preview

Was The Reign Of Terror Justified Dbq Analysis

Decent Essays

To begin, was The Reign of Terror justified? Does a bear poop in the woods? Yes. The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years, from the execution of Louis XVI in January 1793 to late July 1794. During those eighteen months, more than 20,000 French people were put to death by guillotine. Furthermore, although some of the actions that occurred were not satisfactory, I have reason to believe that there's more information to backup my claim, that it was justified. The Reign of Terror was justified. This claim can be supported by three reasons: Document C, They were opposed by outside foreign invaders; it was challenged from the inside by rebels and émigrés. Document F No one is trying to stop it. The Reign of Terror was key for having people approval, it shows it in Document F. Lastly, Document A, states that laws of people and what they allowed to do. …show more content…

This document is justified because France was at a low point, they would under seige and couldn't defend themselves. A change was necessary, they would have fallen. "In August 1792. an 80,000-man army marched into France." France was challenged from the outside by foreign invaders. They couldn't stand there and be penetrated by enemy firepower, they has to make a movement that would hurt, but benefit in the long run greatly. Moreover, In Document C it states that in September 1792 France fought back and won three Famous Battle of Valmy. It is stated that 80,000 people died in both sides. Imagine if France did not fight back, France would be in shambles. Additionally, rebellion broke out in France with was horrible for France. They had internal and external conflict. They had to do something about it, that something was The Reign of Terror. This evidence show that the Reign of Terror was justified because they were in need of desperate measure, or else everyone would perish. The Reign of Terror was a good

Get Access