What Purpose And Composition Of An Ideal State Should Be And The Consequences Of The Individual
1894 Words8 Pages
Among the more controversial intellectual ventures of continental philosophers is answering the question of what the purpose and composition of an ideal state should be and the consequences of that state on its citizens. Philosophers Hegel and Rousseau found common ground in the need for a form of authority separate from the collective people, but they prescribed different types of government based on their conflicting views on a state’s exact role in relation to the citizens.
At the heart of both Rousseau and Hegel’s political theories is their anxiety about the alienation of the individual. In The Social Contract, Rousseau asserts that an individual is alienated from in nature because he is trapped in systems of envy and desire, shaped…show more content… Despite this qualification, an elected aristocracy based in popular sovereignty is Rousseau’s ideal form of government. In an elected aristocracy the wisest govern the many which is ideal so long as they govern for the profit of the state and not for their own selfish goals. Assemblies are more easily held and issues are better discussed, both ingredients for a strong state ruled by the people. A government composed of popularly elected magistrates and a legislator are the key features of Rousseau’s state. Rousseau said “He who has command over men ought not to have command over laws, or else his laws would be the ministers of his passions and would serve to perpetuate injustices.” The legislator is necessary because although citizens want what is best for the collective, they do not usually think about what specifically would be best.
Ideally, the legislative body would be a disinterested but all-knowing power objectively establishing rules. The social compact of the people breathes life into the body politic, and legislator gives it movement and will. When citizens vote they vote in favor of their own self-interests, but all citizens have common needs and desires so the majority of rational voters will reflect these collective agreements. The collective desires of the majority will
contingency theory is deeply rooted in the postmodern discourse and without understanding the ideals that underlines postmodernism one cannot understand contingency
PRODUCTION CONSUMPTION AND THE CITY
Castells’s earlier writings were much focused towards the urban studies and his writings addressed many challenges, issues and the problems in the urban studies. His writings challenged the present existing orthodoxies in the society by developing many arguments and intense interest. And later on many emerging European theorists started to propound their own agendas for studying the urban.
“In The Urban Question” castell’s approach was:-
(i) Ahistorical
(ii) Ethnocentric
In general, as human beings we go through transformation beyond recognition this may be because of the frequent encounters with ethical dilemmas. “Ethical dilemmas are problems without a satisfactory resolution”. What makes ethical dilemmas particularly difficult is that they often involve conflicts between two or more deeply held beliefs. These dilemmas can transpire within family, work and relationships. While some dilemmas can be answered by reference to religious beliefs, other dilemmas require
conflict based on the writings of philosopher John Stuart Mill, titled On Liberty and Utilitarianism. We will discuss how his philosophical views on equality as fundamental to what it means to be human. We will interpret John Stuart Mill’s theorist view on equality as fundamental to the good or bad functioning of the state? The question and debate we would also raise will be, is equality be integral the arrangements of power? Lastly, we would argue the theorist’s approach to liberty fundamentally
the sexuality and gender identities of LGBTQIA+ youths, causing them emotional distress.
As humans, we feel more comfortable putting ourselves into categories. We find comfort in belonging to the same category, therefore emphasizing that everyone should fall into neat little boxes. One such box is being heterosexual and cisgendered, as opposed to being homosexual or bisexual, and transgendered or non-gender conforming. In Kate Henley Averett’s journal article on LGBTQ parenting, The Gender Buffet
An impressive push to extend intellectual property by the entertainment industry may result in the development of new technologies and revolution in the way people watch TV, access information at home, experience interactive TV. But at what cost?
There must be a balance between the developer of the intellectual property and the interest of the public. Intellectual property is already a big business among companies. Expanding the monopolies has the effect of allowing companies to negotiate
alone makes it possible for actions to be declared moral based upon their consequences without taking motives into question.
The best way to illustrate this key difference between deontological and teleological theories is by examining Philippa Foot’s trolley problem. Overall, this illustration attempts to clarify under what circumstances it would be morally just for one person to violate the rights of another for the purpose of benefiting the group. In doing so it helps one essentially justify harming
their low esteem within the culture, their hypocrisy, their lack of credibility and the blatant rejection by society’s new post-modern view. Bickel and Jantz begin with a discussion on society’s view of Christians, none of which are positive. They state that this is a known fact that even Christians agree with. They then begin to compare the Christians with legalistic Pharisees. In other words, just as Pharisees failed God’s commands so have
half on campus which can hurt by having food or not having food to eat healthy enough.
The benefit of adequate nutrition contributing to successful athletic performance is well known, but not completely understood and applied among athletes. The purpose of this study was to assess nutrient intakes, and dietary habits
Concerns about the compensation of executive officers and other top executives of American public companies have reached fever pitch since the financial crisis and economic meltdown recently. Some observers blame the recent recession in part on the unsound compensation arrangements for the top management of major financial institutions. For almost 20 years, a growing reprise of voices—including some shareholders, the business media, policymakers, and academics—have been criticizing the way top managers