preview

What Is The Irony In The Necklace

Decent Essays

Another similarity between the stories is that each protagonist gets unforeseen occasions to actualize their dreams. Mathilde and Pahom get opportunities to accomplish what they had long desired. Although Mathilde’s story was short lived, the only time she was shown to be happy was when she was given a chance to witness a first-hand experience among the elite class of society. With her brand new dress and borrowed jewelry, fully at comfort with the rich around, she believed that she belonged to the wealthy – had it not been destiny’s mistake. She momentarily forgoes her old life (with her husband dozing off in an empty room) and plunges on to the illusion of the new, unrealistic one. Little does she realize that her fleeting moment of happiness is only meant to end in a disaster. Similarly, on Pahom’s last trip to acquire land, he …show more content…

The Necklace” and “How Much Land Does a Man Need” end in a catastrophe. In “The Necklace”, The Loisels spent ten years paying off for a substitute only to realize the actual worthlessness of the necklace. Another irony that has been portrayed is that Mathilde’s beauty, which was her only valuable asset, also deteriorated and disappeared during the labor years for the necklace. The strenuous life that Mathilde must assume makes her low, resentful old life – seem luxurious. She borrowed a necklace from Madam Forestier in order to portray having more money than she actually does only to lose what she already does have. She pays in double measure – money and her looks for something that was meritless from the very beginning. Similar irony has been exhibited in “How Much Land Does a Man Need.” As the avarice starts kicking in, Pahom tries to gain as much land as he can. In this journey, he hits his head at the starting point and dies out of fatigue. After being buried, by the end, he only required a piece of land - eight feet long and three feet wide. Greed got Pahom to his

Get Access