preview

What Is The Pruitt-Igoe Complex?

Decent Essays

Upon the passing of redevelopment and urban renewal laws, Mayor Darst razed the Chestnut Valley area (University of Missouri St. Louis). This idea continued with Mayor Tucker as he razed Mill Creek Valley (University of Missouri St. Louis). Issues arose in the Mill Creek Valley area as it was predominantly African-American and had businesses ranging from schools to hardware stores (University of Missouri St. Louis). Consequently, the Mill Creek Valley area was known for its lack of cleanliness, and in fact, “many of these residences and institutions were considered unsanitary and in need of repair” (University of Missouri St. Louis). While the 1940s did not bring a large amount of slum clearance to the city of St. Louis, it paved the way …show more content…

Louis because of its unlikely stature. However, Pruitt-Igoe was destroyed by vandalism and crime (Hoffmann). After the failed attempts of housing redevelopment, St. Louis became subject of the Berlin Wall effect (Gordon 2009, 12). Nevertheless, the city planners and Harland Bartholomew refused to stop looking for a solution. Public housing was a vicious cycle, however the housing authority believed they could solve the city’s problems (Bartholomew 1937, 117). The housing authority wanted to “clear the slums, and house the poor” (Bartholomew 1937, 117); consequently Pruitt-Igoe’s failure along with a failed public policy showed …show more content…

Louis also struggled because of the power of federalism. The Federal Housing Act of 1949 defined a blighted area as one that was predominantly residential (Gordon 2009, 203). The definition “did not require cities or developers to erect affordable housing in redeveloped districts” (Gordon 2009, 203). The federal government’s definition of blight meant the city could raze blighted areas, but they did not have to provide or construct housing for the people who were displaced, thus putting pressure on the city. Some critics may argue that the 1947 St. Louis city plan had more negative effects on the city than positive because of the stress and toll it placed on the citizens. However, the positives outweigh the negatives because Bartholomew’s ultimate vision was for his plans to lead the way for decades to follow (Wittstruck 2015). Bartholomew’s plans and ideas constructed a new vision for a lackluster city, thus his plans while had negative aspects was far more positive. Overall, the 1947 St. Louis city plan changed the city in positive ways because it spurred renewal, began the process of urbanization throughout the city, and it allowed the city to rebound from its housing failures. Harland Bartholomew and the city planners of St. Louis created a vision that was once not foreseeable in St. Louis by finding the issues, locating the sources, and looking for solutions. St. Louis would not be the city it is today without Harland Bartholomew and the 1947

Get Access