Hello Professor Walls, While nothing is perfect, I think regulatory agencies are both necessary and good in creating balance in a growing and changing society. For the most part, regulatory agencies are good because they protect the public from unfair business practices, discrimination, and to ensure safety practices amount many other things. For example, the U.S Equal Opportunity Commission regulates and ensures businesses comply with federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate. You ask if I think they are fair; although, this is not something I cannot say as an absolute. Fair can mean different things to different people. I might think something is fair while others may perceive it very differently. Also, I think what is fair includes whether there are good or bad motivations behind the act. I say this because there are very good people trying to do the best they can in the best interest of the public while …show more content…
Maybe this does not concern some people, but it does concern me. While this is controversial, I think the experts should have more weight in determining the safety of GM foods than the political process. But that is my opinion. In reading several articles, discretion on the part of the agencies seems to be controversial. Nevertheless, there is checks and balance in place on regulatory agencies. According to Ushistory.org (2015), the president appoints positions in these agencies, but the president does not directly control most of them. However, Congress has the power to create, alter, and reorganize agencies (Ushistory.org, 2015). Congress is responsible for providing funding and oversight, in which regulatory agencies are open to investigation and legal review by the
Although GMO can be helpful, it also can be reportedly damaging in relation with health. In 1999, a scientist conducted an experiment; feeding some mice GMO foods, and some other mice non-GMO foods. The mice that were fed GMO products showed signs of precancerous cells while the other mice were completely healthy. (Science in the News). After the information was given to the public, the researcher was fired. The public went into a mass of chaos. People stretched the story, others changed it, but nonetheless GMOs had been
GM foods are in the middle of many controversial issues; primarily these are addressed by conflicts over the relative pros and cons of GM foods. Major biotech companies like ‘Monsanto ' and ‘Cargill ' are promoting GM foods by focusing only on their beneficial aspects, giving least importance to their negative effects on safety, environment and biodiversity. On the other hand, governmental regulators and nongovernmental organizations, along with some scientists, are strictly opposing this type of blind promotion of GM food by enlightening the people on their negative effects The controversies associated with GM foods include issues such as safety, environmental benefits and risks, biodiversity, and ethical and social considerations.GM foods are implicated for adverse human health risks like people being allergic to it, environmental hazards such as development of super weeds, and pesticide and antibiotic resistance in disease causing organisms. On the other
To sum things up – when it comes to the bureaucracy, some of the controls that the president has the authority to use are: appoint and remove agency heads, reorganize the bureaucracy, make changes in budget proposals, reduce an agency's budget, ignore initiatives from the bureaucracy, and issue executive orders. Nonetheless, even with all of the powers and controls that the president possesses, taking into account the sheer magnitude and breadth of the bureaucracy, having complete control over it is not even feasible. In addition, even though the president is delegated the responsibility of managing the bureaucracy, when throwing the influences of Congress,
Professor Richard Lewotin said “An ecosystem, you can always intervene and change something in it, but there is no way of knowing what all the downstream effects will be or how it will affect the environment.” Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are not healthy and they shouldn’t be put in our food. Our nation does not know the full extent of GMOs. GMOs are used in almost all of our food, and for the most part there are no regulations for these GMOs that food companies are using now a days. They have been used for years without telling us the full background and side effects they could have. As a nation we need to take the right step in learning the facts about them and making our food truly healthy. GMOs should be made illegal due to the fact that studies have shown them to be unsafe and harmful to consume.
In general, a regulation is a rule employed in controlling, directing, or managing an activity, organization, and/or system. However, in relating to law, a regulation is a specific rule that is enforced by a regulatory agency. This is also known as administrative regulations. These regulations are created and passed to enforce statutory laws and policies. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is an agency that administers federal health and welfare programs and activities. This agency created and enforces specific regulations for the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Although, there are many other policy issues and topics that this agency has established regulations
Objective of this paper is to discuss where the following agencies lie in the administrative structure of the federal government:
Regulatory agencies are government related agencies that are responsible for exercising authority in a supervisory capacity. One example of a regulatory agency is the State Board of Nursing, which is a government regulated agency. The State Board is responsible for the public health and welfare, by assuring that licensed nurses provide safe and competent care. Regulatory agencies, such as the Board of Nursing, regulate my practice by enforcing that Nurse Practice Acts are followed and they also outline standards for safe nursing practice. Another way the Board of Nursing helps regulate my practice is by enforcing continuation of education every year. (Regulatory Agency, 2015)
department has a Deputy Commissioner who has to report to the Commissioner of the FDA.
The health concerns seem to be what garner the most disapproval of GM foods. In “A Lonely Quest for Facts on Genetically Modified Crops,” Amy Harmon, quotes an anti GM activist, Ms. Willie, who says that “these fruits and vegetables are not natural.” Consumers argue that they don’t know what is going into these foods chemically, and the health risks over time are unknown. In “The Threats from Genetically Modified Foods,” Robin Mather cites the findings of Professor Cummins of the University of Western Ontario, Cummings announced to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that "there is evidence that [biotechnology] will impact directly on human health through damage to the ileum… [which] can produce chronic illnesses such as fecal incontinence and/ or flu-like upsets of the digestive system" (43). GM foods have been placed unlabeled in grocery stores for years. If one chooses to purchase the goods, one should
Federal agencies were each created to oversee a specific area or aspect of the governments responsibility to its citizens; therefore, each agency had a different job and goal that they must aspire to reach for the sake of the United Sates government and its people. The Environmental Protection Agency was put in place due to the peoples needs to have a safe and healthy environment to live in for this generation and future generations. The jobs of the EPA are essential to everyday life and the future of the United States.
Lying in the middle of this conflict are perhaps the most essential parties, the U.S. Government and the American public. The government has not truly taken a stand on either side of this conflict as of yet. Their position can best be classified as optimistic supporters. Seeing as GM foods have not as of yet been subject to heavy administrational burdens, research and testing by several different agencies continues today. The lead agency in biotechnology testing is the Animal and Plant Health
Making them safe to eat and no studies were required to test the safety of these GM foods. The reason for this, the FDA official in charge of promoting GMOs was the former attorney for Monsanto, one of the biggest biotech companies that made huge profits. After the official was removed from his position in the FDA, it was found that the FDA scientist had actually warned against the use of GM foods because of their ability to create hard to predict side effects such as new diseases, nutritional problems, and allergies. These scientist pushed for long-term safety studies but were rejected. Many of biotech companies that have been found to hide the effects of their toxins, are in charge of deciding whether foods are GM
Congress has delegated a significant amount of authority to the federal bureaucracy by granting the agencies the power to draft federal regulations (rule making) and to adjudicate conflicts over these regulations.
Presidents, in my opinion, do not have the explicit authority to control administrative agencies and their ability to promulgate law however; I do believe they do have the ability to pressure these agencies to some extent in a favorable direction. The President’s power, for lack of a better term, is granted by the constitution, authority delegated by the Congress or expressly provided by statute. The president does have authority to appoint specific agency heads. Article II, Section 2 also provides the President with authority to appoint officers of the U.S. “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.” This language demonstrates the drafter’s specific intent to place checks and balances on presidential power that is consistent with the
There are various government structures in organizations although they are different from one branch of the government to the other. The structures help the government manage its economy efficiently. In the economy a too big to fail firm (TBTF) exists and it is defined as one that its complexity, size, critical functions, and interconnections are in the sense that in case the firm goes into liquidation unexpectedly, the rest of the economy and financial system will face severe consequences. The government provides support to TBTF companies not because they favor them but because they recognize implications for an advanced economy of allowing a disorderly failure outweighs the cost of avoiding the failure. Helping the TBTF firms enable the economy to realize high revenue. Various activities are to prevent their failure. They include providing credit, facilitating a merger, or injecting the capital of the government. The paper addresses the structures of the administration and the concept of too big to fail in financial and non-financial institutions plus the ethics involved with the theory.