[pic]
[pic]
HOMEWORK OF IBM
FDI MOTIVES
ASSOC.PROF. Mahmut Arslan
PREPARED BY:
FEYZA KAYA 20312196
ZÜLFÜYE YILDIZ 20212354
CONTENTS
[pic] i
CONTENTS ii
FDI MOTIVES 3 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: 3 Types of FDI 4 Advantages of FDI 4 Motivations for FDI 6 Market-Expansion: Investments versus Trade 6 Resource-Acquisition Investment 8 Diversification-Oriented Investments 9 Political Motives 9
SOME EXAMPLES FOR FDI MOTIVES 9 Case: Bridgestone Tire Company 9 Foreign direct investment: a case study on Argentina 10 Case of Ireland 11 Case of Singopare: Foreign Direct Investment 13 Case of Mexico: Foreign Direct Investment 15 FDI MOTIVES IN TURKEY 18 THE
…show more content…
FDI has a lot of benefits to home ad host country. These are in the following:
Advantages of FDI
Businesses and governments are motivated to engage in FDI in order to expand sales, acquire resources and minimize competitive risk. Governments may additionally be motivated by some desired political advantage.
Sales expansion objectives :
- Overcome high transportation costs
- Lack of domestic capacity
- Low gains from scale economies
- Trade restrictions
- Barriers because of country-origin effects (nationalism, product image, delivery risk)
- Lower production costs abroad
Resource acquisition objectives :
- Savings through vertical integration
- Savings through rationalized production
- Gain access to cheaper or different resources and knowledge
- Need for lower costs as product mature
- Gain governmental investment incentives
Risk minimization objectives :
- Diversification of customer base (same motivations as for sales expansion objectives)
- Diversification of supplier base (same motivations as for resource acquisition objectives)
- Following customers
- Preventing competitors ' advantage
Political objectives :
-Influence companies usually through factors under resource acquisition objectives.
And the benefits of FDI to Home and Host Country.
FDI Benefits
Host Country ■ Resource transfer effects ■ Supplying capital, technology & management resources ■ Employment effects ■ Brings jobs
Countries would participate in foreign direct investments because it helps in the economic development of the country where the investment is being made. They also engage in FDI to reduce production costs.
As well as the direct impact on employment and wider economic benefits of FDI as follows:
Ajami and BarNiv (1984) attempted to explain the variability of FDI across countries. They emphasized in following determinants of FDI in US: relative size of the US market, change in exports to the US, growth of GNP in the home and host countries, decline in value of the US dollar during the late 1970s, inflation rates in the home and host countries, attractiveness of the US capital markets and research and development and manufacturing as a percent of GNP.
FDI allows the home country to invest into the host country to produce, advertise, and distribute products, in order to upsurge their market share and provides a long-term investment and enhancement. (Moosa, 2002)
By definition, an FDI is an “investment that involves some ownership and/or operating control. The foreign residents are usually multinational corporations (MNCs)” (Cohn 412).
The effects can be negative or positive. According to the theory of Hill (2003), FDI can affect host countries on resources-transfer effects, employment, competition and product and process innovation. There are a small number of research available that explain the behaviour of local companies when FDI take place. Nevertheless, there are many research that explain the benefits for the local economy. Foreign direct investment can increased indirect productivity for host country companies through the realization of external economies. Generally these benefits indicates the importance of the way in which the influence is transmitted that referred as “spillovers” (BlomstrOrn,
FDI is thought to bring certain benefits to national economies. It can contribute to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Gross Fixed Capital Formation (total investment in a host economy) and balance of payments. There have been empirical studies indicating a positive link between higher GDP and FDI inflows (OECD a.), however the link does not hold for all regions, e.g. over the last ten years FDI has increased in Central Europe whilst GDP has dropped. FDI can also contribute toward debt servicing repayments, stimulate export markets and produce foreign exchange revenue.
FDI in a developing economy means the development of the entire national economy on a grand scale, benefiting several other support industries, development of the country 's infrastructure, raising standards of living and increasing per capita income. World-leading manufacturers on
The Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): is to invest and build new business in other country (Wild, 2015 ). OECD defines FDI as a key factor of enhancing and promoting the development of economy and stability of the country in the political and financial sector to improve the society as a whole (OECD , 20). Moreover, The UNCTAD explains the FDI by mentioning it as a relationship between two companies which means one company is going to do business in the other company as an investment (UNCTAD, 2007). It is making a new business, investment or company in a foreign country.
that the reliant variable is affirmatively altered by commercial factors. Saltz (1992) examined the result of FDI on commercial development for the third globe countries. His explanations concur alongside those of Bos, Sanders and Secchi (1974), that the level of output of a host state will stagnate in cases of FDI whereas there could transpire monopolisation and pricing transfers, that will cause under-utilisation of labor, that will cause a lag in the level of internal consumption demand and in the end will lead development to stagnate. Barrell and Pain (1999) discovered the benefits of FDI by U.S. multinationals in four European Coalition states and discovered that FDI could alter the host country’s presentation affirmatively in cases whereas there are transfers of knowledge and vision nevertheless the FDI to the host economy. Carkovic and Levine (2002) endeavored to reassess the connection amid FDI and commercial development for 72 states above the era 1960-1995. Their aftermath indicated that for both industrialized and growing economies FDI inflows did not exert an autonomous impact on commercial growth. Specifically the exogenous constituent of FDI did not exert a reliable affirmative encounter on commercial development, even permitting for the level of education, the level of commercial progress, the level of commercial progress and transactions openness of the recipient country. Brada,
This exhibit illustrates the dramatic growth of FDI into various world regions since the 1980s. The exhibit reveals that the dollar volume of FDI has grown immensely since the
Dunning (2008) put theoretical framework for, FDI determinants. the framework posits that firms invest abroad to look for three types of advantages: Ownership (O - The ownership-specific advantages “of property
According to Kolodkin(2013), the FDI is major source which helps the countries which have limited of capital or funds for the government expense and receive finance aid from wealthier countries investor. For example, the united state is the world’s largest economy which are consist a lot of investors which have surplus fund to invest in companies and the project internationally. FDI is determined by the investor to invest into the countries based on the country situation and environment. For example, the government of Malaysia wants to attract the investor around the world to invest in Malaysia by giving a benefit such as tax reduced, percentage of share that they can buy.
Foreign direct investment was neglected in the developmental process of Indian economy before 1991.the 1991 industrial policy has paved out a way for the foreign player, India is a democratic polity and is a country with the political stability and a growing pool of consumers and educated manpower which is a favorable aspect for FDI in India.