What Is The Bystander Effect?

This essay will ‘compare and contrast’ two approaches made in investigating the ‘bystander effect’. It will discuss in some depth as to what exactly is meant by the bystander effect, illustrating when this concept was first shown and why. An outline will be made of the different methods used, those being experiments and discourse analysis, explaining each one in turn, within the framework of two cases. The first being the murder of ‘Catherine Genovese,’ 1964.and the second ‘James Bulger’ 1993. The essay will then show examples of the differences and similarities between each method. Concluding with a summary of findings into the two approaches to investigating the Bystander Effect.

different times) act as if they were is a lot of pain or a drunk. The test was to see how long it took

On March 13, 1964, a woman by the name of Kitty Genovese was walking towards her apartment-complex in New York City, when suddenly she was fatally stabbed on different occasions by a man named Winston Moseley. As she screamed and begged for people to help, her neighbors just stood and idly watched the incident. The neighbors were well aware of her situation due to her screams and some even watched the incident happen. There were 38 witnesses to the event, and no phone calls were made, until after her death. Why do you think no one helped? Why did her neighbors watch? What could have changed the outcome?

The Bystander effect is a controversial theory given to social phenomenon where the more potential helpers there are, the less likely any individual is to help. A traditional explanation for this Bystander Effect is that responsibility diffuses across the multiple bystanders, diluting the responsibility of each. (Kyle et al.) The Bystander effect, also known as the Genovese Syndrome, was created after the infamous murder of “Kitty” Catherine Genovese in 1964, on the streets of New York in front of thirty-seven witnesses. After studying the Genovese syndrome and doing research on how this phenomenon occurs today, it is clear The Bystander effect is not theory, but actually fact.

Whether the passengers were traveling alone or with others, almost every person rated themselves at around a 4, a much different result from what the experiment shows (Grzyb 3). This study proves, yet again, that the bystander effect holds up, but also that people think of themselves as helpful, they want to help others, but other factors influence them while in the moment. Darley and Latane’s work laid the ground work for a lot of studies and has been proven time and time again to be true. In many different types of social situations and varying degrees of danger, the bystander effect seems to hold

People act differently when they are alone versus when they are in a group. Of course, it would seem logical that when a person is in a group they would act better because people are around, probably some of whom they know, to judge actions. This may be the case for most actions, but a curious psychological response, called the "bystander effect", has been observed which shows a troubling aspect of group behavior. This essay will look at a particular case that started the research into this phenomena, why it happens, and how it is effected by other variables.

Imagine you get attacked while in your car, in the middle of heavy traffic, on your way to work. The attacker had a knife and baseball bat. They break open your window with the baseball bat, drop it, and start to stab at you. You get cut, and start to scream for help. But none of the hundreds of others come to you aid. They quickly disperse, causing an accident, and leave you on your own to die. You get cut at the heart, and thrown out of the car, left to die. “Why didn’t they help him?” many other people would think. The answer to that is something called the bystander effect. The Bystander Effect is when someone who is capable of helping another person in danger, does nothing but idly stand by, watching the event happen.

The bystander effect is both a social and psychological phenomenon in which an individual’s inclination towards showing helping behaviours are minimised by the influence of other people. Research has found that the more people acting as bystanders in a situation, the less likely it is that helping behaviours will be demonstrated. However in the correct conditions, where conditioned cues increase self-awareness, it is possible to reverse the bystander effect phenomenon. The bystander effect is prevalent in everyday life, and often decorates the news, shocking the world, especially when authority figures such as police men and women succumb to the effect. Diffusion of responsibility, ignorance of others interpretation of an event and self-consciousness are all social processes which appear to lead to social inhibition of helping behaviours and one of the main theories of the bystander effect is provided Latané and Darley (1970) whose cognitive model provides a series of decisions that can lead to social inhibition. The bystander effect is influenced by the conditions an individual is in when an event occurs, for example the bystander effect appears to be most dominant when an individual is in a group of strangers with low group cohesiveness. FINISH

The bystander effect is the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in an emergency situation (Bystander Effect, n.d.). For example, a person had witnessed a car incident happened and the victims were seeking for help. If the person was the only one who were encountered in the situation, he would react fast and give help to the victim. Furthermore, the numbers of the bystander will affect a person if they wanted to involve in an emergency situation. For instance, if 2 or more people had witnessed the same car incident as mentioned before, they were slower and less likely to give help to the victim.

Introduction: The bystander effect is a normal occurrence that happens when the presence of others decreases an individual’s probability to intervene in an emergency situation. There are many reasons to why the bystander effect occurs, the main reason being the fact that the individual’s sense of responsibility is reduced when there are other people witnessing the situation. Culture plays a significant role in determining if a bystander will or will not aid during certain situations. Western countries such as Australia, United States, Germany and Ireland are all known to have an individualist culture, where people are seen as

As previously described, gap junction channels allow the delivery of signals from one cell to another. These cell signals can be for cell survival or cell death. The effect where neighboring cells are affected through the spread of GJP is known as the bystander effect.

I think the word bystander effect means when individuals do not offer help in an emergency situation.the studies show the majority of students are likely to be a bystander when it is related to sexual assault because they might see it as being acceptable or they’re too scared to help or don't want to involve themselves in the situation. Reasons because they don't want to talk to the police or have to have a witness. People film rape and put it in social media because they want everybody to know what's going. Some People would film it because they have phones or they would do it for views.

Recently, a young student from DePaul University in Chicago was attacked on a train. Jessica Hughes was on the Blue Line, also known as the “L”, when two men attacked her during the day (Holmes). Hughes was not the only passenger on the train, and was screaming for help, so why didn’t anybody step up to help her? After a lengthy discussion with my mom about this topic and after hearing her scoff and claim that she would have helped, I told her about the clear, silent culprit - the bystander effect. According to Psychology Today, “The bystander effect occurs when the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in an emergency situation.” The problem

In our lives we have a choice. We can choose to rise above social norms and be a leader, or we can choose to blend in with the crowd and be a follower. Similarly, we can choose to be a bystander, or we can choose to take action and possibly make a difference in the world that we live in. It can be morally conflicting to choose whether to take action when something is wrong. The dilemma stems from the unknown outcome, which could result in positive or negative results. In an article published by The Seattle Times this past July, this conflict in human beings is exemplified. The article discusses a particularly disturbing attack on a train passenger, ending in his death. The man was stabbed 20 times by an 18-year-old boy, with a “slight” frame,

The bystander effect is a social psychological scenario where a person who is in an urgent situation is not given any help by the people around due to the discourage from the presence of others (whatispsychology.biz, 2017). Social psychologists, John Darley and Bibb Latane, introduced the bystander effect in the 1960s after the murder of Kitty Genovese, a young woman who was stabbed to death outside her home in New York City. It took her attacker more than half an hour to kill her, and during that time, thirty-eight people saw her being murdered, and they did nothing to help her. “The responsibility for helping was diffused among the observers” (Darley & Latane, 1968).