitious politicians love speechwriting and long for their writings to survive” after Phaedrus states that most politicians are afraid of making speeches for the fear of being called sophists. Socrates challenges Phaedrus’ belief of the sophistic view of rhetoric. Socrates goes against this argument of persuasion being the most important than the truth in a speech

Plato’s Five Dialogues, Socrates, an elderly man living in the city of Athens, questions these religious ideas to further his understanding of religion and how thousands of people are able to connect with unidentified and personified spirits. Socrates prolongs his skepticism as he explores the idea of piety and encounters a number of religious experts who end up displaying more hypocrisy and falsehood than wisdom and maturity. Since questioning or denying the belief of the gods was a crime during the

to think critically and to think for themselves. Socrates was in no way conventional and was widely known for pushing buttons of the people of Athens who thought they knew what they were talking about. While pushing these people to think in a different manner, he was showing them that they don’t know as much as they thought they knew by asking simple questions

Socrates’ Trial Defense in Terms of His Values In his Apology, Plato recounted the trial that led to the execution of his friend and mentor, Socrates. The account revealed that values of Socrates’ accusers and his own fundamentally differed, and that they had been angered because he tried to prove that they had misplaced theirs. Those differences created conflict between the two parties that culminated in his trial. With the understanding that a jury condemned Socrates to death

there are few that break this barrier and realize that they actually know nothing because they are forever learning. Such as Socrates in the dialogue Apology by Plato, Plato analyzes Socrates journey to disprove his wisdom by questioning the most respected and talented people in Athens. Through ethos and paradox Plato reveals a respectful tone for his mentor Socrates. Socrates makes himself more credible when he exposes his ethos to the audience. He states that he has the god of Delphi, Chaerephon