What Is The Importance Of Peer Review Wikipedia

Why it is important: According to American Nurse Association, “Peer review in nursing is the process by which practicing registered nurses systematically access, monitor, and make judgments about the quality of nursing care provided by peers as measured against professional standards of practice….Peer review implies that the nursing care delivered by a group of nurses or an individual nurse is evaluated by individuals of the same rank or standing according to established standards of practice” (ANA, 1988). Peer review is about nurses taking responsibility for their practice and about nurses evaluating nurses. It is about raising the standards of practice for all, and ultimately about providing the best care we can give for our patients. According

A review of the proposed participants of the study will ensure high-risk groups (if any) will be considered as per the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (‘National Statement’; NHMRC, 2007). While some of these high-risk

Is Wikipedia credible or not credible? Wikipedia is commonly known for anyone to publish their own opinions and it may not be very reliable. However, Wikipedia can seem useful but with the info not being credible can mess up the students research if they only use Wikipedia. Casper Grathwohl thinks the opposite though based on his article “Wikipedia Comes of Age” a chronicle of the higher education. He states that students are using it as a pre information guide before they do further research. Students should use it as a personal information guide. This article makes some good points in mentioning such as research studies, and how Wikipedia should be used as a formal research tool. This type of argument is determined as a classical argument. This would be very helpful in books explaining why Wikipedia should be a formal research tool for students. This explains that anyone can use it to get brief knowledge but should rely on other and more reliable sources. The article “Wikipedia Comes of age” by Casper Grathwohl should be in a textbook because, he states how it can help with information on the topic you are researching but not to use it as a reliable one and only source.

A number of key terms describe the system of ethical considerations that the modern research establishments have set up to protect the rights of research subjects. Voluntary participation and confidentiality are principles that demands that the respondents to be free from coercion in any way when participating in the research, protected in the raw data, and published

Informed consent gives the participant the choice of agreeing to part-take in the research whilst simultaneously encompasses the responsibility of the researcher to deliver all the information about the study, its purpose, results, harm, sponsors and the identity of the researchers to the potential participants (McLaughlin 2006, 64). However, several populations, such as children, person with intellectual or mental disabilities will face barriers in comprehending the given information (Wiles, Health, Crow & Charles, 2005; Campbell 1997, p.32). As NCRM manifested, from the field of psychology it has been demonstrated that different methods of information provision impacts the individuals understanding of the research (Wiles, Health, Crow & Charles, 2005). This is particularly a fundamental challenge with groups such as refugees as researchers need to be extra cautious when providing information so the implication of the research is understood. For example, in many instances refugees are shocked to find their stories in public domains through DVDs and magazine, displaying they were unable to understand the repercussions of a released DVD or media article despite giving informed consent (Pittaway, Bartolomei & Hugman 2010, p.233). Furthermore, researchers negotiate access to participants through a range of gatekeepers such as school, organisations and care settings who have no legal rights in the

Almost anyone who is old enough to navigate a computer and have a sense of curiosity knows what Wikipedia is – a free, online encyclopedia with hundreds of thousands of articles which anyone can edit freely. Because this site allows almost anyone to edit almost any page, however, there is a debate surrounding it on the topic of reliability. Should Wikipedia count as a credible source, or should it be considered unreliable?

On the other hand, the current study does not specify if the consent of the participants was obtained. According to the British Sociological Association’s Statement of Ethical Practice (2004) consent of participants should not be asked just once but every time the data is used in other studies. However, the ethic code maybe is not broke if it is alleged that information provided maintains the anonymity of participants. Therefore, it cannot be said that the research failed the ethic code of research due to the lack of guide lines that regulate the use of past data in recent

The Belmont Report establishes ethical standards for researchers seeking to involve human subjects (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1979). Among these standards is respect for persons- the right of people to be treated as autonomous agents (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1979). Privacy, anonymity, and confidentiality (PAC) fall under this standard (Farrimond, 2013). In research studies, privacy refers to an expectation that access to participants ' information will be limited to those that have a legitimate right to it (Farrimond, 2013). It is also expected that reasonable steps will be taken to prevent unauthorized access to the information. To expand on privacy, most studies allow anonymity- the removal of names and other identifying information (addresses, job titles, age) to protect the identities of participants (Farrimond, 2013). Anonymity increases the likelihood that potential subjects will agree to participate in a study, as they feel more comfortable disclosing information that may otherwise result in negative consequences (Farrimond, 2013). Confidentiality ensures study participants that their information will not be shared beyond the scope of the study (Farrimond, 2013).

Wikipedia the site where users are able to change the work made by authors is not a credible source.Wikipedia does not have a way to make sure the information users seek is fact or fiction due to the fact that it does not have any security measures to prevent users from making unauthorized changes to information, which makes it unreliable for research.Wikipedia should not belong in the college classroom for doing research and should be banned from the classroom for having false information.The site wikipedia is not an adequate source for students due to the liability of misleading information.

1. Wikipedia helps people find other, more credible sources to cite. They lead people to different and more credible cites and more vast information (Davidson 167). It is also pretty accurate a good amount of the time as well; if does not have many errors and they can and are fixed as soon as they are discovered (Davidson 167).

In high school, when my teacher told me to research a topic and write an essay on it, I would go to Google and type in the topic. Once Google provided me with millions of hits, I usually chose the first one and used it. Also, I would use Wikipedia. Wikipedia contains information about topics, but people can edit those pages and put false information. At the beginning of my second semester, I started to learn about scholarly sources. Scholarly sources usually come from an expert or doctor. These experts and doctors take the time to research the topic and provide it to the public. Using scholarly sources helps improve your argument or viewpoint. Sources such as CNN, CBS, and NBC are popular sources and do not

When it comes to the topic of Wikipedia, most of us will readily agree that you can get some valuable information from the website. Where this agreement usually end, however, is on the question of credibility. Whereas some are convinced that the website is a waste of time, other maintains that it can serve some purpose. Wikipedia has certain guidelines that must be met before a person can submit an article; it must have been covered in an academic journal or in the mainstream media. This is a way to ensure that the information is accurate. There is also a person who monitors the website to check information that is submitted. So before a person goes and dismisses the thought of using Wikipedia they should at least take a chance and see what

There are several ethical issues that can arise when conducting research. A few of these are field of study dilemmas, the researchers’ integrity, social and economic issues, physical and psychological issues. Field of study refers to areas of research that are controversial in nature. Ethical dilemmas that can arise under fields of study are contentious topics such as embryo research and fetal tissue research (National Institute of Health, 2008). Studies such as this could be deemed not ethically acceptable research. Researchers’ integrity can pose problems when researchers behave in ways that are not appropriate for the sake of research. Social and economic issues in research include problems such as stigma, embarrassment within social groups and financial burdens. If research data is disclosed to outside sources it could damage a participant’s reputation, they can become

Ethics comes into play when data is collected. Specifics pertain to all individuals included when data is being collected. Studies should not be conducted for a self-serving reason; they should be conducted in a way that keeps individual or group information confidential and the individual who is conducting the research should remain open minded and accept the results whatever they are. Also, subjects should not be forced to participate. All these things must be taken into account for

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. It contains millions of articles and depends mainly on volunteers and contributors to ensure that information are up to date. This is an open source that anyone can add and edit articles; so information may not always be accurate. It is the quickest and easier way to gain general knowledge on a specific topic. An encyclopedia is generally not a good source of reference in a paper; rather it can be a starting point in research the topic. The issue of reliability and credibility arises because of lack of credentials of editors, including biased view in content, articles are not peer-reviewed before publishing, source cited may be invalid,