What does proctoring mean to me and how important is it to my education? What are my responsibilities to ensure the integrity of the exam and the proctor monitoring it?
Colleges and universities that offer remote education usually require their students, especially degree seekers, to take proctored exams, tests administered and supervised for the entire duration. Proctors, most often authoritative figures such as elected officials, teachers, high school principles, guidance councilors, librarians, or even religious figures, oversee that academic integrity is being practiced while taken. Here, at UoPeople, proctored exams are absolutely necessary to prevent course failure, resulting in the inability to graduate.
Proctoring means to monitor a student while giving exams by a responsible individual. “Proctoring is an impartial monitoring or supervision of a student during their examination by a responsible and impartial individual appointed for the same.” (University of the People, personal communication, June, 30 2016)
Proctoring is the act of supervising or monitoring a student during his or her examination
Students dread the time of the year when they stop with their course material and begin to prepare for test. Everyone is in agreement that some type of revolution is needed when it comes to education; eliminating standardized test will aid the reform. The need for standardized testing has proven to be ineffective and outdated; some leading educationalist also believe this because the tests do not measure a student’s true potential. This will save money, stop labeling, and alleviate stress in students and teachers.
Proctoring is the use of someone to oversee your exam taking. UoPeople requires proctored exams in order to maintain high standards in their educational pursuits. They also have an interest in being accredited and therefore probably have a stipulation to have proctored exams. There are probably other reasons for proctored exams, such as to have integrity in the exam system. The reason only certain courses are proctored as they are deemed to be necessary knowledge when one says that they have a Bachelor in that area.
* Be familiar with and guided by all relevant standards which further define how legislation is applied.
When a teacher is presented with this conflict, going against standard regulations may be tempting. To regulate this, many states have placed strict guidelines where the students’ teacher is not the individual proctoring the test. However, there are still several states that have the teacher administer test to his or her own students, often times without another proctor in the room. This inconsistency between state regulations also proves the biased separation between how students are tested from state to state, causing certain students more opportunities for assistance than others. With this lack of security, it becomes incredibly easy for teachers to go against common regulations, such as allowing more time on sections, allowing students to go back and work on previous sections, or answering any municipal questions the children may ask, or major, such as changing a student’s attempted answer to correct, or opening a test before the test date and teaching the students the exact test questions. These frightening test practices send a message that “examiners should take into consideration the appropriate changes to be done, keeping in mind the professional and standardization of the test” (Farah). Although these test tampering methods can be seen as the teachers way of assisting students with academic disabilities that do not receive the help they need, the
Complying with these standards helps to maintain user confidence in providing quality training and delivery of the various qualifications.
Testing has felt tremendous influence from the emphasis on efficiency. University examinations have moved from individual testing by professors to nowadays where most exams are machine graded, text-book given multiple choice tests. Thus, with the infiltration of McDonaldization into the educational system, test taking has become extremely efficient for the professor.
of drug use. Also, all students must submit to the test, making it 1) suspicionless, and 2)
As defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary, a proctor is “one appointed to supervise students at an examination” (Merriam-Webster.org, n.d). In the academic community, proctored exams are considered the optimum solution. Once a student takes an examination under the supervision of a proctor, the expertise has several advantages. Proctored exams validate the integrity of a student’s entire transcript. once a final examination is run by an objective proctor, it lends significant credibility to a student’s incontestable mastery and ability of the topic. When a student takes proctored exams, the expertise demonstrates that the scholar will perform during this setting equally similarly as their traditionally-schooled peers. Hence, The UoPeople regulated the procedures of taking proctored exams and applied a set of rules concerning the choice and the criteria of registering the proctor.
Furthermore, an appropriate adult must be 18 years and above. An appropriate adult ought to be
* Be open and honest, act with integrity and uphold the reputation of their profession
The instructor also hints the questions that would be asked in the exam during the class so as to enable them take notes of the same. Trainees who are not able to answer despite all these relaxations are helped by the invigilators during the exam, hence enabling them clear the training process. The examination is treated more as a legal procedure than as an evaluation criterion. The procedure was not changed even after the World Trade Centre attacks and the London bombings.